In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, March 15, 2013

3131 - Standing committee calls for Aadhaar card for street vendors




The Street Vendors Bill, 2012, is the first attempt to regulate urban street hawkers
Anuja & Neha Sethi   |  Neha Sethi  
          First Published: Wed, Mar 13 2013. 09 05 PM IST

The committee has also recommended a provision within the Bill for renewing vending certificate every three years. Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint



New Delhi: India’s more than 10 million street vendors should be registered on the basis of their Aadhaar numbers to ensure proper identification, a standing committee has recommended in its report on the Street Vendors Bill, 2012.

“The Aadhaar card may be linked towards identification of street vendors,” the panel said in the report it submitted to the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, adding that municipal authorities could later undertake a comprehensive digitalized photo survey or census of existing vendors.

An official in the urban housing and poverty alleviation ministry, however, said this may not be feasible yet. “Not everyone in the country has the (Aadhaar) number and we want to be a little liberal for identification till the time everyone gets a number,” the official said, requested anonymity.

The Bill is the first attempt in the country to regulate urban street hawkers and spell out their rights. It makes registration of street vendors mandatory in addition to providing a dispute redressal mechanism and preventing their harassment. The Bill also says that urban local bodies will prepare a plan to “promote a supportive environment” for street vending in cities.

The Bill was earlier taken up by Congress president Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council, which sets the government’s social agenda.

The committee’s other recommendations include issuing more than one vending certificate to mobile street vendors and ensuring they carry out their “own old business” in case of relocation.

“The committee feels that the mobile vendors are most susceptible amongst the vendors. Therefore, they should be issued such a certificate/licence that categorically allows them to carry on their business freely,” the panel said. It also suggested a “clear time period of one month” for issuing vending certificates to prevent procedural delays.
The committee recommended a provision within the Bill for renewing vending certificate every three years. “The committee strongly feels that in the absence of a specific provision, the local bodies may renew the certificate of vending as per their whims, which may lead to harassment of street vendors,” it said.

The panel suggested including a provision for the legal heirs of street hawkers to inherit vending rights where the original registered vendor has died or faces a serious illness or permanent disability. The panel also sought to increase the notice period of eviction and relocation from a week to a month.

“The recommendations of the standing committee are satisfactory and most of our concerns have been accepted. We just hope that the United Progressive Alliance government does not further delay and ensure that the Bill gets passed in the current session itself,” said Ranjit Abhigyan, programme manager at the National Association of Street Vendors of India, a collective of hawker organizations.