In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

5282 - ‘Virtually unelectable’ Nandan Nilekani eyes unique ID - TNN

Asha Rai, TNN | Mar 10, 2014, 06.40AM IST

BANGALORE: Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani formally joined the Congress party on Sunday as a primary member to contest from the Bangalore South parliamentary constituency in the Lok Sabha election. Nilekani later said it was time for his rival BJP's Ananth Kumar — to go. "There are times in business or politics when one has to go. I think time has come for him to go," 

Nilekani said without taking Ananth Kumar's name in response to queries about what he thought of his prospects over his rival who had been representing the seat since 1996, winning it five consecutive times. 

"I don't see much upside in talking to you — you're neither good for notes (money) nor votes," a politician told Nandan Nilekani when he buttonholed the former with policy ideas when he was running Infosys. 

Nilekani, still, might not be good for notes. But the same politician will see much upside in talking to him today as he's Congress' candidate against BJP heavyweight HN Ananth Kumar in a constituency the grand old party hasn't won in quarter of a century. 

For a self-confessed marathon man, it's been a political sprint. From calling himself "quite unelectable" because being an entrepreneur made him a "long shot in politics," and an "easy target" for populist rhetoric, he's now one of Congress' star candidates. 

Nilekani's shift to Delhi from Bangalore in 2009 looked like a set of random moves which pushed him closer to the inner power circles. 

He landed at the UIDAI accidentally. Nilekani was offered a place at the Planning Commission. He told PM Manmohan Singh he was interested in heading the then little-known department mandated to give ID cards to Indians, a play which suited his technical background. 

After negotiating the soft stuff that matters in Delhi: the right rank (cabinet in this case), right house in the right zone (Safdarjung), Nilekani quit the company he built with Narayana Murthy to be the face of India's software smarts. His aim was to make UID the tool for financial inclusion; the platform for delivery of populist government programmes directly to under-served millions. A man who rejected an offer to buy a Lutyens bunglow for a throwaway Rs 40 crore in the early 2000s because he didn't want people to second-guess his motive for wanting a house in Delhi, has in the same city, today, demonstrated enough political chutzpah to emerge as a viable LS candidate. 

For Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, he ticks many boxes: He's in the Manmohan Singh mould — a technocrat and clean with no political base. He has good equations with their advisers. Business sees him as one of their own. He's a phenomenal networker with Bill Gates/Tom Friedman to Ratan Tata/tech reporter on speed dial. 

He has the right kind of money in the current anticorruption environment acquired through a meritocratic education (IIT Mumbai) and a software enterprise (Infosys) which became a byword for ethical wealth creation. That he wants to give away large chunks of it helps. His wife Rohini (who runs NGOs involved in primary education and water) and he have given close to Rs 350 crore for initiatives to build a brilliant theatre space in Bangalore (Ranga Shankara) to funding a new urban studies university (Indian Institute for Human Settlements). 

His children, students still, are not on the horizon. Daughter Janhavi is a doctoral student at Harvard University. Her husband, Jamshedpur-boy Shray Chandra, is an MBA student at Harvard Business School. Son Nihar is at the University of Wisconsin doing his master's in philosophy. 

Nandan earlier joked Nihar was the only earning member of the family. He had taken up a teaching gig at his alma mater, The Valley School in Bangalore, after graduating from Yale. Nandan donates his salary to the PM's relief fund. Rohini runs NGOs and daughter and son-in-law are still studying, so Nihar's salary made him the only family member to hold a paying job. 

Nilekani, who till he quit Infosys, had seen himself as an 'ideas man', wants to bring about large scale change. He's always believed Infosys was an idea. So was Aaadhar. Nobody really believed — other than him — that in less than five years over 600 million cards would be issued from almost a zero base. 

While Aadhaar faced implementation issues and guerrilla attacks — primarily from Nilekani's own cabinet colleagues — in Bangalore, tech leaders are in awe of what he's pulled off. The scale of the project, the team he put together and the speed at which it was rolled out is unparalleled even in the private sector, say those tracking UID. Being offered an opportunity by Rahul to contest elections coalesced well with his desire to be a legitimate change agent by winning an election. 

By the time news filtered out in mid-September 2013 about him contesting from South Bangalore against Ananth Kumar, work on his candidacy was on. A 60-member team code named Ajay was at work in a Bangalore suburb, polling voters, sampling constituents. 


If the stardust that has rained down on Nilekani through his life were to hold for five more weeks, India might get a Pink Floyd fan with a weakness for dark chocolates and fondness for classics like Casablanca, as a new face in Parliament.