In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, April 11, 2013

3226 - Just Rs.40 cr disbursed via direct cash transfer




A A  SANTOSH TIWARI: NEW DELHI, APR 09 2013, 00:20 IST
Tags: UPA Government | Direct Benefit Transfer | Welfare Schemes | Business News

The UPA government has pinned its hopes on the direct benefit transfer (DBT) scheme, its likely plank for the next general elections, to reduce the cost of welfare schemes and said this would help slash the Centre’s subsidy bill itself by a whopping 70%. But given the slow pace of its rollout, the Aadhaar-enabled scheme might prove unequal to the task.

Consider: The government has succeeded in disbursing only R40 crore through the DBT scheme in 43 selected districts during January-March. The scheme has been introduced in these districts in three phases from January 1. A senior official told FE that under the DBT scheme, which covered 26 entitlements in the first phase of the scheme, R40 crore had been transferred to the beneficiaries’ bank accounts, mostly scholarships and benefits of health schemes.

In most of these districts selected for DBT launch, Aadhaar penetration is now either more than the required 80% level, or is fast getting there. The reason for the poor performance is not the lack of Aadhaar penetration, it is the poor coordination between various departments. An Aadhaar number is useless unless the relevant department gives names of beneficiaries and the bank account to which the money is to be transferred directly, and in cases where beneficiaries don’t have bank accounts, the coordinating agency needed to ensure the bank account got created.

Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, who has been one of the top government functionaries associated with formulation and implementation of DBT, said, “The amount is small but this is just the beginning. By the end of the year you will see a real big build-up.”

Pointing out that DBT was a multi-dimensional system which required a lot of coordination and technical work, Ahluwalia added that this was just the for first quarter and in 43 districts only, and even at this rate, the annual amount would be about R600 crore.

Considering the fact that payment of subsidies on the LPG head alone would mean the transfer of about R4,000 per year to the accounts of the holders of 14 crore connections, which the government is embarking upon next; the current performance on DBT falls miserably short of the expected results. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last week declared that the DBT scheme would be rolled out in 78 more districts effective July 1, and that the Aadhar-enabled scheme would soon be used to disburse LPG subsidy as well.

The Nandan Nilekani Task Force in its report to the government in February last year had suggested that the government shift entitlement and subsidies payments adding up to R3 lakh crore, or roughly 3.5% of GDP, and also R1 lakh crore worth of remittances, to the Aadhaar-enabled unified payment infrastructure.

While the Prime Minister had clearly hinted at teething troubles coming in the way of a speedy implementation of the scheme at a high-level meeting last week to analyse the performance of the first phase and prepare a road map for extending it to other districts, finance minister P Chidambaram skirted questions on the total amount disbursed into the beneficiary accounts by saying it was modest and stressed that problems would be overcome in the coming months.

The finance minister said that the government would achieve its goal provided the problems were addressed. The government has now decided to roll it out in 78 more districts in the same 26 schemes, which will take the number of districts with DBT to 121, roughly covering 20% of the country.

Officials handling the scheme pointed out that the government was facing several problems in implementing the scheme at the ground level beginning with seeding of the correct beneficiary data to opening of the bank accounts and then in transferring the payments to the real beneficiaries’ bank accounts. They added that assimilation of Aadhaar identification for transfer of money to the beneficiary accounts was also an issue till all the beneficiaries in the selected districts get Aadhaar numbers.

The Prime Minister had remarked at the DBT stock-taking meeting last week, "We have come some distance since direct benefits transfer programme was rolled out in January. In this period, we have resolved a number of operational issues. I am encouraged by this progress and hopeful about the future. But we have also run into difficulties that we had not anticipated when we began the programme. We must therefore renew our efforts for successful implementation of the programme.”

Direct blow
* Lack of coordination between ministries & banks led to low disbursement through DBT
* Problems in seeding of correct beneficiary data, opening a/cs & transfers to real beneficiaries
* Most of the transfers to bank a/cs of beneficiaries related to scholarship & health schemes