In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, September 27, 2013

4626 - No Aadhaar, no rations? - Deccan Chronicles


DC | Darshana Ramdev | 19th Sep 2013


Bengaluru: People holding Below Poverty Line cards were in shock on Wednesday when fair price shop owners refused to hand over monthly rations unless they produced an Aadhar card.

Officials reached for comment said that ration shop owners may have seriously misconstrued a recent state government order. Be that as it may, BPL card holders left without their rations. The shops’ directive also has triggered a mad rush for the Aadhaar and UIDAI centers across the city, which has already seen twice as many applicants over the last two weeks.

For several of the applicants at the UIDAI center in Malleswaram on Wednesday afternoon, the wait has been over seven hours long. "We all have our ration cards, but the shop owners don’t want them.

They are willing to accept a stamped Aadhaar application, though, that’s why we’re here. We have been waiting since 6 am,” said Lakshmi (name changed), who works as a coolie here in the city. Their efforts, however, are hampered by the fact that the UIDAI office only sees 60 applicants a day.

“One litre of kerosene costs about Rs 70, how can we afford that?” asks one domestic worker from Srirampuram. Oddly, however, a handful of people said they hadn’t even approached fair price shop owners, as they were convinced they would be turned away. 

A UIDAI official, who did not want to be named, said, “These people haven’t been getting their rations without a UIDAI number. We normally have about 100 applicants each day, but in the last two weeks, it’s been closer to 200.”
A senior member from the Fair Price Shop Owners’ Association said there has been confusion over whether or not Aadhar cards are mandatory for the Anna Bhagya Scheme. “The government has asked us to consider Aadhar cards as we distribute kerosene. It isn’t compulsory at the moment, however. The government recently said that the Anna Bhagya scheme may be linked to Aadhar. This has only fueled speculation and led to a rush for Aadhar cards,” he said.

Food and Civil Supplies Minister, Dinesh Gundurao, admitted to confusion in parts of Bengaluru and Tumkur. “The state government’s order has been misinterpreted,” he said. “We told BPL card holders to furnish the UIDAI number, but it is not connected with rations being handed out,’ he stressed. ‘This was a way to get them to enroll, although right now, rations are not being held back.’

Gundurao said the Aadhaar will be made compulsory for collecting rations, although this is still a few months down the line. “Right now, the UIDAI number, which is on the application form, will suffice. They don’t need to have an Aadhaar card right now. It will be made compulsory in about three months, but people will be given enough notice,” he explained.

As for people being refused rations, Gundurao said, “Some fair price shop owners have threatened consumers, telling them that they will not get their rations without the UIDAI number. They have been asked to clarify the issue immediately.”