In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, February 2, 2013

2873 - Let everyone suffer cash transfer, say Kotkasim beneficiaries




MAHIM PRATAP SINGH


In Kotkasim village in Alwar, Rajasthan, where a pilot project for cash transfer was launched in last December, residents often ask that the scheme be extended to all parts of the state so that everyone suffers like they do. Had finance minister P. Chidambaram not cancelled his trip to Kotkasim planned for December 15, he would have received several such “requests”.

Under the direct cash transfer scheme, beneficiaries receive the subsidy amount in cash into their bank accounts and use that to purchase kerosene from the Fair Price Shops at the regular market price.

“I have not received any cash at all ever since last December, neither has my brother” says Rajendra Kumar (41) of Tiganwa village.

His friend Hariprasad, who has a tailoring shop in Bibirani, received his first cash transfer only last week.

“Earlier, we tried purchasing kerosene with our own money, but could not afford it beyond a point. So we started purchasing on borrowed ration cards from other blocks which still have the old system,” says Hariprasad.

“The rations shops are stocked up with months of kerosene supply, but people are not buying any as those who really need it have not received the cash and most of those who did receive it are not even regular buyers. They are using it for other purposes,” he says.

The major problem with the pilot scheme, therefore, is the delay in transfers.

Under the previous system, in case the head of the household was sick, or disabled or unable to move due to old age or otherwise, he/she could send someone else to buy rations.

However, to withdraw the cash subsidy, the account holder is required to be physically present at the bank, which has made it useless for old-age card holders as several bank branches are located 8-15 km from their villages.

Officials admit it as a limitation of “brick-and-mortar-banks” but hope it would be resolved once the Business Correspondent (BC) system is in place.

The official response focuses on proving the scheme a grand success.

“Yes, there were a few hiccups during the first eight months but since the last three months everything is online and the scheme has proved to be a success. Earlier, the off take was 84 kilolitres of kerosene a month but now it is barely a 100 kilolitres for nine months leading to savings worth over Rs. 2 crore,” says Supply Inspector Banwari Lal Sharma.

On their part, the officials blame the FPS dealers for advertising the pilot as a failure. The new arrangements have drastically reduced hoarding and black marketing of kerosene, so naturally the dealers are complaining, they say.

“Kerosene sales have dropped drastically while the commission has remained unchanged. Our main demand is a hike in commission,” says Suraj Bhan, president of the FPS association of Kotkasim.

An insider’s critique

A report prepared by the District Supply Officer (DSO), Alwar, highlights several areas where the pilot scheme falls short.

There are 25,843 ration card holders in Kotkasim district. However, bank accounts for the cash transfer have been opened only for 13,458 card holders – a little over 50%. Villagers asked to use their post office accounts, which were rejected as these accounts do not have online services.

Other reasons for the less-than-enthusiastic response of people towards the pilot, as pointed out in the report, were: distance of banks from the villages, opening of accounts only in the name of head of the household among others. In the latter case, if the head of the household was infirm or was no more, accounts could not be opened.

Ever since the pilot took off, barring January this year, there has been a continuous decline of sale of kerosene.

A major cause of this was erratic transfer patterns. Several consumers, despite not buying kerosene, received double subsidy while there were others who in spite of buying kerosene for more than six months were deprived of the subsidy amount.

Further, since there was no increase in the commission of FPS owners, they lost interest in selling kerosene and even ended up preventing sale of kerosene.