In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

7158 - Link accounts for subsidy on LPG cylinders by March in Kolhapur - TNN

TNN | Jan 4, 2015, 04.47AM IST

As part of the MDBTL scheme, the cash subsidy is deposited in the bank accounts of the beneficiaries, who will buy the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders at market prices.

KOLHAPUR: The district administration has set a deadline of March 31 for LPG customers to have their Aadhaar numbers and bank accounts linked for receiving cash subsidy under the Modified Direct Benefit Transfer of LPG (MDBTL) scheme. 

In case the customers do not have an Aadhaar number, they can still receive the subsidy provided their bank accounts and LPG consumer numbers are linked. 

As part of the MDBTL scheme, the cash subsidy is deposited in the bank accounts of the beneficiaries, who will buy the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders at market prices. 

The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had launched the scheme in 2013, which could not move forward as planned, however, as it was made mandatory for consumers to link their Aadhaar numbers and bank accounts. The scheme has since been modified and renamed PAHAL or 'Pratyaksh Hanstantarit Labh'. 

The scheme now allows those who have not received their Aadhaar cards but have registered for the same to provide proof of their registration and have their accounts linked. The cash will then be transferred to the accounts of the beneficiaries a week after they buy the cylinders. 

In the district so far, only 35.66% of LPG customers have linked their accounts under the scheme that started from January 1. There are about 23 gas agencies in the district, where Aadhaar enrolment counters have been set up. 

District supply officer (DSO) Vivek Agavane, said, "We have called the meetings with all the stakeholders of the scheme - officials of banks and LPG suppliers - to speed up the process of linking accounts." 

If a customer wants to go for the online process, the customers has to log on either to the website of the petroleum ministry (http:www.petroleum.nic.in) or that of the district administration (http:/Kolhapur.inc.in) for linking the Aadhaar number and the bank account. 

On the petroleum ministry's website, customers can enter their Aadhaar numbers along with their LPG consumer numbers for linking. Customers who do not have an Aadhaar number can either furnish their bank account information - including name, account number and IFSC code - to their LPG distributors, or give their 17-digit LPG consumer numbers to the bank. 

Of the total number of LPG connection holders in the district, 30.19% have linked their Aadhaar numbers and bank accounts, while only 5.47% of them have linked their LPG consumer numbers with their bank accounts. 

"We are going to complete the linking of the accounts before March 31. The Aadhar enrolment is underway and we will cover the LPG connection holders on the priority basis," said a district official on the condition of anonymity. 

In Nashik district last week, LPG distributors were accused of cancelling the bookings of customers who had not submitted their bank account or Aadhaar numbers for the direct benefit transfer scheme. 

The distributors were not only cancelling the customers' bookings, but were also claiming that it was done on the customers' request. District Supply Officer (DSO) Dnyaneshwar Jawanjal said the distributors had no right to cancel the delivery orders unless the customers were not at their residences as mentioned in the blue book (LPG book). 

"The distributors cannot cancel orders in any case and they cannot do so on their own. More importantly, the consumer has no choice of cancelling the delivery of a cylinder after booking it. So what the distributors are saying is invalid," the official had said, promising to look into the matter. 

The district supply office and sales officers of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) companies later asked distributors not to cancel the refill orders of customers for non-compliance with the requirements of the Direct Benefit Transfer of LPG (DBTL) scheme. 

"After going through the complaints about wrong methods of coercing consumers to present their papers by arbitrarily cancelling the refill cylinder orders, we have asked officers of the companies to look into the case and stop such moves at once and ensure that no orders were cancelled," district supply officer Dnyanesh Jawanjal said. 

There were instances of refill orders of several LPG consumers being cancelled arbitrarily by the distributors. "There is no room for a customer to request cancellation of a refill order. Yet, the messages generated by the respective LPG companies to the customers were that the 'order was cancelled as per your request'. This means that the customer had applied for cancellation of the order. This is a lie," said Vandana Sonawane, a resident of Nashik Road who received the message. 

Jawanjal said the message was brought to the notice of the LPG companies, which went through it and confirmed the fact. "There were some distributors who had sent such messages for want of papers that the customers had not sent to them. But since there were no such orders to cancel the refill orders, we have asked the companies to monitor and take action against all the erring distributors," he added. 


The company officials also said they have asked the distributors from refraining to using the clause unless any customer had genuinely refused to take the delivery.