In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, April 13, 2015

7765 - PM's idea to track kids from birth hits practical hurdles - Buisness Standard


Modi's idea was on the lines of Social Security Number (SSN) given to the children at the time of birth in the US


Sahil Makkar  |  New Delhi  April 11, 2015 Last Updated at 22:19 IST

In a meeting last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi directed his top officials to ensure full enrollment of children below six years under Aadhaar and use its on-line system to track children from birth. Modi's idea, according to senior government officials, was on the lines of Social Security Number (SSN) given to the children at the time of birth in the US.

The SSN helps in opening a bank account, obtaining medical coverage and applying government services for the child. The SSN is applied at the time of birth registration of the child.

Modi's idea was to concurrently give Aadhaar and birth certificate. Following Modi's directions, a meeting was convened between the officials of the erstwhile Planning Commission, now Niti Aayog, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the National Population Registrar (NPR), and other ministries.

In the meeting, it was decided to run a pilot project before launching a full-scale scheme for birth registration and simultaneously capture biometric details of around 20 million children born every year in the country. Till now, the Aadhaar is only given to children aged above six years.

"The pilot project was launched on February 23 at Tigaon primary health centre in Faridabad because of its proximity to the capital," says a high-ranking government official, requesting anonymity.

The results at the camp, however, were disappointing. The mothers had to hold their newborns in upright position till the computer captured the acceptable image. The officials found that it was causing hardship to both children and their mothers. Then there was another problem. The infant in the photographs lacked distinguishing features. "They all look the same, so their pictures made no sense," the official added.

In another meeting held at the Niti Aayog on March 16, it was decided that the current approach to provide Aadhaar to children below six years was not feasible and causing distress to people. The meeting was attended by officials from the UIDAI, NPR, ministry of women and child development, ministry of health and the ministry of human resource development.

"On simplifying Aadhaar enrollment of children, it was suggested that the requirement of photo of the children serves little purpose and causes considerable hardship and should be dispensed with… UIDAI shall seriously explore the option of exempting child's photograph and relaxing requirements of name for enrolling children below five years," said the minutes of the meetings reviewed by Business Standard.

The name and picture are a must for the generation of an Aadhaar. However, in India, most of the children are not named soon after their birth. Currently, the officials are considering linking the birth registration number to the biometrics details of the parents. "The possibility of using birth registration number, which is also unique, to register children in Aadhaar needs to be explored. Biometric details of children on attaining six years can be captured," the minutes noted.

The government is also planning to build linkages between Civil Registration System (CRS) and NPR so that an updated register of births, residents is available for use of all service departments. CRS is system for registering birth and death where as NPR has rest of the details on an individual.

"Recalling the directive of the Prime Minister to ensure full enrolment under Aadhaar and to use Aadhaar-based online system to track children from birth, it was suggested that CRS ought to capture all required details on children. Hence, the responsibility for enrolment in Aadhaar at the time of birth registration should lie in a single authority, which is the Registrar of Births, who should be suitably empowered to fulfil the role," the minutes read.