In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 24, 2015

8592 - Is Aadhaar enough? - Business Standard




It will take some more time for the Aadhaar card to gain full legitimacy, though it seems wise even now to arm yourself with one. For investment-related transactions, a PAN is also required, for now
Priya Nair 


August 23, 2015 Last Updated at 22:45 IST

Last week, the Supreme Court directed that an Aadhaar (the unique citizen identification) card not be mandatory for direct benefit transfers such as a cooking gas subsidy or distribution of foodgrain; however, it can be used as one of the proofs.

At the same time, this year onwards the income tax department has said, if the Aadhaar number is linked to the PAN number, taxpayers need not send their physical I-T return forms to the processing centre. The Aadhaar number is sufficient verification.

Why the confusion regarding Aadhaar? Why is it allowed for some financial transactions but not for others?

For instance, if you want to open a bank account, buy an insurance policy or invest in mutual funds, it it technically possible to do it with only your Aadhaar card. All regulators - Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and Insurance and Regulatory Development Authority of India (Irdai) - have said the Aadhaar card is sufficient as proof of both identity and address.

Yet, at the ground level, most institutions ask for additional documents. A bank may ask you for utility bills of the past three months, as proof of residence. This is to prove the customer has not changed house, says Jairam Sreedharan, president, Axis Bank. "The Aadhaar card is not very common, yet. That is why we ask for other proof. But, it is possible to open a bank account with only an Aadhaar card," he says. Only recently has the government enabled the feature to change the address on the Aadhaar card.

Life insurance companies may ask for the PAN card, as it is the standard proof of age. Here, age of the buyer is very important, since it is linked to the premium on the policy. But, after Irdai's guideline, insurance companies are working on accepting Aadhaar as standard age proof, says an official from a private life insurance company.

For any Sebi or exchange-related transaction, a PAN is mandatory as proof, from the uniqueness point of view. Another advantage of PAN is that it is easy for the I-T department to identity customers. So, if Aadhaar has to be made the mandatory proof, it will require a lot of changes at the back-end, says Prasannan Keshavan, operations head, ICICI Securities.

Yet, given the database of Aadhaar, it is probably only a matter of time before it becomes widely accepted. "The PAN database is about 150 million. The passport database is 60-70 million. So, Aadhaar has a much wider coverage," adds Keshavan.

At a recent mutual fund event, Nimesh Shah, managing director, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company, said the KYC (Know Your Customer) norms for in-person verification were cumbersome and needed to be made simpler. His suggestion was to integrate Aadhaar into the KYC process. "Aadhaar has already done in-person verification. So, if we integrate Aadhaar, we can widen our customer base," he said.

Some practical problems with Aadhaar are unclear photographs and smudged signatures. This makes it difficult for financial institutions to digitise documents presented as proof for future use. "Today, we accept the Aadhaar card for bank accounts. But, for demat and trading accounts we also ask for PAN and other proof and photo identity, due to the practical problems. There are also issues like multiple Aadhaar cards having the same address, similar to the ration card," says Jyoteesh Kumar, ·head of marketing at HDFC Securities.

Even so, Aadhaar will in due course become the number one document because more fields can be accessed using that number, as compared to the PAN number. "When we move towards unified KYC across all financial transactions and more details get captured into the system, it will get cleaned up. Then, Aadhaar will become the main number," Kumar says.

Most experts believe it is only a matter of time before Aadhaar becomes the one-point document for all proof of identity.

The biggest benefit of Aadhaar has been in reducing the cases of bogus identity documents and reducing of duplication, says N C Saxena, former member of the National Advisory Council. "Earlier, people needed 20 different documents for one task. Now, that is not the case. It is true that for different purposes, different documents are required, but that depends on the nature of the service. For poor people who don't have a driver's license or passport, Aadhaar is the one point document," he says.

Other than direct benefits, Aadhaar is also used for pension, scholarships, kisan card services, etc.

The main problem is how to make Aadhaar viable. For instance, using Aadhaar, about 170 million Jan Dhan accounts have been opened. But, very few of these are active or have money. These are only paper achievements, says Saxena.

Aadhaar is essential because other instruments like ration cards have not served the purpose of establishing a unique identity, says Ashvin Parekh, of Ashvin Parekh Advisory Services. With the Supreme Court saying Aadhaar is not the only mandatory proof, some action might be required by the Parliament.

"If banks insist on other proof, it is to protect themselves from any risk that could arise in future. But, that does not in any way undermine Aadhaar's validity," he says.

HOW TO ENROL FOR AADHAAR CARD

Enrolling for Aadhaar is free

Go to any authorised Aadhaar enrollment centre in India with your identity and address proof

Check enrolment centres close to your residence on the UIDAI website. You can also request for an appointment to visit the centre, on the website

UIDAI accepts any of 18 documents as proof of identity and 33 as proof of address

At the enrolment centre, fill your personal details in the form. Your photo, finger-prints and iris scan will also be taken

You can review the details and make any changes at the centre itself

Once your application is successful, an Aadhaar number will be generated and mailed to your address. This could take up to three months

Sharing of bank accounts is voluntary, not mandatory