In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, July 6, 2014

5637 - High time govt agencies get smart with cards - TNN Goa

John Eric Gomes | Jul 3, 2014, 12.43AM IST

The Goa government has been making the citizens life miserable by foisting all sorts of smart cards and schemes, some running concurrently. For example whilst enrollments was on for National Population Register (NPR) and Aadhaar cards, the government agencies got us to go in for smart card for Swarnajayanti Aarogya Bima Yojana (a medical insurance scheme for Goans). When I went to the power substation counter at Porvorim to record my particulars, there were non-Goan labourers getting themselves enrolled.

After I got my card and learnt that about the hospital empanelled for my area, I went there to check my entitlement. The receptionist had no clue. After waiting for about half an hour, she found out that it only entitles me for surgery up to a particular amount and that I would have to pay for outpatient and consultations.

The government has now been scrapped this badly planned scheme and promised a new one.

Study From Home At Your Own Pace Download A Course Guide Today.
Discover the 3 reasons Australia is about to end its 22 year run
Let us examine the Aadhar and NPR schemes and smart cards. The NPR exercise commenced a few years ago. We had to go to the centre, for us luckily it was our Sainik Gymkhana hall where we could organize seating. After a long wait for my turn to come, the fingerprints, eye scan and particulars were recorder by an operator. The NPR involved officials coming to my residence for recording and confirming details.

All said and done, after about 6 months I got the smart card. Against my date of birth, place of birth was recorded as North Goa which was wrong. The card had a chip with details recorded, so I thought I would check whether these details were correctly entered in the chip. I went to the relevant government office and was told that the cards were made in Bangalore. The official said that all North Goa residents had this entry against date of birth.

The official also informed that there is no equipment available with them to read the information from the chip.

Coming to the Aadhaar card; the same contracted private organization was simultaneously recording for NPR late entries/those not recorded. Besides getting my enrollment done in Porvorim, I accompanied many people to get their information recorded in Panaji and Socorro. But there was absolutely no checking done.

Whatever details one filled in the given form or provided via an affidavit, in case the required proof wasn't available. Therefore many people exploited this loophole and even got Aadhaar cards without any verification. The positive aspect is that it helped the migrant labour and those who do not own a house or have a permanent residence to get ration cards, LPG connection, bank accounts and avail of government schemes. The same lacuna applies to the many smart cards issued which are not a smart thing to do if it leads to fraud and the government cannot monitor or check it!

Another example is the driving licence smart card. It is meant for checking a driver's details; however the traffic police do not have the relevant equipment read the card to verify the driver's history.

All in all, I feel there is too much duplication of effort, colossal wastage of funds and effort as it done without proper planning.

Prior to introducing any scheme, the authorities must hold wide ranging discussions with all stakeholders and formulate a proper system.

Any exercise involving the citizens and private agencies must take into account reliability and security, not to mention harassment of the busy citizen already burdened with making a living in very difficult circumstances, not to mention the price rise and non-availability of affordable essential commodities.

To require whole families to stand in line and keep repeating the same exercise is the height of government inefficiency. The Aadhaar scheme is surely a mess, unreliable and a security risk. There is no reason why it could not have been done simultaneously with the NPR at half the cost, double the reliability and convenience of the citizen. Being computerized, cross checking should have been comparatively easier. It must also take into account that fingerprints of many older people or labourers cannot be properly recorded by the equipment and reportedly retina verification may change with age.

All this boils down to lack of transparency and accountability of government agencies. Somehow it is always convenience of the government employees and their own welfare which takes priority with no accountability! There is urgent need for administrative reforms with pin pointing responsibility and deterrent consequences for dereliction of duty and loss to the exchequer.


The writer is a retired naval officer residing in Porvorim