AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 8571 - Burden of proof: Spelling error in ID holds up grieving mother's compensation

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, August 20, 2015

8571 - Burden of proof: Spelling error in ID holds up grieving mother's compensation - TNN

Burden of proof: Spelling error in ID holds up grieving mother's compensation

Arita Sarkar & Nilesh Wairkar,Mumbai Mirror | Aug 19, 2015, 11.06 AM IST

Indu Survade, 43, who lives in a Goregaon hutment, is now going through the cumbersome process of reapplying for ID proof. (Pic: Nilesh Wairkar)

A poor Goregaon woman who lost her teenage son in a railway accident seven years ago has been unable to claim compensation because of a spelling error in her identity cards. Indu Survade, 43, who cannot read or write properly, is now trying to get a new set of identification papers and learn how to sign her name in Hindi.

Indu was awarded Rs 4 lakh by the Railway Claims Tribunal in 2013, but fraud-wary authorities have held back the money because her first name has been erroneously mentioned as "Indutai" in her voter ID, Aadhaar and PAN cards.

Indu said that she never registered her name as Indutai, but officials have asked her to produce a valid document with the correct name to claim the compensation.

The case underscores the problems with the rigid and outmoded requirement for multiple identity cards in our country: Indu's name was first misspelt in her voter ID card, which she was still compelled to use to apply for Aadhaar and PAN cards. All her identification documents now have the wrong spelling.

"I never went to school and neither did my children. I don't even know how to sign my name. When these ID cards came, I didn't realise that my name had been spelt incorrectly," Indu, who lives in a hutment with her seven sons, said. "All the cards have my picture, but the court is not ready to accept them."

Indu intends to surrender her PAN card and reapply for a new one with the correct name. For the past few weeks, she has been trying to learn to sign her name in Hindi. The existing PAN card does not bear her signature; her thumbprint was used on most documents.

Indu's 18-year-old son, Vilas, died in 2008 after falling off a moving train in Andheri. She then filed an appeal for compensation with the railway tribunal. Around the same time, she applied for voter ID and Aadhaar cards, which she thought she might need as part of the legal process.

The case went on for over four years before the tribunal ruled in 2013 that she should be given compensation of Rs 4 lakh. Indu's lawyer, Bhavar Shukla, said that authorities refused to sanction the money as the name mentioned in Indu's affidavit didn't match with that on her identity cards. "She had told me her name was Indu Survade and that's what I wrote in the affidavit. It's upsetting that she cannot claim the money because of an error made by government officials who issued her the voter ID card," Shukla said.

Of her seven sons, only one currently has a job. Vishal, 25, drives a garbage truck. "We don't have a house and often end up on the footpath. If we get the compensation, we can buy a house," he said.