Documents
|
No. Of Families
|
|||
Migrant
|
Non-migrant
|
|||
No. of Families
|
%
|
No. Of Families
|
%
|
|
Having Ration Card of BPL Category
|
96
|
19.2
|
92
|
18.4
|
Having General Ration Card
|
36
|
7.2
|
343
|
68.6
|
Having No ration card
|
368
|
73.6
|
65
|
13.0
|
Having Voter ID
|
342
|
68.4
|
428
|
85.6
|
Having no Voter ID
|
158
|
31.6
|
72
|
14.4
|
Having Aadhar Card
|
178
|
35.6
|
343
|
68.6
|
Having no Aadhar Card
|
322
|
64.4
|
157
|
31.4
|
Having KMC’s Health Card
|
4
|
0.8
|
32
|
6.4
|
Having No KMC’s Health Card
|
496
|
99.2
|
468
|
93.6
|
Having Job Card (100 days)
|
23
|
4.6
|
3
|
0.6
|
Having no Job Card (100 days)
|
477
|
95.4
|
497
|
99.4
|
Having Birth Certificate
|
368
|
73.6
|
372
|
74.4
|
Having No Birth Certificate
|
132
|
26.4
|
128
|
25.6
|
The Residential Address of Voter ID card as well as Aadhar Card of Migrant families is not revealed.
|
Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Friday, June 27, 2014
5616 - Could Aadhaar be the game changer for footloose labour? - India Together
5615 - Swagato Sarkar : The Unique Identity (UID) Project, Biometrics and Re-Imagining Governance in India - PDF
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cods20
The Unique Identity (UID) Project,
Biometrics and Re-Imagining
Governance in India
Swagato Sarkara
a Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, O.P. Jindal Global University, Swagato Sarkar, Sonipat Narela RoadHaryana 131001 (NCR of Delhi), India. Email:
Published online: 17 Jun 2014.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-E4CLtzu4ynWmEzNUN3RjEteWc/edit?usp=sharing
5614 - VS Seeks Probe into Transfer of Aadhar Data - New Indian Express
5613 - Feds' Data Retention Found 'Unreasonable'
5612 - House approves effort to limit NSA searches of U.S. data
5611 - On table: Aadhaar for citizens, not residents - The Telegraph India
|
|||||
to Indian citizens and not “usual residents”, the government today proposed in a departure from the UPA’s policy. |
The proposal was made at a meeting chaired by Union home minister Rajnath Singh and attended by the registrar-general of citizenship registration, C. Chandramouli.
The new policy will necessitate changes to a cabinet decision taken by the UPA, besides clearing confusion over the fate of the Aadhaar cards that are issued to residents and are not proof of citizenship.
Sources said it might take over a month for the proposal to be fleshed out and placed before the cabinet.
Over 60 crore Aadhaar numbers have been issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to “usual residents” — those who have stayed in a locality for at least six months and intend to do so for another six months.
The unique numbers will remain in place. However, if the cabinet clears the proposal, the numbered residents will be issued citizen cards only on the basis of additional death and birth registration data.
Today’s decision would limit the UIDAI’s role to generating the unique numbers and conducting a de-duplication exercise to weed out individuals getting more than one number. The UIDAI eventually may not hold camps to issue Aadhaar cards if Singh’s decision is ratified by the cabinet.
The UPA government’s plan was to derive the subset of citizens from the National Population Register (NPR) after verification of citizenship. However, the NDA government feels that there should be a single exercise leading to a national register of Indian citizens.
Singh said effective steps should be taken to create the national register of citizens, an official release said.
He instructed officials that all proposals, including update of the database through linkages with the birth and death registration system and the issuance of national identity cards to citizens, be brought for approval at the earliest, sources said.
Over the next month, the Registrar-General of India is expected to prepare a roadmap to issue citizenship cards. “The Centre feels unique numbers and cards should be issued only to citizens and there is no need for two types of cards,” a source said.
Since 2010, numbers and cards were issued after collection of biometric data (iris scan and fingerprinting) by two authorities: the RGI’s office under the National Population Register scheme and the Nandan Nilekani-led UIDAI. Nilekani, who was the face of the UPA’s Aadhaar programme, resigned as UIDAI chairman on March 13 before contesting on a Congress ticket from Bangalore. He lost the election.
The Aadhaar numbers were aimed at improving the use and implementation of benefits and services provided under government schemes, planning and security.
There was some confusion when the UPA decided to allow two agencies to collect data of residents. The UIDAI collected biometric data and issued Aadhaar cards while the NPR also gathered the data. P. Chidambaram and Nilekani had run-ins over which agency would enrol residents.
Plans of the previous government to legislate the UIDAI virtually stand scrapped after today’s meeting.
Getting an Aadhaar card from the UIDAI was optional but enrolment under the National Population Register scheme is mandatory under Citizenship Rules. Often, residents were confused whether they needed to go to an “NPR camp” if they had been to an “Aadhaar camp”. They will have to, according to rules.
The resident is required to visit a National Population Register camp with the unique Aadhaar number, provide additional personal information and undergo verification for registration in the population.
“The enrolment will now be done completely under the National Register of Indian Citizens by the RGI’s office,” said a source.
