In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, April 17, 2015

7788 - Some gains but a lot remains to be done for third gender - TNN


Payal Gwalani,TNN | Apr 16, 2015, 03.43 PM IST

NAGPUR: It has been exactly a year since the Supreme Court gave the third gender identity to those who were previously only known as hijras and transgenders. A lot has happened over the last few months to give the community members a chance to do things they had not done ever before. However, several of the measures suggested by the court still remain on paper, even as social stigma and discrimination continue to haunt those belonging to the third gender. 

The court had said the third gender was to be identified as other backward classes and the associated benefits should be extended to them. The central and state governments were also asked to devise social welfare schemes for the community. On Wednesday, NGO Sarathi Trust and Bharatiya Kinner Sarva Samaja Seva Samiti marked the one-year of the landmark judgment by observing Kinner Day. A massive rally with more than 500 participants was taken out on the occasion. 

"Some good things have happened after last year's judgment. RTM Nagpur University now allows students who identify themselves as belonging to the third gender in its colleges and departments. We have also been able to get several official documents like Aadhaar and voting cards in place. Many of us could participate in the state assembly elections in October," recounted Uttam Baba Senapati, president of Kinner Sarva Samaja Seva Samiti. She believes the community must be given political reservation like women so that their issues reach the policymakers and are properly addressed. 

Transgender Vidya Kamble believes that despite all the assurances and provisions, individuals need to work towards getting the rights accorded to them by the law. "The university and colleges may be okay with us enrolling, however, most transgenders and hijras would be too embarrassed to face the reaction of their fellow students and teachers. When we go to any public place, even a bank, people will do anything to shoo us away. At times, they give us money as they only associate us with approaching people for money. This belief among people needs to change and society needs to become more sensitive towards us. If they can't treat and see us as people, how can they see us as citizen," she asked. 

"Implementation of all the directives of Supreme Court has not happened and some have been implemented in a broken, segmented manner. The third gender option, for example, does not appear in all official forms. We have been given the right to adopt a child and get married but the general public is not aware of it. If we walk into an adoption agency or a registrar's office with such a demand, we would be driven away," said Amruta Soni, a Chhattisgarh-based advocacy officer for People Living with HIV (PLHIV). She also pointed out that the level of health access for community was especially bad and needed to be dealt with urgently. 

Senapati concluded by saying, "We wouldn't be required to fight the day parents accept their third gender children instead of driving them away." 

A quest for equality for the marginalized 

The supreme court mandate: 

All major documents to have the third gender option with the idea of bringing members of the community into mainstream 

Recognition of third gender as other backward classes and provision of the associated educational and employment opportunities 

Central and state governments were asked to devise social welfare schemes for members of the third gender and take care of their medical requirements 

Government was asked to run public awareness campaigns aimed at removal of social stigma and discrimination against hijras and transgenders 

Separate facilities for third gender in public toilets, hospitals and other such places 

Some positive outcomes: 

Nagpur University has allowed third gender students to enroll in affiliated colleges 

Aadhaar, voting cards issued to transgenders 

Things that need to be done: 

Better health access 

Political reservation 

Dispelling social stigma and being more sensitive to the needs of third gender