In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, October 1, 2010

645 - UID programme will take a few years to show greater impact - Live Mint

Posted: Fri, Oct 1 2010. 1:00 AM IST

Key means of financial inclusion need to be put in place before the benefits of the scheme become evident
 
Sanjiv Shankaran, sanjiv.s@livemint.com
New Delhi

The unique identification (UID) programme is likely to underpin the government’s efforts to bring the bulk of India’s population into the organized sector, but its impact will take a few years to show as other important means of financial inclusion need to be put in place, experts said.

The UID programme aims to provide every Indian resident with a 12-digit identification number based on their biometric data. The first UID was issued in Maharashtra on Wednesday; the government intends to issue UID numbers to 600 million people by 2014.

“If enthusiasm (for the programme) remains at the current levels, it will take three years to get 90% of coverage level and other things will trail by two more years,” said Vijay Mahajan, founder-chairman of Basix Group, which provides microfinance.

Poor people in both rural and urban India are often unable to open bank accounts as they have no identification. This excludes them from the benefits of financial services such as microfinance.

Mahajan, who was on a government panel that submitted a report on financial inclusion in 2008, said there are three key requirements to bring more people under the banking net.

“UID is the first step. It needs to be backed by banks opening accounts for people with UIDs. Finally, there have to be a large number of banking outlets to facilitate transactions,” he said.

Nandan Nilekani, chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), is scheduled to meet Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials on Friday to explore ways in which banks can link with the project, said a UID official who did not want to be named.

RBI is upbeat about UID’s potential to dovetail into its efforts to nudge banks toward spreading their coverage.

“The UID will be a powerful instrumentality for helping poor people establish their identity to meet the banks’ KYC (know your customer) norms,” RBI governor D. Subbarao said in December during a speech on financial inclusion.

“I believe, this (UID) is going to reduce cash and non-cash transaction costs—both to the banks and to the potential customers,” Subbarao said.

Over the past five years, banks have been reaching out to poor people through so-called “no frills” accounts, designed to meet basic banking needs at low or zero cost.

RBI’s latest annual report said 50.6 million “no frills” accounts were opened between November 2005, when they were launched, and March 2010—with an outstanding balance of Rs.5,386 crore.

Mahajan said Indian banks need to open about 500 million accounts, a fivefold increase from the current level. UID can be critical as it “will potentially make all 500 million have access to authentication”, he said.

Currently, banks typically use business correspondents to provide last-mile connectivity with the unbanked. According to RBI, barely 5% of India’s habitations are covered by bank branches.

Anirban Roy, managing director of Seed Infrastructure and Solutions (P) Ltd, a business correspondent, said banks have already started designing the “no-frills” build-up to accommodate customers with UID numbers.

Seed has opened about 1.5 million accounts in 17 states. According to Roy, the “no-frills” customers roped in by Seed are given a biometric smart card.The smart cards come with different “pockets” to meet varying needs such as withdrawals and deposits. The cards distributed by Seed have an extra pocket to store a customer’s unique identity number whenever it is generated, Roy said.

“UID is giving a national identity,” Roy said. “It could be useful going forward.”