In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, November 27, 2014

6077 - Time to think of Aadhaar’s alternatives by Dr Anupam Saraph - Sunday Guardian


OPINION
ANUPAM SARAPH








Dr Anupam Saraph is a professor, Future Designer, former governance and IT adviser to Goa CM Manohar Parrikar and World Economic Forum.


In place of Aadhaar, the government should enable a Shared ID at oneid.gov.in.



The Aadhaar does not serve any purpose of governance. It does not protect public interest. Since it has failed to convince anyone of its benefits, except the private interests served by its implementation, it's time to look for alternatives to Aadhaar.

In place of Aadhaar, the government may enable a Shared ID at oneid.gov.in. The idea of "Shared ID", as designed in Pune, is to allow citizens to create, own and share their own id. They have complete control on who can see or use the id.

If the Shared ID is shared with a government agency, it will allow the owner of the id to verify and associate their government records like birth, marriage, etc. These records will then remain associated with the Shared ID. Any requests to link the same government record to multiple owners will trigger an alert or even an audit of the owner's id. This is exactly the opposite of what the Aadhaar does. Unlike the Aadhaar, which makes every id have Aadhaar as a primary key, the Shared ID associates other ids as verification and does not expose them to any modification.

The citizens who submit their Shared ID to any government agency can access information on incentives, schemes, and programmes they automatically qualified for, or availed, based on their profile. They can also access information on demography, energy use, water use, land use, mobility and other details in their neighbourhood after logging in to their account on oneid.gov.in. Importantly, the Shared ID is not necessary for delivering any entitlement, but rather allows those who create a Shared ID to keep a track of all the entitlements they receive. This id serves the purpose of allowing the citizen to manage their id and contact sharing, and keep a passbook of services, rights, benefits or entitlements qualified for or availed during their lifetime. For those digitally excluded, the local post office may create and manage Shared ID accounts that would be subject to audit.

Although the government has information on every citizen, it does not have a mechanism to identify beneficiaries proactively without requiring those who wish to benefit from a scheme to fill various forms and submit many documents providing information that the government itself issued or already has. 

This is both a waste of resources as also a way to exclude those who may really qualify.

The government can overcome this by internally connecting the birth, marriage, address registrations and death records without requiring any form, id numbers or id from citizens to create a National Population Register (NPR). This would then be used to identify the benefits each citizen is entitled to. This would also ensure that no citizen would need to submit to government any document issued by the government itself. While automatic entitlements and benefits could be provided to beneficiaries identified by the NPR, manual benefits should continue to those not automatically included in NPR.

For those who have a Shared ID, their entitlements would be visible on their Shared ID account. In order to ensure full inclusion, all those eligible for various benefits would be listed on beneficiaries.gov.in for public audit. Such a system serves the purpose of enabling inclusion of all citizens and not that of exclusion from services, as does the Aadhaar.

To ensure that no one is denied any service, right, benefit or entitlement for want of an id, the government may require that each agency delivering any entitlement or right will register anyone not already in their registry, who benefits from their service, right, benefit or entitlement. Such a record would be maintained to eliminate the need to re-register the beneficiary for future transactions and ensure the delivery of rights without any hassles, while at the same time permitting any audit of the delivery of entitlements and rights. In order to ensure full inclusion, all those having taken benefits would be listed at beneficiaries.gov.in for public audit. Those who have some records with the government would already be on the beneficiaries.gov.in list. For those who are not on the list this would ensure inclusion to receive benefits. On receiving benefits they too would be listed on beneficiaries.gov.in for a public audit. Such a system, then, serves the purpose of enabling audit for the government and not that of blocking services, as the Aadhaar does.

The unbanked may access cash entitlements, loans and grants at the nearest post office branch across the country. The post office would create a Shared ID of the beneficiary to enable audit of the entitlements delivered and to ensure the next time round the person does not have to recreate the id.

Any change of address would be updated by the new post office. The post-office savings account will encourage the unbanked to save through the Shared ID. It will also enable a way to deliver insurance to the beneficiaries.

These alternatives to the Aadhaar will fit Prime Minister Narendra Modi's minimum government vision and ensure good governance.