In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 9, 2013

4579 - THE BIOMETRICS IDENTIFICATION IMBROGLIO by S.G.Vombatkere

THE BIOMETRICS IDENTIFICATION IMBROGLIO
By
S.G.Vombatkere**

Providing direct benefit transfer (DBT) is based primarily on authentication of an individual's biometrics against stored biometric data captured on enrolment, by employing specialized hardware at every disbursing point, every time an individual seeks to obtain a benefit. Thus, hi-tech electronic hardware with backup power (battery and inverter) must be provided to every ration shop, MNREGA centre, every centre where salaries and pensions are paid, etc., across the country. If one does the arithmetic, it might mean billions of pieces of electronic hardware, each one of them needing an electric power source, and enormous expenditure for initial cost and maintenance-repair. Great days ahead for those who work out the contracts!

UIDAI is India's flagship primemover for the biometrics identification Aadhaar mega-scheme for India's 1.25 billion inhabitants. It captures ten fingerprints and iris scan, though authentication is done by thumbprint alone. However, the Mission Director and DG of UIDAI, Mr R S Sharma, in an interview with “Frontline” in November 2011, had said, "Capturing fingerprints, especially of manual labourers, is a challenge. The quality of fingerprints is bad because of the rough exterior of fingers caused by hard work, and this poses a challenge for later authentication. ... Issuing a unique identity will not be a major problem. But authentication will be, because fingerprint is the basic mode of authentication." [Usha Ramanathan; “Best finger first, but let's now scan the eye”; <http://www.thestatesman.net/news/4789-Best-finger-first—but-let-s-now-scan-the-eye.html>; The Statesman; July 10, 2013]. In fact, reports from across the country keep coming in about biometrics problems at both capture and authentication stages, especially for old people and people whose fingers are worn out for various reasons, precisely as anticipated by Mr.R.S.Sharma in his weak moment of truthful admission.

Firsthand demonstration of this was provided by checking out a complaint from Ms.Chikkathayamma of Kumbarakoppal, Mysore. (Incidentally, Mysore is where UIDAI conducted the pilot for biometrics-based Aadhaar identification). On August 29, 2013, this writer accompanied the lady, a domestic worker, to the PDS outlet where she drew her rations. Her thumbprint had not been “registering” and so she had to repeatedly go to the ration shop, and spend hours each time, but still could not draw her rice ration. The PDS ration shop owner agreed that her thumbprint was indeed not being “accepted” by the machine, that about 20-25 persons who come to his shop have the same problem, and that these unfortunate persons are either old, or construction or agricultural workers. This was confirmed the same day from other PDS shop owners in the area. Thus, out of around 300 people who draw ration from one shop, around 20 (6%), the very people who need it the most, are disadvantaged.

It is interesting that ration was being issued on the basis of biometrics captured by Government of Karnataka (GoK) to issue new ration cards, and not by adopting the Aadhaar biometric capture. That is, every ration card holder in Karnataka has to provide full biometrics to the GoK agency for ration even if he/she has already enrolled in Aadhaar. In another case, Shantha (name changed) of Paduvarahalli, Mysore, also a domestic worker known to this writer, has not received any PDS ration since the new ration cards came into use. Reason: The system was unable to capture her biometrics, and so she has no valid ration card. Thus the unreliability of biometrics both at the capturing and authentication stages, especially for the already disadvantaged, takes most of the wind out of the sails of governments' schemes that are touted to streamline the system and remove corruption. Indeed, Shantha already possesses an Aadhaar card, but that does her no good for PDS ration!
UIDAI's Proof of Concept Report (PoC) concerning biometrics states, "... although currently only fingerprint biometric is being offered ... it is likely that in the near future iris biometric authentication will also be supported." It concludes, "Low cost iris capture devices are becoming available in the market. A combination of fingerprint and iris is expected to improve accuracy by a factor of 10 to 100, while reducing failure to enrol (red fingers) rate by a factor of 10. A detailed study such as this should be done on iris authentication." Thus this report lends context to Mr. Nilekani's statement at the Centre for Global Development in Washington in April 2013, about having "created huge opportunity for fingerprint scanners, iris readers". [Usha Ramanathan; “Best finger first, but let's now scan the eye”; <http://www.thestatesman.net/news/4789-Best-finger-first—but-let-s-now-scan-the-eye.html>; The Statesman; July 10, 2013]. This leads one to wonder if making biometrics as the basis for identification was really to give a filip to the industries that produce the capture and authentication devices, and the batteries and inverters to provide backup power.

Rs.12,398 crores has been sanctioned by the union government for Aadhaar and similar amounts are being spent by state governments for their own schemes (example, GoK ration cards). It is unsurprising that governments are interested to spend huge sums, what with kickbacks etc. being the order of the day. With biometrics being essentially unreliable, and consequent dissatisfaction of the poorest people, it might appear that the CAG of ten years or so hence, will have his/her hands full!


** Major General S.G. Vombatkere retired as the Additional Director General, Discipline & Vigilance in Army HQ, New Delhi. The President of India awarded him the Visishta Seva Medal in 1993 for distinguished service rendered over 5 years in Ladakh. He holds a PhD degree in Structural Dynamics from IIT, Madras. He is Adjunct Associate Professor of the University of Iowa, USA, and is a member of NAPM and PUCL. He writes on strategic and development-related issues.

Contact details:
Maj Gen S.G.Vombatkere (Retd) /

E-mail: <sg9kere@live.com>