In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, November 9, 2014

5953 - Creating unique digital identities - South Asia Institute.Harvard.Edu



Nilekani delivers the Mahindra Lecture

By Siddarth Nagaraj, MALD Candidate, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy,Tufts University

“Being able to confirm, in a robust and unequivocal way, who a person is” is vital to governance and social inclusion, and requires the creation of unique digital identity, said Nandan Nilekani, former Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) at the South Asia Institute Annual Harish C. Mahindra Lecture on November 3, 2014.

During his tenure as chairman of UIDAI, Nilekani designed and implemented Aadhaar, a national biometric identification project wherein each Indian is issued a twelve-digit number that is unique to them.

In his lecture on Nov. 3, Nilekani discussed the personal and national benefits of Aadhaar, which he referred to as the “world’s largest social project.” His arguments in favor of the initiative gave the audience fascinating insight into the creation and structure of the world’s largest national identification system.

Nilekani was introduced by Tarun Khanna, Jorge Paulo Lemann Professor at Harvard Business School and Director of SAI. Prior to becoming chairman of UIDAI, Nilekani co-founded and later served as CEO of Infosys, India’s third largest IT services company. In 2009, at the invitation of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, he left the private sector to lead UIDAI, where he created Aadhaar.

During the enrollment process, Aadhaar collects the name, address, gender, fingerprint and iris scan of each enrolled individual. Under Nilekani’s leadership, Aadhaar enrolled 700 million Indians in five years and he has continued to advocate on its behalf, arguing that digital identity is essential not only for oversight and accountability, but also for social inclusion and personal empowerment.



When explaining Aadhaar’s importance, Nilekani emphasized both the need for digital identity in the modern era and the multiple applications of the project’s ID. The government’s interest in Aadhaar originated from a desire to identify fraud that is perpetrated easily in the absence of clear, unique identity status.

Nilekani noted that Aadhaar has been successful in this area, but also strongly stressed the project’s potential to expand social inclusion. In Nilekani’s view, providing individuals with Aadhaar gives them an exclusive proof of their identity that is unique to them and cannot be misappropriated. This makes it easier to collect benefits, preserve public and medical records, and protects a basic right to sole possession of one’s own identity.

Nilekani posited that Aadhaar has created a foundation from which Indians who previously held no exclusive identification can engage in more legitimate “small-level interactions” such as opening and using bank accounts that collectively contribute to productivity. By doing so, they embed themselves in society and the economy more securely.

During the lecture, Nilekani also identified several critical challenges that he and his team faced when designing Aadhaar. Although the initiative had government support, its long-term viability depended on immediate, irreversible implementation. Accordingly, the UIDAI set an enrollment target of 600 million people (which they surpassed significantly) and issued IDs at a pace that was rapid enough to give an increasing number of Indians access to Aadhaar’s benefits while moving the project to a point where it would be too large and heavily embedded for its critics to easily eliminate it.

It was also essential that Nilekani and his team maintain direct control over Aadhaar, which served a unique purpose, but would have been severely undermined if forced to coordinate with other ministries’ priorities. Instead, the Prime Minister granted Nilekani autonomy in leading the UIDAI, giving him freedom to shape Aadhaar as best suited to the project’s purpose.

Nilekani, left, with Tarun Khanna

Perhaps the most significant challenges facing Aadhaar’s creators were linked to issues of scalability. Nilekani observed that many critics have focused great attention upon Aadhaar’s unparalleled target population size (now extended to all Indians), but he explained that UIDAI’s commitment to designing scale properly early on resulted in successful enrollment of smaller but nonetheless daunting and then-unprecedented numbers of people, something that skeptics had considered unfeasible.

Nilekani noted that some opponents of Aadhaar regard plans to enroll every Indian as being excessive, but countered that not only should enrollment be fully inclusive, but that the character and amount of data collected by Aadhaar is deliberately limited. This was due to a deliberate choice to place specific constraints on types of relevant data collected so that scalability would be optimized.

Aadhaar was carefully designed to serve a very specific purpose, and in order to achieve that on such a massive scale, the UIDAI team utilized an intriguingly minimalist approach that focused data collection upon what is purely essential (name, gender, address) and unique (iris scan, fingerprint).

Mahindra Lecture with Nandan Nilekani

Following the lecture, Nilekani took time to answer questions from the audience, commenting that numerous policymakers from several states have consulted with UIDAI with regard to adopting the Aadhaar model elsewhere. Stressing Aadhaar’s minimalist character, he encouraged social entrepreneurs to seek simple solutions when addressing scalability.

Concluding the event, Nilekani directly addressed those who remained wary of the scale of Aadhaar’s work, reminding the audience of the much greater extent to which Internet companies collect personal data for their own ends: “Fear Amazon, not Aadhaar.”

Reactions from Twitter:

Good to hear @NandanNilekani be nuanced re. e-voting: ok for eligibility, not voting: concerns re. #anonymity being compromised #SAIMahindra
— Malavika Jayaram (@MalJayaram) November 4, 2014

“You can’t solve the citizenship problem without the solving the identification problem.” @NandanNilekani @HarvardSAI
— Divya (@dso713) November 3, 2014

.@NandanNilekani Very minimal set of fields collected. Also remember, people *want* to be included and seen. #SAIMahindra
— Malavika Jayaram (@MalJayaram) November 4, 2014

“children’s height and weight captured in real time” — @NandanNilekani possibility for biometric ID uses in healthcare #saimahindra
— Laura Neuhaus (@promethea) November 3, 2014

— Kunal Lunawat (@KunalLunawat) November 3, 2014

@NandanNilekani @HarvardSAI Aadhaar was designed to be too big to be reversed!
— Nikhil Jaipuria (@nikhiljaipuria) November 3, 2014

Attending the Annual Mahindra Lecture at Harvard University about the Digital Ecosystem in India. pic.twitter.com/nzIu1tf1WM
— Arvind Gupta (@buzzindelhi) November 3, 2014

Delighted that my friend Nandan is delivering the Harish Mahindra lecture at Harvard this evening… http://t.co/LaqgzGQHUh
— anand mahindra (@anandmahindra) November 3, 2014

— Kunal Lunawat (@KunalLunawat) November 3, 2014