In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 9, 2013

4586 - Government controls under guise of welfare by V.Balachandran- Sunday Guardian


POLICE & STATE


We had thought that the reforms undertaken since the early 1990s in our country would have ushered in an era of less governmental control over its citizens in their everyday life. Sadly, that has not happened. Under the guise of welfare measures, government has tightened its stranglehold over common citizens and made their lives more miserable. The beneficiaries have been mostly middlemen and corrupt government servants. In the 1990s, a ration card or a passport was the primary identity document for all. Those who needed could draw food rations and kerosene for cooking by displaying this card. They could also obtain passports, obtain school admission for their children and purchase vehicles. The scare of a massive Bangladesh infiltration into India during the NDA regime (1999-2004) made government change this policy and insist on voters' identity cards. By that time, lakhs of bogus ration cards were circulated by corrupt government servants. In 2011, Maharashtra proudly declared that 42 lakh bogus cards were circulating in the state.

We had thought that voters' identity cards or passports would be the final solution to all our identity problems. That was not to be. The UPA government introduced the "Aadhar" scheme in a hurry, without legal backing, even as data for the "National Population Register" under the Citizenship Act was being collected by the Ministry of Home Affairs. In their hurry to be populist, UPA's political managers did not care about this contradiction. "Aadhar" was introduced with all its defects to gain oneupmanship over other political parties in the so-called welfare measures. Some suspicious persons also tried to claim Indian citizenship based on "Aadhar" cards, which, fortunately, was laid to rest in a recent case by the Bombay High Court, stating that "Aadhar" or even Indian passports did not prove that they are Indian citizens unless their parents were also Indian citizens. However, this may recoil on the UPA coalition since the promised benefits have not yet started flowing to the needy due to the mismatch between promises (glitzy television commercials promising a better life for the poor) and the hard reality on the ground, when thousands of the needy are still waiting for their cards. Despite all the soothing tales by Congress politicians, there is tremendous frustration among the poor, who are being exploited by middlemen for obtaining new cards to avail of the so called benefits. Do the Congress party managers feel that this would result in more votes?

Ordinarily, such thoughtless administrative steps would inconvenience only the general public and not government servants. However, I found a strange thing happening in the Congress-NCP ruled Maharashtra, which has started collecting fresh data on all their Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe employees, including very low paid government servants. The procedure is so tortuous that they have to fill up a five-page form indicating their father's and grandfather's names, with their caste details and attaching certificates from the tahsildars after digging out authentic government records from their villages located far away from their places of posting. A 55-year-old low paid employee, recruited in 1983, who is working as a watchman in a local government office, told me that he has to travel a day's distance to his village in the hope of retrieving the records. If he does not produce the records, his next month's salary will not be paid.

Middlemen are already approaching him with tantalising offers on how to get certificates for cash.

It is not clear why the government is compiling such data 30 years after his recruitment. Is this because of some court decisions like, say in the Supreme Court case State Of Maharashtra vs. Milind & Ors on 28 November 2000, setting aside the Scheduled Tribe status of the respondent? Why could the government not explain the necessity of this fresh verification to their employees before subjecting them to such hardship even after 30 years of government service?

I did not read anything about this strange development in the local media. The biggest irony is that this is coming just before the 2014 general elections when all political parties would deck themselves as guardian angels of SC & ST population in trying to garner their votes.