In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 9, 2015

8440 - End of Privacy is Death Knell for Indian Democracy - New Indian Express

By Serish Nanisetti
Published: 05th August 2015 06:00 AM

Privacy is a cornerstone of any democracy. The constitutional sanctity accorded to a vote, the right to life with dignity and the right to liberty are all emblematic of this. But in India of 2015, privacy is being chiselled away bit by bit. If the government’s top judicial officer Mukul Rohtagi told the Supreme Court that the right to privacy is not a fundamental right, he was just stating what is happening in the country. Led by a retrograde judiciary, a shortsighted bureaucracy and politicians with an authoritarian streak, the last nail has been hit on the coffin of privacy. The views and opinions about Aadhaar that the government has shared with the SC are brazen symptoms of the deep rot.

The SC’s views are no different, as can be seen from its verdict on Section 377, where it held that even consensual gay sex is illegal. The apex court believes that it’s the government’s job to not only know what a person does for living but it also wants to know what he does in his bedroom. This erosion of privacy has become a malaise. At a time when the world is waking up to digital snooping by governments, thanks to Edward Snowden’s revelations, and searching for legal remedies and balancing legitimate tracking of criminals with that of privacy for its law-abiding citizens, India is hurtling in another direction. Another sinister step is the creation of Goods and Services Tax Network, a Section 25, not for profit private limited company, headed by a former IAS officer from Bihar. Among its shareholders are private sector banks like HDFC and ICICI Bank. Nothing wrong with that. But the story takes a scary turn when we realise that this private company, partly owned by banks, will soon have access to all the tax data held by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, both direct and indirect tax. No government has attempted something like this where tax compliance is at the mercy of a private data company. The GSTN calls itself a company set up primarily to provide IT infrastructure and services to the Central and state governments, tax payers and other stakeholders for implementation of the Goods and Services Tax.

At a time when Big Data and Data Mining have reached a stage where an algorithm can predict what day of the month and at what time a person will buy a book or a bottle of scotch, the GSTN information network is a sure recipe for a data disaster. The massive trove of data collected by CBDT and Central Board of Excise and Customs over the years is set to be handed over to the fledgling GSTN that has an authorised capital of `10 crores. The history of GSTN dates back to 2011 when an advisory group headed by Nandan Nilekani came up with five tech-driven initiatives for government financial projects: IT Department, National Pension Scheme, RBI, and for tracking government expenditure and GSTN for the GST. Now, with a clear timeline for rollout of GST, it is only days before all the tax data ranging from that big industrialist to neighbourhood shopowner to your own data will be in the hands of a private party.

This is not a reassuring thought considering even companies that are investing huge amounts of money on data security are reporting breaches. The latest to fall a victim to data breach is Ashley Madison, a website for married people who want to cheat. Thankfully, the hackers threatened not the individual cheaters but issued a diktat that the website be shut down. Even government databases are not safe. Only a few days ago, two hackers gained access to the Telangana Governments Mee Seva servers and siphoned of `13 lakh before being caught.
Part of the problem with Aadhaar stems from the fact that the personal biometric data has been collected by private parties without any guarantees about privacy. The data is being collected (last count 800 million people’s information) in the absence of any legal or constitutional framework or guidelines about its usage or storage. By the time the SC finishes gives its learned verdict on a batch of petitions challenging validity of Aadhaar, the government is likely to present it with a fait accompli. If the SC rules that Aadhaar is invalid, it will look ridiculous after so much money has been spent on it. If it rules Aadhaar data collection as legit, then the question of citizen privacy becomes null and void. The SC will have to draw a fine balance between privacy and use of Aadhaar data. In 2012, a Group of Experts headed by Justice (retd) A P Shah created a framework of guidelines for Privacy Act. It wanted the law to address concerns about data protection, safety, intrusion, surveillance and physical privacy. Forget about creation of such a law, we are in the midst of the biggest intrusive data collection by the government. In the current session of Parliament, PM Narendra Modi is piloting a Human DNA Profiling Bill. This overarching Bill must be the most intrusive piece of law that targets privacy anywhere in the world. Though it appears as if it is aimed at tracking criminals, solving rape cases and resolving cases of missing persons, the draft bill is an eye-opener. Besides the offender, even the DNA profiles of suspects and volunteers will be acquired to create a database. And this may be used not just in criminal cases but also in civil ones. While all this make it appear as if the Bill may be useful in solving cases, what it leaves out is the question of privacy.
The bill seeks creation of DNA Profiling Board, headquartered in Hyderabad, that will oversee creation of a DNA information bank. Once, a person’s DNA is added to the database it will remain there for perpetuity. The DNA is the very basis of our identity. Creating a databank is not wrong, but the question is that of its security. Without adequate data protection and robust privacy laws in place, these new sets of organisations with their dragnets of information with intrusive data collection methods would be a disaster. And a government that collects massive troves of data with untrammelled access to even physical and financial data can easily predict the behaviour of its citizens and in every five years its voters. Do we want a government that knows whom we are going to vote? Do we want a government to hand over the most private information about our financial well-being or the lack of it to a private party? Already, India is an abyss when it comes to digital privacy as smartphones, apps and data mining software create profiles of a billion citizens without their knowledge or explicit consent. It is one thing that a private company harvests data to peddle gizmos or fashion accessories and quite another thing when a government harvests personal and financial data and hands it over to private companies. This is ticking time bomb of privacy whose consequences can be disastrous for the individual and for the country’s democracy as we know it.