In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, April 18, 2015

7799 - NITI Aayog plans subsidy regime revamp - Live Mint

FIRST PUBLISHED: FRI, APR 17 2015. 12 12 AM IST

Planning body wants to use data from Aadhaar, Jan Dhan scheme and census to better target subsidy regime

Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint

New Delhi: NITI Aayog, the successor to the Planning Commission, proposes to marry data from the unique identity project Aadhaar, the Jan Dhan accounts opened by banks as part of the government’s eponymous financial inclusion drive and the socioeconomic and caste census to better target subsidies.

The plan has been inspired by the so-called JAM (Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, Mobile) trinity proposed by the finance ministry.
Once effected, this approach will provide a fillip to the direct transfers of food and fertilizer subsidies to their intended beneficiaries and eliminate intermediaries and leakages. Given recent statements, including by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging the rich to voluntarily give up subsidies, the creation of such a database may eventually make it easier for the government to not only better target subsidies but also restrict them.

In an interview, Niti Aayog member Bibek Debroy said that thus far, direct benefit transfers (DBT) have been confined to cooking gas subsidies and the transfers of pensions and student scholarships.

“We are trying to take stock of how and to what extent we can marry different sets of databases (to push the DBT agenda). The matching is difficult, but I am setting this out as a target. There is the Aadhaar database, there is the Jan Dhan Yojana database, there will be a database of the socio-economic survey,” Debroy said.

The JAM trinity was originally proposed by chief economic adviser in the finance ministry Arvind Subramanian in the Economic Survey 2014-15. A day later, finance minister Arun Jaitley said in his budget speech that the government would focus on the JAM trinity to implement DBT.

“The JAM Trinity will allow us to transfer benefits in a leakage-proof, well-targeted and cashless manner,” he said.

The estimated direct fiscal cost of both central and state government subsidies on products and services such as rice, wheat, pulses, sugar, kerosene, cooking gas, naphtha, water, electricity, fertilizer, and iron ore is about Rs.3.78 trillion, or about 4.2%, of gross domestic product (GDP).

A panel constituted by the Modi government under former food minister Shanta Kumar to overhaul the 50-year-old Food Corporation of India (FCI) has recommended direct cash transfers of food subsidy in the name of the female head of the family, linking it to Jan Dhan bank accounts and Aadhaar unique identity numbers.

The committee, which submitted its report in January, has estimated that this can save the government up to Rs.35,000 crore “which can be ploughed back to agriculture through investments in irrigation and building better roads and markets network”. The panel also suggested that the fertiliser subsidy be given directly to farmers in cash and the fertilizer sector be completely deregulated.

Debroy said implementation of the plan will take time as states are still verifying the socio-economic and caste census data.
The socio-economic and caste census has surveyed all rural households in the country to collect data on literacy, housing, assets and caste. Once done, data for each administrative region has to be presented before the gram panchayats (village councils), which need to verify it.

Still, the merger of the streams of data will be useful in expanding DBT to food and fertilizer subsidies as well as to areas such as issuing soil health cards and kisan credit cards, Debroy said.

Himanshu, an associate professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi, and a Mint columnist, said while the concept is good, the data of the socio-economic and caste census need to be tested for beneficiaries of the National Food Security Act.
“It also needs to be remembered that the survey will only give you data, but will not tell you who is poor and who is not poor. The government needs set benchmarks to create the target groups,” he added.

Former Planning Commission member N.C. Saxena said one problem is that most of the Jan Dhan accounts that have been opened are not operational and bank branches are far from the villages, making it difficult for a large part of the rural population to access accounts. The socio economic and caste census is yet to be completed, he added.

“The methodology under which the survey is being carried out is faulty and hence if the government relies on these survey results, it will end up targeting the well-off,” Saxena said. .
More than 130 million Jan Dhan bank accounts have been opened and 757 million Aadhaar numbers issued in India, which has some 904 million mobile phone connections.

“It is possible to envisage that when the JAM trinity becomes linked, the goal of periodic and seamless financial transfers to bank accounts after identification through the Aadhaar number can be implemented with immeasurable benefits to helping the lives of the poor,” the Economic Survey said.

“Even as it focuses on second- and third-generation reforms in factor markets, India will then be able to complete the basic first-generation reforms. This will be the grand bargain in the political economy of Indian reforms,” it added.

The Economic Survey, critiquing the present subsidy regime, said cash-based transfers based on the JAM trinity offer possibilities to effectively target public resources to those who need it most. “Success in this area will allow prices to be liberated to perform their role of efficiently allocating resources and boosting long-run growth,” it said.

According to the survey, electricity subsidies benefit mainly the relatively wealthy 67.2% of households that are electrified and a large fraction of subsidies allocated to water utilities are spent on subsidizing private taps when 60% of poor households get their water from public taps.

The Economic Survey said that while at first glance, kerosene seems a good candidate for price subsidy as it is popularly conceived to be consumed mainly by the poor, 59% of subsidized kerosene allocated through the public distribution system (PDS) is actually consumed by households, with the remainder lost to leakages. Only 46% of total kerosene consumption is by poor households, it said.

“Even in the case of the food distributed via the PDS, leakages are very high (about 15% for rice and 54% for wheat, with most of these leakages concentrated in the above the poverty line segment),” the survey added.