In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, March 14, 2014

5305 - An overhaul required to make Aadhaar citizen-centric - Deccan Herald

N V Krishnakumar, Mar 14, 2014 :

Since its establishment in 2009, there has been much aura and fanfare about the Office of Unique Identity Authority of India (UIDAI).

Headed by IT Czar Nandan Nilekani and popularly known as Aadhaar, citizens are told that there is something in it for everyone. Hence, they must wholeheartedly endorse, support and become stakeholders in the project.

Even before its birth, Aadhaar was touted as a panacea to many of the ills plaguing our country. To the poor and downtrodden, it was a proof of identity. To the well off, it was like the social security number in the United States. To anti-corruption crusaders, it was projected as the best tool to fight corruption. 

To fiscal conservatives, it claimed to help target subsidies better and save government money. To anti-poverty advocates, it was meant to ensure that benefits reach the poor without leakages. To politicians, it is the ‘magic wand’ that will make growth more inclusive and bring every Indian into the banking system.

Over the last four years, more than fifty five crore Aadhaar cards have been issued and pilot programs have begun to test its ostensible capabilities. But a critical question needs to be asked and answered before further expansion - Is Aadhaar citizen centric? More importantly, is it poor people centric? The resounding answer today is no! 

The current design of Unique Identity project is government centric and a bureaucratic nightmare for citizens. Inept service pervades most government departments and procuring benefits through Aadhaar no exception. In its current structure, anyone applying for an Aadhaar card needs to provide an address proof along with a completed form.

Citizens are considered ready for direct cash transfer of government benefits once they have their Aadhaar number linked to either a pre-existing or a newly opened bank account. If a poor man or woman is eligible for five or six different government schemes, he or she has to individually register with each of these schemes or departments with their Aadhaar card to ensure that benefits are transferred to their bank account.

This is akin to entrepreneurs and businessmen running around various government departments to secure approvals to start or expand their business. They are constantly hassled at every step of the way and bribes are demanded by bureaucrats at each level. An Aadhaar card does not assure the poor and downtrodden of this country that they will not be subjected to a similar kind of harassment.

To overcome bureaucratic hurdles, governments implemented a single window clearance process which was an amazing success. A similar approach is needed to disburse entitlements to citizens. Like businessmen, Aam Aadmi expects efficient and effective service delivery from the government and wants to avoid persecution from middlemen and bureaucrats.

Bureaucratic mess

The recent stark failure of LPG subsidy transfer is a glaring example of this bureaucratic mess. UIDAI, Banks and LPG dealers were busy blaming each other while the beneficiaries were left to suffer without any recourse. Mere tinkering with implementation is insufficient and bound to fail. An overhaul is required to make Aadhaar citizen centric and more importantly poor people centric.

For Aadhaar to be successful, office of UIDAI must be converted into a single widow for all welfare benefits. It must create a single form that lists all central, state and local government schemes. Once a form is submitted along with relevant documents, the onus must be on UIDAI office to generate a Unique Identity number, link it to a bank account and procure benefits to citizens.

Such a revamp of the Aadhaar program will provide much needed relief to the aam aadmi from running pillar to post while avoiding harassment and graft. It will also serve as the biggest incentive for citizens to willingly participate allowing the project to surmount major legal hurdles brought on by social activists who have gone to courts opposing its implementation on flimsy grounds.

And by taking a holistic approach, UIDAI can overcome current public resentment, weed out inefficiencies and become an integrated welfare disbursement gateway. Moreover, it will be a boon in the long run when transition of benefits must move to a means tested process to control runaway government expenditure.

An added advantage will be speeding up the process of reforming entitlements. In most states, there are several overlapping central, state and municipal schemes that affect eligibility criteria and befuddle service providers who are increasingly NGO’s and private sector. Guesstimates suggest that there are more than 200 schemes and programs at various levels of government in each state. Listing them in a single form will certainly invite taxpayer backlash which in turn can force government and social activists to rethink and consolidate benefits.

Aadhaar touted as a “Game Changer for the Aam Aadmi” shouldn’t end up as a boondoggle. Its design should be radically altered so that responsibility for all entitlements rests with the UIDAI office.

In a modern technology savvy 21st century India, seamless transfer of  welfare benefits to targeted individuals with minimal bureaucratic involvement is well within the realm of possibilities. 

Government must make it a reality to  accomplish the goals of Unique Identity project.