In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, July 3, 2014

5634 - Budget 2014: How Modi, Jaitley can 're-energise' India - First Post


Budget 2014: How Modi, Jaitley can 're-energise' India 
by Raghav Bahl  Jul 1, 2014 15:48 IST

Two days ago, I wrote how the finance minister could use Aadhaar to consolidate his fiscal arithmetic. Today, I shall prove how he can “re-energise” the country by another gentle and calibrated – and not “violent” as it is often mistakenly perceived to be - reform.

The opportune moment to free up fuel prices is now – but “now” does not mean “this instant”; it means in politically palatable instalments over a short period of time. While governments usually postpone tough calls, hoping for better times, experience shows that it is wise to face disappointments squarely Mercifully, there is no subsidy on petrol at the moment – and the relative ease with which this major reform has been absorbed should encourage us to follow through with more. On diesel, the ‘under-recovery’ is Rs 3.40 a litre - although, if the more rational export parity price is used to calculate this under recovery, it is only one rupee! India is a substantial exporter of diesel. It has been so since 2000. In the last financial year, India exported diesel worth $25.4 billion or eight percent of total exports. So it is perfectly sensible to switch to export parity price – in which case, the finance minister could move to market pricing of diesel in two quick hops of 50 paise each, about a fortnight apart.

Ideally, there should not be a big difference between the prices of diesel and petrol. People must choose fuel for economic considerations. If the gap is narrow, those who are highly mobile will likely opt for cars running on diesel, which gives more mileage. If the gap is wide, car companies will pocket the gains by making diesel cars costlier. By continuing the diesel subsidy, we are abetting a perverse situation, where diesel car manufacturers are profiting at the expense of common people.

Now to kerosene, the much misunderstood “poor man’s fuel”. Here, the ‘under-recovery’ in Delhi on a selling price of Rs 14.96 a litre was nearly Rs 33 in June. According to Mukesh Anand of the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, the share of kerosene in petro-product consumption has declined from 13 percent to nine percent, despite being subsidised. It is sold through ration shops at discounted rates, so the poor can afford it for lighting – which it does not do nicely, giving off a lot of soot, which pollutes indoor air, and harms health. As both kerosene and diesel are middle distillates, they mix easily. The price difference makes it an ideal choice for adulteration. 

Bhamy V Shenoy of NCAER, a Delhi-based research outfit, had estimated in 2005 that 38 percent of kerosene was used for adulteration. If this estimate holds, there is little justification for such a huge payout.

I would urge the finance minister to announce in the budget a “pilot kerosene subsidy rationalisation plan”, whereby kerosene prices are increased by 10 paise every week. If this were to create a severe disruption (highly unlikely), the pilot could be withdrawn – on the other hand, if it were successful, we would have shaved off nearly a sixth of the subsidy in one year, giving us the confidence to persist until it is rationalised completely, perhaps over 4 years or so.

The government claims that all but 22,000 villages out of 5,96,000 were un-electrified as of end of May. If electrification means not just wires passing overhead but homes being able to access electricity, the government must vow to provide all of them with round the clock power by 2016, like Gujarat. For the very poor, it can give subsidised connections. Since electricity is a state subject, the government should declare that all BJP-ruled states will achieve this goal in the next two years, so that other states are pressured to follow. That will allow the subsidy on kerosene to be scrapped.

Now to the urban scourge of subsidy on cooking gas–the best way to tackle this is for homes in cities to be connected to the gas grid. The monopoly of suppliers like Indrapastha Gas in Delhi should end. We need more competition. The cylinders released should be diverted to towns and villages. Every household should be entitled to say six or nine subsidised cylinders a year. The subsidy in June was Rs 22.58 a cylinder. The ‘under-recovery’ per cylinder was Rs 432.71. Being an urban phenomenon, this subsidy is best given though cash transfers. As identifying the poor is difficult, we could start by dis-entitling the relatively well-off like those owning apartments, paying income tax or owning cars.

Finally, we need to get a fix on coal supplies. The monopoly of Coal India must end. Let it remain a state-owned entity. Prime Minister Narendra Modi believes in running public sector undertakings professionally. CIL will be a test of his resolve. He must allow competition in coal mining and cut the environmental red tape. The threat of ecological damage, according to experts like Prof Kirit Parikh, is exaggerated. Coal mining, according, to him will affect at most about one percent of India’s forested area. Many of the forests atop coal bearing zones are said to be only on paper. Very few are dense, virgin and bio-diverse forests (since this is a fact that can be easily checked, all conjecture and speculative propaganda around it should be squelched). Forests that are cut in the other mining areas can be replanted as the open mines, once exhausted, are covered up. Funds collected for compensatory afforestation can be used. We should invite international mine developers so they not only bring in technology but also best practices. The tribals who are displaced must be given a share in the profits via a simply royalty on revenues, rather than conjure up a convoluted and fudge-able formula.

Finally, the country needs to be convinced about the tangible benefits of rationalizing energy subsidies. While prices will tick up in some items, there will be a massive lessening of fiscal pressures, lowering the cripplingly high level of generalized inflation. Very soon, the benefits shall be apparent to everybody.

Until then, Prime Minister Modi must use his legendary communication skills to keep his people tethered to hope and optimism.