In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

5682 - Smart cities or wiretap ones? - BUsiness Standard


Government may have to address privacy concerns arising out of project

Surabhi Agarwal & Aditi Divekar  |  New Delhi  July 12, 2014 Last Updated at 22:37 IST

The government allocated upwards of Rs 7,000 crore for building 100 smart cities in the country in the Union Budget, leading to huge opportunities for corporate houses, especially technology-centric ones. 

According to experts, once the jubilation around the business prospects settles down, the government may have to address privacy issues that a project of this nature may throw up. India still does not have a privacy law that spells out no-go areas for the government in this kind of surveillance.

"We have a euphoric attitude towards technology and what it can do, but this is a good time to raise these issues," said Parminder Jeet Singh, executive director of IT for Change, a think tank dealing with technology issues.

A smart city's roads, traffic, electricity, water and sewage  are connected through a technology platform and controlled at an integrated centre. This helps not only in better urban planning but also improves use of resources. However, considering these cities will have to be ring-fenced through closed circuit cameras and lots of equipment in homes and offices will contain electronic chips to transmit information, there could be privacy concerns. The government may end up collecting too much data about citizens that could be misused if not protected.

R Chandrashekhar, president of technology industry body Nasscom, said, "We have the right to information but the other side of the coin the right to privacy is not there." The former telecom and IT secretary has been part of discussions on a privacy bill, first mooted in 2010 and re-drafted several times, whose future is not clear under the new government.

Last year, camera footage of a couple travelling in the Delhi Metro was leaked on the Internet creating a huge public outcry. Issues such as how much can the government record; who can access that data; for how long can it be stored; and what are the penalties for misuse need to be defined clearly. Even though India has an Information Technology Act that deals with some of these issues, Chandrasekhar said a comprehensive law was  needed that would be binding on public authorities and individuals.

Singh added that we should have clear policies around privacy before the government decided to go in for such massive surveillance. "Considering these cities will involve the Internet of Things, there will be personal information on a grid that needs to be dealt with carefully," he pointed out.

However, technology companies, which see an investment opportunity around smart cities, differ.  Anand Navani, country manager of video intelligence solutions at Verint System, said keeping public places under surveillance was in the interest of citizens and could not be considered as an intrusion on privacy. The company participated in the Surat Safe City Project. "When implementing the project in Surat, we  along with the authorities had identified public spots in the city that need to be under check. These places were not schools or college campuses or even manufacturing or industrial areas that could be considered evading privacy," said Navani.

Safe cities uses all key resources the government agencies had to make them livable, added Andrew Chi, head of public safety solutions at NEC India.

Cyber law consultant N A Vijayashankar said even though an individual had no claim on privacy in a public place, there must be a way for citizens to uphold their rights in case of a breach. "The IT Act does provide safeguards, but it does not spell out for how much time the information collected by the government can be stored and what are the security measures that need to be put in place to ensure against misuse." The leaked tapes of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia were an example of such a breach, he added.

INDIA'S TECHNOPOLIS
| The government has allocated Rs 7,000 crore for building 100 smart cities
| This is a huge opportunity for corporates especially technology firms
| Citizens' privacy could be an issue as India still doesn't have a privacy bill
| A smart city will be an integrating infrastructure and services through a technology platform and controlled through an integrated command centre