In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

5355 - Populism not a good aadhaar - Economic Times

Varun Sood, TNN Mar 24, 2014, 01.16PM IST

(Nilekani, who is taking…)

BANGALORE: Nandan Nilekani may be articulating populist ideas for Bangalore, but many experts say implementing them will be a tall order for the Infosys cofounder if he is elected to the Lok Sabha.


Nilekani, 58, who is taking on BJP veteran Ananth Kumar in Bangalore South, has outlined what he calls are his 'five priorities' for India's technology capital in an election where he is fighting anti-incumbency as a candidate of the Congress.

For example, he has promised that his constituents, not he, will decide how Rs 5 crore a year is spent from the MP Local Area Development Scheme. And striking a strident tone, he promises to get more money for the city from New Delhi and agencies such as the World Bank.

"Today, we send a lot of money to Delhi as taxes, but do not get enough back," he wrote in a mini manifesto on his Facebook page.

Rob Jenkins, a veteran on Indian affairs and a teacher at the City University of New York, said Nilekani is unlikely to have success with both issues, because the Central government plays a major role in their implementation and it is not likely that the Congress will return to power.

"He (Nilekani) claims he will persuade the Centre to provide the resources . His success at doing so will in part depend on which party takes power in Delhi, but the prospects for Nilekani's influence in Delhi increasing are extremely bleak," said Jenkins, who specialises in the politics and political economy of India.

Although Jenkins described Nilekani as "a man of integrity", he also observed that the former Infosys CEO's "priorities are too localised due to Nilekani's lack of political experience, being a total novice".

Earlier this month, Nilekani resigned as chairman of the Unique Identity Authority of India, an agency that has issued unique Aadhaar numbers to about 60 crore residents. He published 'Imagining India: The Idea of a Renewed Nation in 2009' and in the same year resigned from Infosys to join the government.

Nilekani, Ananth Kumar and Aam Aadmi Party candidate Nina P Nayak are vying for votes from the 1.6 million residents of constituency that has a strong urban middle-class core with thousands of software industry employees.

Voting takes place on April 17. Nilekani is running a strong campaign against a five-term incumbent who is perceived to be vulnerable .

While the Nilekani camp is convinced that he is the better candidate and is doing its best to project a Nilekani versus Ananth Kumar contest, the BJP veteran is attempting to shift the battle to terrain that is more suitable for him. Ananth Kumar accuses Nilekani of shying away from the Congress and is instead portraying the Bangalore South election as a fight between PM aspirants Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi.

Nilekani, who was a prime mover behind the Bangalore Agenda Task Force civic group, is also dangling a round-the clock call centre to attend to public complaints. Among other measures, he is promising water to every household and "streetlights and footpaths on every road" .


VS Elizabeth, a professor at Bangalore-based National Law School, was of the view that the agenda "appears to be too local" for an election to the national parliament. "I guess he doesn't realise that as an MP, he is not just a representative of his constituency, but a part of the process that makes policy for the entire nation," she said.

However, she credits Nilekani for his idea for interacting with the public every six months to report on what he will be doing if he is elected.

Swati Ramanathan of Jana Urban Space, a Bangalore-based notfor-profit working on urban planning , observed that Nilekani "comes taint-proof on the personal front". She said, "People like Nandan are important to provide impetus to this changing dynamic in electoral outcomes as well as in the mind of the urban voter."