In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, November 22, 2014

6043 - Banks seek fee for cooking gas subsidy - Business Standard


Sudheer Pal Singh  &  Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  November 20, 2014 Last Updated at 00:47 IST

State-owned banks are seeking a fee for crediting the cooking gas subsidy in the accounts of beneficiaries as the government gears up for a nationwide launch of cash transfers.

The banks argue since the scale of credits is unforeseen, they will have to bear an unknown cost of servicing these accounts. Some banks are seeking a two per cent commission on credit for the Rs 568 subsidy a cylinder.

The finance ministry, however, says once the cooking gas subsidy starts flowing into accounts, banks will have enough floating capital to meet their costs.

"Discussions are on between the department of expenditure and the department of financial services," said a senior official with knowledge of the talks between the two sections in the finance ministry.

SUBSIDY STATUS
  • Banks argue since the scale of credits is unforeseen, they will have to bear an unknown cost of servicing these accounts
  • Some are seeking two per cent commission on credit for Rs 568 subsidy a cylinder
  • However, finance ministry says once the cooking gas subsidy starts flowing into accounts, banks will have enough floating capital to meet their costs
  • Discussions are on between the department of expenditure and the department of financial services

"The department of financial services says banks are incurring a cost, while the department of expenditure is refuting the argument. The advance credit into the accounts is huge and should be enough to cover costs," he added.

The government launched a modified cash transfer scheme for 23.3 million households in 54 districts of 11 states on November 15 to curb diversion of subsidised cooking gas. Bank accounts linked to Aadhaar, a biometric identification system, received over Rs 10 crore in 700,000 transactions in the first four days.

A senior finance ministry official said the expenditure department would not allocate extra money in the current financial year unless the government raised supplementary demands for grants in the winter session of Parliament. The official said government departments had been told to save money from original Budget allocations in order to meet the fiscal deficit target.

A committee headed by Nandan Nilekani, former head of the Aadhaar programme, had recommended a fee of 3.14 per cent to banking correspondents for each cash transfer. The finance ministry had, after much dialogue, agreed to pay a commission to bank agents providing last-mile connectivity in remote areas, although the fee was lower than Nilekani's recommendation.

Public sector banks, especially the large ones, want a two per cent commission on each credit. They argue transactions by banking correspondents are difficult to track and the commission should be paid to them.

"The government expects to save Rs 20,000 crore of the gas subsidy through this project. Can it not give Rs 1,000 crore to banks?" asked an executive with a large public sector bank. He pointed out banks were spending money on opening new accounts and servicing existing ones.

Another government official said: "The committee made its recommendations based on transactions, but if a commission is paid on each credit, there will be little incentive for banks to make sure beneficiaries have access to banking."

The issue is gridlocked, the last discussions took place a week ago.

An earlier cash transfer scheme by the United Progressive Alliance government had to be stopped after the Supreme Court ruled Aadhaar could not be made a condition for welfare payments. In its new avatar, consumers who do not have Aadhaar numbers will receive cash in their bank accounts, but they must shift to the Aadhaar-based system when they get their identity numbers.

"We have started receiving requests from consumers for linking Aadhaar numbers to bank accounts. The bank has already linked 83 per cent of accounts," said a senior executive with Karnataka Bank, which is linking accounts in Mysore, one of the 54 districts where the cash transfer scheme is rolling. He said the bank was rushing to clear the backlog since April, when no new requests came in for linking bank accounts.


To ensure a consumer has cash to pay for the first cylinder at the market price, a permanent advance will be paid as soon as he books gas after joining the scheme. Also consumers have three months to switch over to the Aadhaar system, during which they will receive gas cylinders at subsidised prices
.