In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

11985 - Cautioned govt about cost of demonetisation, says former RBI guv Raghuram Rajan - Times Now News


Updated: Sep 03, 2017 | 18:36 IST | Source - Times Now


“Have cautioned the Narendra Modi-led government about the short-term cost of demonetisation outweighing the long-term benefits”, former Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Raghuram Rajan told Times of India.

In his new book, 'I Do What I Do’: On Reforms Rhetoric and Resolve', which is slated to be released next week, the economist wrote, ““I was asked by the government in February 2016 for my view on demonetisation, which I gave orally. I made these views known in no uncertain terms.” He also offered ‘better alternatives’ to help the government achieve its main goals.

In an exclusive interview to TOI, Rajan also clarified that although RBI was consulted, at no point during his term, was it asked to make a decision on demonetisation.

Demonetisation has hit the nation’s poor the hardest, Rajan told TOI on Sunday. Demonetisation cannot be described as an economic success at this point; Rajan said adding that valuation at a later stage would give a clearer picture of the situation.
The cost of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s crackdown on black money and corruption or what we called as ‘demonetisation’, has caused the GDP to suffer.

In an exclusive interaction, Rajan was quoted as saying, “The estimates I have seen range from 1 to 2 percentage points, and that's a lot of money - over Rs 2 lakh crore and maybe approaching Rs 2.5 lakh crore.”

Speaking of the pressure from the government, Rajan said, “The duty of the central bank and other regulatory bodies is to work together under the overall direction of the elected representatives of the people. You cannot go off in a separate direction.”

“I didn't leave when my leave expired; there was absolutely no issue about extending my leave, if necessary. I left when the government and I could not agree on terms for me to stay on,” he further added.

The accelerated printing of the 2,000-rupee notes did make us better prepared for an eventual demonetisation without a specific date having been fixed, he added.

The Aadhaar-based system will give far better compliance on the flows, he said while speaking on the effective way for the government to dig out black money without hobbling the system.

“One way to do that is the broader use of Aadhaar in any financial investments because it gives the authorities a sense of what your entire wealth holdings might be,” Rajan was quoted.

The revelations come at a time when the government is facing intense outrage after the apex bank revealed that 99 percent of all demonetised notes have come back into the banking system.

“The fact that 99% has been deposited certainly does suggest that aim has not been met,” Rajan said in the interview.
Despite his reservations, Rajan wrote in his book, the RBI was asked to prepare a note, which it did and handed to the government.

The RBI note, he said, “outlined potential costs and benefits of demonetisation, as well as alternatives that could achieve similar objectives.” However, Rajan did not detail the contents of the note RBI had submitted to the government.


Giving his views on bank consolidation, he feels the quality of management in public sector banks needs to be raised.
Rajan also believes Goods and Services Tax (GST) will also help in curbing tax evasion in addition to uniting the country as a single market and reducing transactions.

Demitting his office on September 23, this is the first time the former governor has spoken on demonetisation.

On November 8 last year, the government announced the scrapping of old demonetised notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 in a bid to curb counterfeiting, black money, and corruption.
However, according to a data released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under the chairmanship of Governor Urjit Patel earlier this week, 99% of these notes were deposited in bank accounts.

Currently, distinguished service professor of finance at University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Rajan is an alumnus of IIT-D, IIM-A, and MIT.

Rajan’s book ‘I Do What I Do: On Reform, Rhetoric & Resolve’, will be available at bookstores from September 4.