In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 11, 2013

3126 - Aadhar should be led by less glamorous person


11 MAR, 2013, 04.28AM IST, ET BUREAU 

Almost every fortnight, Nandan Nilekani knocks on the doors of the Reserve Bank to push his case for making Aadhaar an easy gateway to a bank account. He has reached a frontier that, when crossed, could multiply the number of Indians, untouched by high-street banks, to have accounts. 

An inexpensive technology to execute this exists: the fingerprint of the person with a 12-digit individual identification number is all a bank's business correspondent needs to verify her name and address from the Aadhaar server and transmit the data to the bank that opens the account; in 15 minutes, a machine that costs Rs 15,000 can spew out a card carrying the account number and the bank's name. 

Nilekani is a patient man who has managed to save his baby whenever caught in political cross-fire. His charm, impeccable credentials and backing by powers-that-be may help him convince the RBI. It may take a while, but it's a smaller problem compared to another danger. 

It has nothing to do with Nilekani's achievements. It's about how the world is beginning to perceive him. There is a risk that his proximity to the Gandhis, presence at a Youth Congress convention, his perceived political ambition, praise from Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, and the government's decision to transfer cash subsidy to holders of Aadhaar under the direct benefit scheme may cast a shadow on the ambitious project. 

Some of it is unavoidable. As the chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India, Nilekani has to brief Sonia Gandhi, the chairperson of the National Advisory Council, hold meetings with Rahul Gandhi and other Congressmen, and face awaiting photographers. 

Unlike the customary "silent period" corporate executives use to avoid publicity — something Nilekani too practised at Infosys  — he can't avoid the media glare now. He could even be enjoying it. As one who spearheads the project, and feels strongly about it, it's only natural that he defends Aadhaar when someone questions the concept. 

But not always has Nilekani maintained the typical silence of a quiet professional. By hitting out at Arvind Kejriwal in a news channel to claim that Aadhaar is a more effective tool in the battle against corruption than campaigns and new laws, he clubs himself, even if unwillingly, with Manish Tewari and Digvijaya Singh, who minced no words in running down the Jantar Mantar crusaders. In an age of breathless media coverage, such images stick. 

A lot of it could be unintended. As someone who has been the poster boy of the Indian IT industry and volunteered to "help" the government, the media will chase him for sound bites even on subjects unconnected to Aadhaar. Occasionally, they will ask him whether he nurtures political ambitions. Nilekani will either deny, or wear his trademark smile. He may get away with the gesture, but it may not help his dream project. 

Except for his home state Karnataka, other BJP states haven't welcomed Aadhaar. While the BJP hasn't trashed it, it hasn't found Aadhaar either novel or transformational. This is plain politics as politicians are canny enough to sense that it's one of those projects that can be a meeting point for economics and populism. 

All this is happening at a time when India is at the cusp of a mobile-banking boom with banks, telcos and technology providers trying to find solutions that make transactions from handsets less wieldy. These disparate players have to converge with Aadhaar. 

It's a long road and it's too late for the Congress to reap the rewards in 2014. Aadhaar must reach a critical mass and receive the backing of the next government to make a meaningful difference. Such support cannot be taken for granted. 

The project has taken a political hue and for its progress, Aadhaar should be led by a professional who is perceived to be apolitical — someone as committed as Nilekani but less glamorous; one as hardworking but not as frequently interviewed as Nilekani is. 

Before election fever grips the country and Nilekani finds himself more and more photographed with Congress leaders, he should ceremoniously pass on the baton to such a successor. 

Those who know Nilekani say that after leaving Infosys, he has never talked about the company where he was CEO and a co-founder. A year from now, he should leave someone else to do the talking for Aadhaar.