In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, June 10, 2012

2608 - Cabinet panel moves to defuse new UID-NPR row - Live Mint


Cabinet panel moves to defuse new UID-NPR row
Posted: Sat, Jun 9 2012. 1:00 AM IST

Surabhi Agarwal, surabhi.a@livemint.com

In a bid to defuse another simmering intra-government dispute, the cabinet committee on the unique identity (UID) project has agreed to tweak the process of data collection under the National Population Register (NPR).

In a meeting on Thursday, the cabinet had given the go-ahead to the home ministry to send biometric data of residents collected under NPR to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) for the Aadhaar number generation ahead of the so-called “social vetting” procedure or local register of usual residents (LRUR) publication stage.

In the LRUR process, data collected by the Registrar General of India is displayed at prominent places within localities inviting claims or objections from the public. Only after this is authenticated at multiple levels, is it processed further.
While the change in the NPR process was acceptable in principle to UIDAI, the latter was insisting on legalizing it. This led to Union home minister P. 

Chidambaram accusing UIDAI of not accepting NPR biometric data and also opposing some camps set up by NPR. According to the now-accepted procedure, the LRUR process will be conducted after the Aadhaar number is generated based on data given by NPR.

A senior official who is familiar with the discussions said that while the change in process was verbally stated during the cabinet meeting in January, where a compromise was reached between the two agencies on collection of biometrics, “there was no legal backing to it”.

He added that legalizing it was important as there were security concerns involved with generating UID numbers based on pre-LRUR data. “The matter is now settled as the committee feels that even the pre-LRUR data is acceptable for Aadhaar generation as it has been collected by government officials during the census and also digitized under scrutiny,” he said.

The reworking of the NPR data collection process will not only hasten the creation of its database, but it will also speed up Aadhaar generation.
However, it would also lead to some additional costs as there are chances of Aadhaar numbers being cancelled after they have been issued based on LRUR feedback. Since the data will now be sent before it is vetted by the public, there are chances of errors creeping in, which could lead to the rejection of NPR data by UIDAI before number generation. The official cited above, who did not want to be identified, said that “these conditions put up by UIDAI have been accepted by the cabinet committee”.

However, some experts have questioned the changes.

A Demographic Data Standards and Verification Procedure (DDSVP) Committee had suggested three ways of Aadhaar enrolment: one based on supporting documents, the second on the introducer system, and the third on the NPR process of public scrutiny.
“If the verification stage follows number generation, NPR will surely gain speed,” said N. Vittal, a former central vigilance commissioner of India. “However, by doing this, (the) home ministry is not walking their talk on the focus on security.”

Vittal, who also chaired the DDSVP Committee, said the home ministry had always been critical of UIDAI for being too liberal in its enrolment strategy. However, it was now sacrificing security for speed, he said.
A senior home ministry official denied this.

“There is no let-up on security issues and it is not compromised,” he said. “The LRUR will still be carried out. Had there been any security implication, the cabinet would not have cleared it in first place.” The official didn’t want to be named.

Late last year, Chidambaram wrote to Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, highlighting the possibility of fake profiles in the UID data. He said that while UIDAI enrolment was based on the production of documents or an introducer-based mechanism, biometric data in NPR is captured by enumerators and is also socially vetted by publication and being placed before local government bodies. Issues about an overlap between the two projects were subsequently highlighted.

Following the spat, the cabinet decided on a compromise between the two agencies. Both projects would continue simultaneously and each would use the biometric data collected by the other. While UIDAI’s mandate was increased to cover a population of 600 million, it also promised to review its systems to make them more robust. It was agreed that in case of discrepancies between UIDAI and NPR data, NPR would prevail.

In his latest letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last week, Chidambaram accused the Nandan Nilekani-led UIDAI of not following the 27 January cabinet decision in which it was agreed that the purposes of UIDAI and the home ministry-led NPR project were different.

“Despite these directions from the government of India, UIDAI is objecting to the conduct of the NPR camps in certain states and is also refusing to accept the biometric data of NPR for de-duplication and generation of (the) Aadhaar numbers,” he said in the letter, which was reviewed by Mint.
Chidambaram further said that the NPR project was almost at a standstill due to the UIDAI refusal. UIDAI, which had begun the second phase of enrolment, has so far collected details of 200 million people and has issued around 177.3 million numbers. It is mandated to issue 600 million UIDs by 2014.
Sahil Makkar contributed to this story.