In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 30, 2013

4718 - AADHAAR’S IDENTITY CRISIS - News Laundry



POSTED BY ARUNABH SAIKIA | SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

So what’s all this news I’ve been hearing about some magic Utopian card? Yes yes, make fun of it all you want. But the Aadhaar card was thought of as a way of providing a unique identity for every resident of India, Non Resident Indian (NRI) or any foreign citizen residing in India of India. Like the social security number in America.

Oh, so was the Aadhaar card also going to come along with a gift pack of food, electricity and potable water for each citizen? It’s cynics like you who do our country in. What’s the harm in dreaming of a better world? According to the Aadhaar scheme, each citizen of India would be given an identification number of 12 digits for the purpose of establishing a unique identity for every single person in the country. The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), a part of the Planning Commission, is responsible for implementing the scheme. And Nandan Nilekani, former co-chairman of Infosys Technologies, was appointed as the first Chairman of UIDAI in June 2009 – a position he continues to hold till date.

What a delightful plan. But why is everyone claiming that the Supreme Court has put a spanner in the Aadhaar works? The Court was actually just responding to a PIL filed by retired Karnataka High Court judge, Justice KS Puttaswamy. It ruled that Aadhaar Cards cannot be made mandatory to avail essential services and the government should exercise a little caution in issuing the cards – and definitely not distribute them among illegal migrants. This was because the PIL by the retired judge voiced concerns about Aadhaar Cards being given away to illegal migrants by the government.

What? But I thought the Aadhaar would be my pass to the grandest free feast of our times – the Food Security program. Not for the time being at least. If you’ve received your Aadhaar card, you can use it as proof of identity. The Supreme Court hasn’t commented on the validity of the Aadhaar Card as identity proof yet. So while you can’t have a feast thanks to it, you can get a gas connection.

What’s the hullaballoo in the media orchard about then? The hullaballoo isn’t totally unwarranted. The UIDAI (read Nandan Nilekani – chairman and poster boy of the UIDAI) which pretty much claimed that Aadhaar Cards will change the way things run in this country and that this will be a single uniform proof of identity across the country has put in a whopping Rs 3,735 Crore into the project as of July 31, 2013. But with the Supreme Court saying that the Aadhaar is not mandatory (which essentially reduces it to just another ID proof like a drivers’ license or a PAN card), the entire exercise has been reduced to just another humungous waste of money and time.

Bugger all, are you telling me that I spent that half day getting my picture taken and standing in line, just for another ID card? To add to my ration card, passport, PAN card, Voter ID card, driver’s license and gym card? Well, the premise of that card was that a centralised database would link all your other cards like the passport, driver’slicense, ration card, SC/ST card etc to your unique identification number. One card that fits all.

 But what if the database crashes? Aah, ye of little brain. Before it can crash, the database has to be compiled. And if that somehow did happen, shouldn’t you be asking how the government plans on digitally sharing data when almost 40 percent of rural India doesn’t even have electricity?

Say what you will, but Nilekani’s plan has almost won me over in spite of me. The idea of a single mobile identity sounds really cool if the database issue is sorted out. Well, the idea is undoubtedly most grand.  But then we live in a country where what exists in black and white very rarely gets replicated on the ground. And a project as ambitious as the UID comes with an entire range of teething troubles. The Supreme Court’s judgment, addresses just one of them – Aadhaar Cards being given away to illegal immigrants. Take a state like Assam which has very serious issues with illegal immigration, the problem could assume unmanageable proportions and have very far-reaching repercussions. Also, one cannot possiblydismiss illegal immigration as just one of those minor issues that comes along with all big projects.

This mega project – however noble and visionary it may be – has very little clarity of execution. And that is something which makes or breaks projects.  Hardly surprising though, since the Ministry of Planning has itself admitted that no committee had been constituted to study the financial implications of the scheme and it was given a go-ahead without a detailed project report. In fact, the whole project technically has no legal backing at all as it has been running through an executive order and the Parliament is yet to pass the National Identification Authority of India Bill.

Classy! I expected no less from our government. And why have people suddenly woken up to these problems? It is strange for a project of this large a scale to have come such a long way without any serious scrutiny – but apparently it has. While there have been sporadic protests and objections from time to time, they have not been too organised and scathing enough to have any real impact. Also, the fact that different people have expressed doubts over different issues has resulted in individual concerns getting diluted. While a section has vociferously argued that the biometrics involved in the project will lead to a compromise on personal privacy, many have said that the idea itself is pointless. But no one has looked at the deficiencies or inefficiencies of the Aadhar Card in a holistic manner.

So what happens now? Is the government going to let the Aadhaar juggernaut carry on rolling? Well, Nilekani is definitely rolling on. He claimed just this month that all citizens will have an Aadhaar card by 2014 and they’ll be able to use them online. Because that’s just what villagers want to do, open their non-existent iPads and laptops and make bank transfers and pay bill for their non-existent mobile bills.

The government seems to be “rattled” according to news reports and wants the Supreme Court to modify the order by making Aadhaar mandatory to avail social welfare schemes which are heavily subsidised by the government. The government however still insists that it is a “voluntary” project.

What an utterly ambiguous stand. Only fitting, going by how ambiguous the Aadhaar scheme is.


Contact-Arunab-Saikia-Newslaundry1