In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, August 21, 2017

11802 - No Ration for the poor as Biometric Authentication for Aadhaar Fails - News Click



Internet connectivity issues in Rajasthan have resulted in 33% of ration card holders unable to procure their ration from the PDS outlets.

Newsclick Report 18 Aug 2017

Newsclick Graphic by Shoili
A group of civil society activists have demanded that the CEO of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), Ajay Bhushan Pandey, hold a public discussion where evidence can be presented of the impact of the mandatory Aadhaar-based biometric authentication on the delivery of public services.

The activists — Anjali Bhardwaj, Nikhil Dey, Dipa Sinha and Amrita Johri — wrote to Pandey on August 17, after he attributed “malafide intent” to a press conference organised by them exposing exclusions in the Public Distribution System (PDS) in Rajasthan, Jharkhand and Delhi after biometric authentication was made mandatory each time the beneficiaries queued up to get ration.

They had also presented the result of two Right to Information (RTI) applications, revealing that there was no official data to back the claim, that nearly 4 crore bogus ration cards had been eliminated through use of technology and Aadhaar. This was a statement made by the Prime Minister in the Lok Sabha on February 7.

Pandey told the media, that saying Aadhaar was responsible for the denial of public benefits, was a “misconstrued fact presented with malafide intent.”

The UIDAI chief also claimed that “if a person is denied [public benefits] because he does not have Aadhaar or he is unable to biometrically authenticate, it is undisputedly a violation of instructions issued by the government and such violators have to be punished”.

Responding to this, the activists wrote that they had “little knowledge of any such punishment that might have been ordered and carried out”. They demanded that the UIDAI make public “a copy of all such instructions issued by the government, especially in the context of Delhi, Jharkhand and Rajasthan. The copy should also include the punishment that violators are liable to face.”

“Also, kindly put the list of violators who have been punished in the last 3 years in the public domain,” they added, while inviting Pandey for a “public dialogue”.

“If you agree, we will fix a mutually convenient time and place,” the letter said.

On August 8, activists from the Right to Food Campaign (which was instrumental in the passage of the National Food Security Act 2013), Satark Nagrik Sangathan, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan and Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan, came together in Delhi to present their on-ground findings, about the impact of Aadhaar on welfare schemes — especially the PDS.

As of July 2017, in Rajasthan, 33% of the holders of the NFSA ration cards, which have been seeded with Aadhaar, were unable to procure their rations from the PDS outlets — because of repeated problems in biometric authentication of fingerprints, and internet connectivity issues in the Point of Sale machines.

The activists also presented interim findings from an IIT Delhi field study along with Ranchi University that showed flagrant exclusions as well as continuing quantity fraud, higher transaction costs and hardships for the most vulnerable sections of the population in Jharkhand, since Aadhaar linking was made mandatory for the PDS in the state.

The press conference also saw testimonies of beneficiaries from Delhi, including homeless people, some of whom have also filed affidavits in the Delhi High Court. They talked about the different ways in which they had been unable to access their ration entitlements since Aadhaar was made mandatory for ration.