In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, September 13, 2013

4592 - Cash transfer reaches just 10% of test population - TNN


Overall, in a presentation made to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last month, it emerged that a little over half of the population identified for 25 schemes in 121 districts, where pilots are being run, had bank accounts.
Sidhartha, TNN | Sep 10, 2013, 01.29AM IST

NEW DELHI: Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) was supposed to be a game-changer ahead of the 2014 general elections, with the government planning to plug leakages by transferring cash directly into the accounts of beneficiaries and hoping to cash in on their goodwill. But eight months down the line, it is discovering that the grand plan has run into bureaucratic walls and the beneficiaries are not ready to be part of the cash transfer architecture. 

According to official data, there are at least four schemes where no cash transfers had taken place till early August, the latest period for which data is available. In another four, direct transfers ranged between Rs 2 lakh and Rs 8 lakh. 


Overall, in a presentation made to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last month, it emerged that a little over half of the population identified for 25 schemes in 121 districts, where pilots are being run, had bank accounts. While a quarter had both bank accounts and Aadhaar, there were less than 10% who had them linked. So, till July, effectively less than 10% of the population in the test cases had actually experienced the benefits of direct transfer. 

In case of cooking gas, the petroleum ministry has said that in the 20 districts where a pilot project is underway, 16.6 lakh of the 72.3 lakh consumers - which is around 23% of the target group - are receiving subsidy via DBT. 

The limited success in a majority of the schemes has prompted the government to consider reducing the size of the experiment. Of the 28 schemes identified, two (Dhanalakshmi and National Scheme for Incentive For the Girl Child for Secondary Education) are proposed to be dropped, while another nine may be handed over to the states, several of whom are unwilling to share the list of beneficiaries. 

In many cases, ministries have said that the scheme was ill conceived. For instance, the scheme for the girl child does not involve direct cash transfer. Instead, a fixed deposit is offered to students which can be encashed when they turn 18. Dhanalakshmi has been included in the test run despite the women and child department deciding to wind up the scheme. 

Several ministries have pointed out that in some of the schemes included under DBT funds are often routed through state and district government agencies and do not flow into accounts of beneficiaries. In case of some rural development schemes, the ministry has said that states' contribution is often more than the Centre's. States aren't on board either. For instance, Tamil Nadu has demanded that all funds should be routed through the states, while Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh has said that it is better placed to handle cash transfers. 

The government has also admitted that ministries have not changed the operating protocol to deal with the shift. 

But the government is not giving up just yet despite a host of obstacles. A major stumbling block, officials admitted during the meeting, is opening bank accounts in "difficult pockets". Similarly, it now emerges that the post office banking network is not ready to take a part of the load. For instance, core banking in post offices is behind schedule and tenders for handheld devices, to dispense cash in unbanked areas, were cancelled. "It is not likely that the postal system will be ready for any form of DBT (except in Andhra Pradesh which has a different system in place) till March 2014," the minutes of the meeting chaired by the PM on August 5 said. 

Progress on issuing Aadhaar and National Population Registration is not providing much comfort either. For instance, in 242 of the 650 districts, penetration varies between zero and 10% and the Unique Identification Authority of India has conceded that it will take up to 27 months to issue Aadhaar. Only 160 districts have Aadhaar coverage of over 50%. Similarly, the Registrar General of India has been asked to expedite biometric data collection in states such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chattisgarh, West Bengal, Odisha, Jammu & Kashmir and the North East.