In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, May 15, 2014

5532 - Delayed payments, lower profits discourage IT firms from bidding for government contracts- Economic Times


By Varun Sood & Indu Nandakumar, ET Bureau | 15 May, 2014, 04.17AM IST

BANGALORE: Delayed payments and lower profit margins are discouraging Indian software providers from actively bidding for large government contracts in the domestic market, in a sign of growing disenchantment with the once favourite outsourcing projects.

Top software providers, such as Infosys, HCL TechnologiesBSE -0.18 % and MindtreeBSE -0.54 %, have in the past provided technology outsourcing services for flagship government contracts, including Aadhaar and modernising India's postal department.

But now these companies would rather bid for just private-sector deals in the country, put off by slow decision-making and policy challenges in government projects, further shrinking the size of an already small market.

Ajit Kumar, president at India's fourth-largest software outsourcer HCL Technologies, said it has become increasingly "tough to make money out of technology services in India" as a large chunk of the spending is by government. "We have learnt  lessons from government contracts," he said.

The decision to stay away from government contracts is also driven by non-payment of dues by various departments. While this could have a short-term impact on revenues from the domestic market, senior executives said it would help IT companies avoid losses and long-waits.

Government spending accounts for about one-third of the overall spending in the domestic IT market, which industry body Nasscom expects to grow 9-12% during fiscal .. during fiscal 2014-15.

Infosys, which gets 2.6% of its revenue from India, said in April it approached the government IT department through Nasscom to discuss ways to grow the domestic software market. "Most of the problems arise due to government's resistance to change," said CN Raghupati, head of InfosysBSE 0.10 % India business, adding that the Bangalore-based software provider plans to focus more on winning contracts from private sector companies in India. 

He said Infosys is being particularly "careful" while working on integrated deals where the service provider has to provide software, hardware and other services. "The new government will need time at least until next March to settle in. We don't expect any major government projects until then." 

While most Indian software providers operate at a 20% profit margin in large markets such as the United States and Europe, they say profit margins in India fall in the single digits due to late payments and delays.

"The irritating part is that government procurements are not based on quality but who can do it at the lowest cost," said Rostow Ravanan, chief financial officer at Bangalore-based Mindtree. "And then you have to spend a lot of time in getting your requests approved; all of which cause delays."

In fiscal year 2013-14, the government spent close to Rs 20,000-crore on IT, according to Nasscom.

Last year, Infosys faced over a sixmonth delay in receiving payments for its Rs 700-crore contract to modernise India's postal department, while the roll out of digitised public distribution systems in several Northern states have been delayed by over a year, experts said.

Milan Sheth, partner and technology sector lead at consulting firm Ernst & Young, said lack of profitability in government contracts is not limited to India and that working with private sector alone could impact revenues. 

Read more at: