In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, March 3, 2013

3100 - The birthing pains for an Aadhaar



Author: Nivedita K G | ENS
  • Published Date: Mar 2, 2013 9:19 AM
  • Last Updated: Mar 2, 2013 9:19 AM
Most people said the government should open more centres in the city so that the process of getting an Aadhaar does not turn into a nightmare.

With the government making it mandatory to possess an Aadhaar card, the queues at Aadhaar centres, albeit not commensurate with the demographics, has been growing as big as Lord Hanuman’s tail. People standing in long queues with the required documents along with an application form is a common scene in most of the centres. The citizens’ main grouse was that there were not enough centres or counters or even manpower to manage the surging crowds as well as help the people to complete the formalities. Most people said the government should open more centres in the city so that the process of getting an Aadhaar does not turn into a nightmare.

When City Express interacted with Ashok Dalwai, Deputy Director General and Kishan Kumar Sharma, Assistant Director General of UiDAI, Bangalore with respect to the problems people face at the centres, they spoke at length about the increase in number of centres, about the errors committed in the card and others.

Speaking about the increase in number of counters in the city, Kishan said, “Attempts are being made to ramp up the capacity to cope with the demand for enrolment within Bangalore. As of now, approximately 300 enrolment stations have been deployed. The attempt is to increase the number to 600. Centre for E-Governance, Government of Karnataka is the nodal department for Aadhaar project.”

When asked if the requirements are made flexible in the recent times, Ashok added, “Enrolment of residents and generation of Aadhaar is subject to certain standard operating procedures which include provision of a valid proof of identity and address. Capture of biometric data is an intrinsic component of Aadhaar generation. It would thus, not be possible to dispense with these requirements.”

People in the city have been complaining about the errors in the card and this has led them to question the credibility of the card. “It is acknowledged that there are instances of errors in data capture. In order to avoid and minimise such incidents, UIDAI has a quality control system which includes 100 per cent check of data after upload as well as end of day check by supervisors. However, the first point of check has to be at the time of enrolment itself. Every resident is advised to personally check the details captured by the data entry operator before the enrolment is completed. This is facilitated by providing an additional monitor (screen) for the resident. Further, the information in the consent slip needs to be read by the resident carefully before he or she signs it and returns it to the operator. The resident can also make changes to the enrolment data within 96 hours of enrolment,” explained Ashok.

Inappropriate behaviour by the authorities in the counters have also been brought to the notice of the authorities. “Physical comfort and courteous treatment of the residents are emphasised time and again by UIDAI. However, instances of inappropriate behaviour at the enrolment stations have come to note and whenever, such instances do occur, it is taken up with the concerned agency,” Kishan signed off.

The 12-unique numbers
The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) established in 2009 aims to provide a unique id number in order to maintain a database of residents containing biometric and other data. UIDAI, an agency of government of India which is responsible for implementing the  unique identification project, came up with a project to issue the 12-digit unique number to all the residents of India. This number will be stored in a centralised database and linked to the basic demographics and biometric information of every individual. Another aim of the UIDAI is to address the issue of illegal immigration into the country and terrorist threats.

UIDAI launched Aadhaar programme in the tribal village, Tembhli, in Shahada, Maharashtra on 29 September 2010.  The unique identification number promises to provide effective governance, besides providing identity. This will also facilitate entry for poor and underprivileged residents into the formal banking system and also ensures the easy distribution of benefits of government schemes.