In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 24, 2015

8594 - SC ruling on Aadhaar puts Digital India plan in jeopardy - Live Mint



Ruling to affect top govt initiatives such as biometric attendance, Jan Dhan Yojana, digital certificates, pension payments

Saurabh Kumar Apurva Vishwanath

New Delhi: Top initiatives of the government such as biometric attendance, Jan Dhan Yojana, digital certificates, pension payments and more recently the introduction of payments banks, which critically depend on the Aadhaar unique identity number, are in jeopardy.

This is because a Supreme Court ruling on 11 August restricts the use of the Aadhaar number as eKYC (electronic know-your-customer) to distribution of cooking gas cylinders, kerosene and foodgrain through the public distribution system.

Through the use of eKYC, customers can get their credentials verified without physical documents by allowing the bank to access their proof of identity, address, email address and mobile number linked to their Aadhaar numbers.

The grant of payments bank licences last week has triggered the realization in government that the apex court’s rulings, unless clarified, will be an impediment. The government has approached the attorney general’s office for consultation to allow these new entities to use eKYC to sign up customers, according to a person close to the development.

“In all likelihood, the Supreme Court may be moved for permission,” said the person, who did not want to be identified as the matter was still being debated.

How Aadhaar plugs leakages in PDS and LPG subsidy transfer
Aadhaar is not mandatory, says SC in interim order
According to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) rules, “the operations of the (payments) bank should be fully networked and technology driven from the beginning, conforming to generally accepted standards and norms”.

This implies eKYC is integral to their operations. RBI guidelines state that any bank willing to use the Unique Identification Authority of India’s (UIDAI) eKYC service is required to sign an agreement with UIDAI.

But the process of eKYC may be a violation of the apex court’s order as the affidavit submitted in the Supreme Court by the attorney general says that personal information of an Aadhaar cardholder through biometrics or otherwise is not shared with any other person or authority.

The apex court made the interim ruling on 11 August in an ongoing hearing where several pleas related to Aadhaar have been clubbed together. Some relate to Aadhaar numbers being made mandatory to avail of certain government benefits and services. Others deal with the number itself being a violation of an individual’s privacy, especially in the absence of any backing regulation or oversight, and some deal with possible misuse of the information.

Anish Gupta, additional advocate general of Haryana and an advocate for the petitioners who challenged the validity of the Aadhaar scheme, said that any sharing of information by UIDAI will amount to contempt of court.

“If it was already in use by some entities, then that amounts to a violation of the Supreme Court’s interim order. Even if the government wants payment banks to use Aadhaar, it will be challenged in the court. The central government can’t share any details given by an individual during Aadhaar enrollment with any party,” he added.

In eKYC, a customer provides the 12-digit Aadhaar number at a financial service provider’s centre and inputs biometrics through a UIDAI-compliant reader. The encrypted data is sent to the Central Identities Data Repository of UIDAI. If the Aadhaar number and biometrics match, the eKYC form with the financial services provider is populated with the customer’s details such as name, date of birth, gender, address, photograph, among other details.

However, Satya Poddar, partner-policy advisory group at consultant EY, said that in this case, the Aadhaar number is only used to validate the information that the financial services provider already has from the customer. “Here, the authority is not proactively giving out the information to the bank, but is only reconfirming when the customer is voluntarily providing biometrics. So, my impression is that it may not be a violation,” added Poddar.

The eKYC process is an ongoing process, according to A.P. Hota, chief executive officer and managing director, National Payments Corp. of India, which also operates a gateway for eKYC.

“It (eKYC) will be our default option as 95% of the population that we will deal with have Aadhaar cards. It will allow customers to have access to services immediately,” said Rajeev Arora, chief technology officer, FINO PayTech Ltd, one of the recipients of the payments bank licence.


Arora, however, added that people who do have Aadhaar will be allowed to submit other documents for KYC. But this process takes a few days time as papers need to be verified with the authorities concerned. Vodafone m-pesa Ltd and Airtel M Commerce Services Ltd, two other payments bank licence winners, said they have not yet decided on the operational details. The other eight licence winners are Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd, Cholamandalam Distribution Services Ltd, the department of posts, National Securities Depository Ltd, Reliance Industries Ltd, Dilip Shanghvi (founder of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd), Vijay Shekhar Sharma (founder of PayTM) and Tech Mahindra Ltd.