In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

5347 - Endgame Aadhaar? - Business Standard




If you haven't got an Aadhaar card till now, you probably won't need one in near future, at least

Neha Pandey Deoras  |  Mumbai   March 24, 2014 Last Updated at 18:24 IST




If you haven't got an Aadhaar card till now, you probably won't need one in the near future, at least.

As on today, you can open a bank account using your Aadhaar number. You can even get a new mobile number with it. However, when it comes to buying an insurance policy or investing in mutual funds, you will have to back up your Aadhaar card with another government-authorised identification document like Permanent Account Number (PAN). And the role of the card may be limited to these few functions only for the time being.

The plans of the government's to make Aadhaar a one-stop solution for many problems took a serious hit on Monday, when the Supreme Court directed the government to withdraw all orders mandating Aadhaar card for availing any service. The apex court also directed the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to not to share any information pertaining to an Aadhaar cardholder with any government agency without the prior permission of the cardholder.

The role of the card has been diminishing for some time. In September 2013, the Supreme Court had ruled that Aadhaar was not mandatory for essential services such as salary, provident fund disbursals and marriage and property registrations. Last month, the Centre delinked Aadhaar from liquefied petroleum gas (LPGsubsidy. All these led to the Aadhaar's relevance diminishing consistently. Aadhaar had also promised to resolve all the know-your-customer (KYC) issues that consumers faced. But with this direction, the hope seems to be fading.

Says Abizer Diwaji, partner & national leader - financial services at EY, "The government should see there is need to refine this project to make it better. If needed, they should make more changes to Aadhaar to make it a full-proof identity card like is the case with US' social security card."

A former UIDAI official says that the government had never given any executive order to the UIDAI for making Aadhaar mandatory. "Aadhaar is not mandatory for every individual as per the UIDAI policy. It was the individual agencies that made it mandatory like MNREGA, LPG distributors and so on. Aadhaar is like US' social security card, having which will ensure benefit directly go into the bank account or benefits are to be taken in cash," he explained.

He added that cardholders' information sharing is also not allowed as per UIDAI policy. "There were some cases of information sharing on orders from the lower court. Otherwise, UIDAI is not authorised to share cardholders' information with any agency," he explains. The government started linking Aadhaar numbers to various social security schemes, bank accounts, in a way making it compulsory to own an Aadhaar card.

UIDAI officials do agree that the objective of the mega project has gone haywire. Theformer UIDAI official above says it is to be seen that how will the fate of Aadhaar cards pan out once the Parliament passes the Aadhaar Card Bill and it becomes constitutionally valid. "Will the apex court reverse today's judgement then?," he questions.

Given that the Lok Sabha elections are just a month away, the fate of UIDAI is quite unsure, going forward. Some political leaders are in favour of the card whereas others still have doubts.

The question, whether the next government will be keen on taking up the Aadhaar Bill in the Parliament, remains. There is no clarity on this as of now. Therefore, industry experts advise those who don't have an Aadhaar card to wait till the next government comes in and there is some concrete decision on the UIDAI. Those who already own a card should save it for the day the government decides to make it more relevant.