In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, April 5, 2013

3210 - State set to roll out Aadhaar-based head count in schools



KOCHI, April 5, 2013
M. P. PRAVEEN

The State government is set to introduce the Unique Identification number (Aadhaar)-based student count to replace the mandatory sixth day head count in government schools at the start of every academic year.

This may save the situation where the education department officials are often taken for a ride by many government schools. The schools in their desperation to save teachers’ posts bring in students just for the day of inspection.
However, the exodus of students from government and aided schools to unaided schools has not been addressed. Inviting fresh admissions could have deterred the teaching community from fabricating numbers.

V. Karthikeyan, former director of Higher Secondary Education and chairman of the SCERT textbook preparation committee that recommended new social science textbooks for class IX and X a couple of years back, blamed the situation on the loss of trust in the government education sector and poor teaching standards.

“That trust deficit dates back to the emergence of a middle class that held the perception that education bought at a cost was of better quality. This started in the 1970s, as reflected in the State’s first unaided school that was started in 1972,” he said.

The cardinal rule that the quality of education depends on the quality of teachers suffers in the present system where graduates are qualified for teaching at high school level. “While they may be qualified they need not be competent. For instance, the social science textbooks at the high school level deals with subjects, including history, geography, economics, political science, sociology, and Islamic history. The problem is that a teacher graduated in one of these subjects may not have learned the rest of the subjects as subsidiaries but are forced to teach them in a classroom as a result of which the quality suffers,” Mr. Karthikeyan said.

B. Iqbal, former Vice-Chancellor of Kerala University and an academician, vouch for the quality of State syllabus and teachers. It was the perception about government schools among the middle class that needed to be corrected, he said.

“When strikes like the recent one by government employees disrupt the functioning of government schools, the unaided schools function uninterrupted. That only goes on to reaffirm that perception. Teachers and students’ organisations will do well to adopt a stand that effects a change in perception,” he said.

Mr. Iqbal didn’t spare the unaided English medium schools starting from kindergarten, which he regarded as the flag bearers of the concept of self-financing in education, holding them responsible for a generation proficient neither in Malayalam nor English. “Everyone is making a hue and cry over the neglect of Malayalam but the fact is that our English is in an even more pitiable state. Even the Malayali nurses who dominated the nursing sector abroad are beginning to lose out to nurses from Philippines who are more proficient in English,” he said.

Former Education Minister M.A. Baby said there were many government schools across the State that have recorded increase in students’ intake while blaming the average Malayali’s superstition about English speaking skills for the poor state of the public education sector. He cited unchecked allotment of unaided schools, diversion of Sarva Shiksha Abhyan funds, and the government failure in providing timely infrastructure support to government schools. Mr. Baby said it was the previous LDF government that took a policy decision to sanction teacher’s posts in schools registering an increase in student’s intake. Till then posts were not allowed in the name of protected teachers elsewhere who didn’t bother to join these schools. “Ideally there should be a common, quality education system so that students passing out held a common perception about social values. We are creating a class difference by having different education systems,” Mr. Baby said.