In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

6023 - Push for Aadhaar-linked job scheme wages - Telegraph India


BASANT KUMAR MOHANTY

New Delhi, Nov. 15: The Centre plans to pay rural job scheme wages directly into the workers’ bank or post office accounts after linking these to their Aadhaar numbers to check fraud.

The “direct benefit transfer” could be implemented from January across half the country — in those 300 of India’s 625 districts where 70 per cent of residents have Aadhaar or National Population Registrar (NPR) numbers.

Eastern states like Bengal and Odisha are poorly represented in the list. Only four Bengal districts — Hooghly, Murshidabad, Malda and Howrah — have made the cut. None have from Assam and Bihar.

Some 37 districts from Madhya Pradesh, 27 from Tamil Nadu, 24 from Jharkhand and 20 from Haryana are on the list.

A worker’s bank or postal account will be “seeded” with his or her Aadhaar or NPR number. This means the account details will be linked electronically to the holder’s Aadhaar or NPR number and biometric details such as fingerprints and iris impression.

The worker can go to the bank and withdraw the money, or the bank’s business correspondents can deliver the wage at the worker’s doorstep after verifying his or her identity with the help of portable equipment called micro-ATMs.

Rural development secretary L.C. Goyal told The Telegraph that Aadhaar-seeding will not be mandatory for the direct benefit transfer —wages will also be credited to accounts that are not Aadhaar-seeded.

“Aadhaar-seeding is not mandatory but is desirable — it will check fraud in payment,” Goyal said.

About 80 per cent of the job scheme’s workers now receive their wages in their accounts while the rest are paid in cash, mostly in remote and hilly areas. But the system is blighted by large-scale corruption and delayed wage payments.

Since biometric verification of identity is seen as more reliable than signatures or thumb impressions in rural India, an Aadhaar-based payment system is expected to check fraud and delays.

Besides, the workers can then receive their wages at home through the business correspondents of banks.

There are sceptics, however. “The government had experimented with direct transfer of the fuel subsidy in Ajmer district, Rajasthan, on a pilot basis. It failed,” said social activist Nikhil Dey.

In Ajmer, the business correspondent system remained the weak link.

Besides, “the way the government is pushing direct transfer”, Dey said, “it seems that Aadhaar-seeding will, in effect, be mandatory”.

“They can’t make it mandatory. The Supreme Court has said that Aadhaar is voluntary,” he said.

Verification of identity though biometric data is not foolproof, Dey argued: the fingerprints of many older people are not very clear and they may face problems.

The state governments have been asked to start a campaign so that workers with Aadhaar or NPR numbers can request their bank or the post office to go for seeding before the end of the year. Also, workers who lack a bank or postal account can get one.

“I doubt if all the accounts can be seeded with Aadhaar or NPR details by December,” Goyal said. If too many workers’ accounts remain un-seeded, he said, the launch could be delayed “by a few months”.

Only 36 per cent of the accounts of the 5.5 crore rural job scheme workers in the 300 chosen districts are seeded with Aadhaar or NPR details.

The Odisha districts that have made the cut are Balangir, Nayagarh, Puri, Nuapada, Gajapati, Dhenkanal, Cuttack and Khorda.

A Comptroller and Auditor General report, tabled in Parliament in April last year, had highlighted the various kinds of irregularities that infected the rural job scheme.

The scheme seeks to provide up to 100 days’ unskilled but paid labour to every rural household in a year.