In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, July 3, 2014

5633 - Aadhaar versus NPR debate: An alternate view - Niti Central


Subbaraman Iyer

2 Jul 2014

A file photo of Aadhaar cards. (Photo by PTI)

The Union Home Ministry’s mandate to the Registrar General Of India (RGI) to prepare the National Population Register (NPR) and use that as the basis for the disbursal of the Government payments spells the death knell of the Aadhaar platform. The turf battle between the Home Ministry and the UIDAI which the former won means that the 63 crore cards issued at a cost of about Rs 4000 crores along with the complementary infrastructure, network linkages and support services would be slowly rendered useless.

Despite the reservations expressed by Standing Committee on Finance chaired by Yashwant Sinha of the BJP in 2011, governance-driven Chief Ministers in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh (BJP-ruled States) have embraced Aadhaar. Narendra Modi as Chief Minister gave Aadhaar, a mission mode status when it was launched and had 70 per cent of the population covered. Madhya Pradesh ranks third in issuing Aadhaar cards among all Indian States. Most of the States have enrolled over 50 per cent of their residents. Aadhaar is a 12-digit number provided against one’s biometric data issued after a process of reduplication ensuring the uniqueness. It has to be emphasised that Aadhaar doesn’t confer any entitlement or eligibility of benefits. Any Government body is free to define their own criteria for eligibility and then map the individual’s Aadhaar number. It thus establishes a database of eligible Aadhaars for a specific purpose with relative ease and consistency.

It is applicable to even determine citizenship and its attendant benefits. Hence the criticism that the minuscule number of non-citizens would appropriate Government benefits is clearly flawed as the necessary controls can be built to target beneficiaries. 

The fact that Aadhaar has the potential to save Rs 60,000 crores in subsidy management (assuming it can save a modest 15 per cent of the national subsidy outlay of Rs 4 lakh crores) cannot be ignored. 

An expert committee headed by Prof SG Dhande (former Director of IIT Kanpur) reported that DBTL (Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG) pilot in 291 districts was successful in achieving its objectives, viz reducing diversion, eliminating ghost/duplicate connections, and improving LPG availability. It recommended the DBTL to be reinstated. The savings that can be obtained in PDS (where about 10 per cent of the ration cards are duplicates) would easily exceed Rs 4000 crores!

The privacy and security concerns of Aadhaar (reasons that have been cited to jettison Aadhaar) may be legitimate but are exaggerated. Aadhaar just collects basic demographic data with biometrics and doesn’t send any personal information when used for authentication purposes. Google and Facebook are the universal gateways to online services for most users worldwide, yet no one complains because of the ease they offer. To merely see Aadhaar as an identity platform would be myopic. Aadhaar based applications can deliver cost benefits and improve service delivery. The necessary programming interfaces have already been built for several applications.

Aadhaar can easily serve as the access mechanism to an unified payment infrastructure that could centralise all financial transactions, including wages, salaries and subsidies – under a single number to an Aadhaar enabled bank account of the recipient. Agencies would be free to set their own business rules, integrate those with their business processes and automate the cash transfer process, all of it in real time. Aadhaar can be the critical enabler to integrate and consolidate subsidies and entitlements under one umbrella, ensuring better governance. Aadhaar then evolves to become the digital infrastructure to create a governance eco-system.

The NPR has been slow right from the start. Till date it has only produced only 24 crore cards with biometric data. The NPR authorities are now planning to carry a nationwide door-to-door verification exercise to establish the credentials for every citizen by validating over 15 demographic variables and five biometric fields. This is going to take many years and several additional thousands of crores. It will have to develop the programming interfaces to streamline payments, and direct benefit transfers— critical areas for managing subsidies. With NPR replacing Aadhaar, the benefits to be gained in targeting subsidies and improving governance will be delayed. 

The poor will suffer the most as they have to resort to bribes to get access cards and avail Government benefits. Sadly, bureaucratic turf battles and political motives have trounced developmental aspirations.

The efficacy of the Government should be in building applications and using analytics to improve governance using existing digital infrastructure; not creating new access mechanisms with marginal benefits. A lot of tax payers money has already gone into building Aadhaar.

Implicit in the “Minimum Government, Maximum governance” promise is the aspect of speed of delivering it. By trying to reinvent the access card and using only Government agencies, this decision of the Union Home Ministry is clearly inconsistent with the promise.

(Professor Subbaraman Iyer has been in the technology deployment for close to 3 decades. He currently teaches Emerging Technologies at leading MBA schools in India and abroad.)

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this article are the author's personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Niti Central and Niti Central is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.