5610 - Security risk? Maintenance of Aadhaar data in the hands of a private company in Kerala - Medianama
Thursday, June 26, 2014
5609 - Why need Aadhaar when NPR is here?
5608 - Rahul Jacob: The Aadhaar tragedy - Business Standard
This Indian Express report came just a few days after news last week that Aadhaar is likely to be transferred to the home ministry to ensure that those with Aadhaar cards are bona fide citizens. This is a backward step, a reversion to the mindless turf battles of the Congress-led government where P Chidambaram's home ministry questioned the need for Aadhaar using similarly warped logic. Aadhaar was always about transferring benefits to those below the poverty line in an efficient and transparent way. It could have worked like the United States' social security number. The pilot programme involving transferring cash to the accounts of Aadhaar users to compensate them for buying gas cylinders at open-market prices worked well, despite some teething problems and having been rushed through. That is about the only litmus test that ought to matter.
As with any project that is revolutionary, Aadhaar would have hit roadblocks. Yes, there would have been implementation problems in its completely online system, because internet connectivity in many parts of rural India is a problem. And not just in our villages: on Tuesday, a demo by Google of the new range of voice commands for smartphone users foundered because the internet connection went down - in the ballroom of The Oberoi in New Delhi. There was, in any case, an ecosystem of entrepreneurs, inspired by the Aadhaar rollout seeking to provide, say, Bluetooth access to people in villages powered by solar energy to get around the connectivity problem and help people open bank accounts. Of course, in this country with more than its fair share of people scamming the system, the definition of who was poor would have been abused. Nor should anyone be excluded from legitimately receiving benefits just because they did not have an Aadhaar number. These are all reasonable objections and in the full glare of public scrutiny, Aadhaar would have had to deal with them.
But the home ministry makes none of these objections. It proposes to put the names of those with Aadhaar numbers on neighbourhood noticeboards and then invite comments on whether they are citizens or not. This Kafkaesque approach, called "social vetting", sounds just a little impractical. (Memo to my neighbours: you may not know me because, like most people, I am in the office much of the day, but please vouch for the fact that I do strange aerobic exercises in the park in the morning.)
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would seem just the sort of party that would embrace Aadhaar. Every other page of its manifesto makes some reference to changing governance in this country. "Our government will be a government of the poor, marginalised and left behind", it says, in a prelude to its promise of delivering poverty alleviation programmes through "convergence, transparency and efficiency". On another page, it promotes e-governance for being "easy, efficient and effective". Among the most energetic states in Aadhaar enrollment and experimentation in the past few years have been the BJP-ruled ones such as Gujarat and Jharkhand (which was later under President's rule).
Given all this, why is there no discernible difference in the positions of the BJP-led government towards Aadhaar and the dysfunctional approach of Mr Chidambaram under the United Progressive Alliance? The common thread is that, as Sir Humphrey Appleby often reminded us in the TV series Yes Minister, governance often has little to do with the people. Then there is a problem peculiar to Lutyens' Delhi: most of the people who offer loud opinions have staff to do their shopping and have never been anywhere near a supermarket or kirana store, let alone a ration shop. Those of a more conspiratorial bent believe there is an industry of smartcard providers eager to benefit from the vacuum created by disabling Aadhaar. The BJP manifesto also offers clues in a section labelled "External Security - Its Boundary, Beauty and Bounty". It promises "punitive measures to check illegal immigration". This is laudable, but is it not then inconsistent to also be allowing unilateral entry to Bangladeshi trucks as the commerce department is planning to do, even if that furthers the cause of our $5 billion in cross-border trade?
What Aadhaar sought to do was create a system where the, term, "bounty" of subsidies was redirected from unscrupulous middlemen to the rightful beneficiaries. Instead, in the real and imaginary battle against Bangladeshi immigrants, we are now apparently prepared to throw out a biometric system that has enrolled about 639 million citizens at laser speed so that we can continue to dehumanise hundreds of millions of India's poorest citizens by making them queue and beg and petition for the paltry benefits the state sends their way.
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
5607 - One week deadline set for job card-Aadhaar linkage - The Hindu
5606 - Over 4 lakh still waiting for Aadhaar - TNN
5605 - NDA govt planning to merge UIDAI with NPR - India Today
With the Home Minister giving his consent, activists resisting the move have written to Singh, reminding him that PM Modi had earlier opposed the move in a letter written to former PM Manmohan Singh on October 6, 2011. Activists are arguing that an identity card like this violates constitutional rights and that many countries have abandoned such projects.
5604 - NDA set to eclipse UPA's Aadhaar programme - NDTv
5603 - HomeMin likely to take over Aadhaar biometric data - Business Stadard
5602 - Identity crisis: End of road for Aadhaar - Deccan Chronicle
5601 - Editorial: Aadhaar is not equal to citizen card The Financial Express
5600 - Five Reasons Why Aadhaar Must Live On - Computer Financial Express
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
5599 - NDA’s inhabitant ID cards might kill UPA’s Aadhaar proj - Indian Radios
5598 - NDA's national ID cards may kill UPA's Aadhaar - Samachar.com
|
||||||
|