In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

5979 - Aadhaar for quick passport: Is Modi government slyly getting around SC order? - First Biz



The NDA government is sailing pretty close to the wind by trying to sidestep a Supreme Court order that specifically says that Aadhaar, the Unique biometric ID being issued to residents (and not necessarily citizens) by the Unique ID Authority of India (UIDAI), cannot be made mandatory for anything.

In two separate cases, one in September 2013, and another in March 2014, the Supreme Court not only said that Aadhaar cannot be insisted upon for the delivery of subsidised products like LPG, but also that the government has to withdraw all orders that make the use of this ID mandatory.

There are no signs that this is happening.

Ever since Narendra Modi has been sold on the idea, the government has been stepping up efforts to make the use of Aadhaar widespread. However, it seems to be using a pressure tactic that makes life easier for those who use Aadhaar without openly flouting the Supreme Court orders.

In the Jan Dhan Yojana for opening zero-balance bank accounts for the poor, the use of Aadhaar has been more or less ubiquitous.

The newspapers today (11 November) report that you will get your passport issued faster if you have an Aadhaar. The Indian Express says that the “centre is likely to do away with police verification prior to the issuance of a passport, if the applicant has a UIDAI number…”. This is clearly an inducement for applicants to get the Aadhaar so that they can get their passports within a month’s time. Or else…

The LPG subsidy scheme, which is being rapidly shifted to direct cash transfer mode from 15 November, will depend substantially on Aadhaar as authentication. There may be no formal note indicating that this is mandatory in view of the Supreme Court’s orders, but who will argue about this at the LPG dealers’ end? Your ordinary LPG consumer will quietly go and get herself an Aadhaar to avoid hassles.

A few days ago, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, under fire for his stand on disclosing the names of black money holders in foreign banks, announced that he would like to make Aadhaar compulsory for real estate transactions. The idea, says a story in Mint, is that it will “provide a trail of all real estate transactions by an individual.”

This is a red herring. Real estate transactions already mandate so much documentation that anyone who wants to follow the trail can do so. Among other things, PAN card numbers are mandatory for property transactions, and even lease agreements call for police verifications. Not only that, to prevent the seller from escaping capital gains taxes, the buyer of a property has to deduct 1 percent TDS from the payment and deposit it with the taxman, complete with seller’s details.
So, Aadhaar is hardly going to make things even better. If Jaitley wants to sniff black money in realty transactions, the scent should already be reaching his office.

What is becoming clear is that for various reasons, the Modi government is emphasising Aadhaar even more than the UPA. But we have not heard even preliminary noises about legislation to make Aadhaar fully above board and legal, and with in-built privacy protection provisions.

The Express report, for example, says that the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) is being asked to “establish a system for validation of criminal antecedents for the applicant.” Passport applicants will then be checked with the NCRB’s records for criminal antecedents.

If Aadhaar is going to be linked to the NCRB’s database, one cannot escape the suspicion that sooner than latter Aadhaar is going to be a critical element in monitoring citizen activity from an internal and external security point of view.

As I have noted before, by pushing Aadhaar without any legal protection for the citizen, enormous power is put in the hands of governments and bureaucrats. Any society that values citizen’s rights should be wary of keeping an entire population’s biometric and personal details in huge databases controlled by a faceless bureaucracy. We need only refer to the widespread accessing of mobile call data records by the powerful to know how much misuse is possible.

Aadhaar is being sold as a way to empower the poor who don’t have an identity but need government subsidies to survive. But it is being covertly pushed to the entire population using the coercive power of the bureaucrat’s pen. If bank accounts, provident funds, mutual funds, gas connections, and big financial transactions of citizens are going to need an Aadhaar number, this means the government has forced a unique ID on us indirectly without even legally being entitled to do so. Now you can add passports and real estate transactions to the list of coercive actions that will push Aadhaar.

Aadhaar empowers the state at the expense of the citizen. Once your income-tax numbers, bank accounts, credit card transactions, and asset purchases are linked through a common Aadhaar number, anyone in any part of a coercive tax system can blackmail you if your assets and financial details are leaked. Not only that, when the next big terror attack happens, suddenly the government will have a huge justification to use the data to track potential terrorists. After that, we will be sliding down a slippery slope to lower levels of privacy protection for all citizens.


We are getting into dangerous territory from the citizen’s privacy protection point of view.