In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

5521 - Direct Benefits Transfer scheme finds no place in Cong’s campaign - Indian Express


According to sources, DBT barely figured in the party’s manifesto consultation process or during discussions. 

Written by Ruhi Tewari | New Delhi | May 5, 2014 2:59 am

Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan at the launch of the scheme in Maharashtra in 2013. (Ganesh Shirsekar/file)

After launching it with much fanfare and touting it as the next electoral game-changer, the Congress seems to have distanced itself from its ambitious Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme. There has also been a discernible dip in the UPA government’s interest in the scheme, which has manifested itself in no review meetings having taken place at the top level for several months now.

The UPA government had launched the Aadhar-based DBT scheme, which aims at eliminating middlemen and ensuring money reaches the beneficiaries directly, in 43 districts across the country on January 1 last year, further expanding the rollout to a total of 121 districts by July 1.

However, the scheme was soon plagued by a range of implementation problems and administrative glitches, grounding it even before it could take off.

Instead of flaunting it as a key policy initiative of UPA II, the Congress has kept the mention of this scheme and its slogan “aapka paisa aapke haath” to the minimum during its campaign, choosing to harp on its other welfare-based schemes instead.
The nearly-50 page Congress manifesto made just a passing mention of DBT, simply saying it is “committed to using the ‘aapka paisa aapka haath’ platform for all government programmes… DBT will ensure time-bound delivery of benefits at the individual’s doorsteps, and remove corruption and leakages.”

Significantly, the scheme does not figure in the “report card” section that lists achievements. The manifesto also does not set any specific targets or timeline for it, although it sets targets and makes definite promises for most of the other schemes and proposals. The manifesto, however, does mention Aadhar a number of times. to help us personalise your reading experience.

“The problem is that even within the party there is limited support for the scheme. It was entirely driven by a few individuals and never percolated down to the ground-level politicians.

Within the party circuit, it has not been an agenda of discussion at all, especially as a campaign issue,” said a Congress source.

According to sources, DBT barely figured in the party’s manifesto consultation process or during discussions. Former UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani, the main person behind Aadhar, held one consultation for the manifesto but on energy.

Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi, who had earlier taken keen interest in the scheme, also does not mention it during his campaign speeches, even as he emphasises other measures like MGNREGA, Right to Food and the Land Acquisition Act. Sources said there no longer seems to be anyone pushing the scheme in the party, or taking “political ownership”.

Meanwhile, at the administrative level too, interest in the scheme seems to have taken a hit. Though Planning Commission officials say they hold monthly review meetings, top committees to coordinate and monitor its implementation have not held meetings for a while.

According to government officials, the “implementation glitches” and “over-ambitious targets” made the scheme difficult to implement.

Sources in the Planning Commission said the Supreme Court’s order, restricting all authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card, also led to a slowing down by the government since it didn’t want to be seen in any sort of conflict with the court.