In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, November 5, 2017

12261 - Aadhaar cards linked with mobile numbers are an Orwellian nightmare, offer ringside seat to Big Brother

Aadhaar cards linked with mobile numbers are an Orwellian nightmare, offer ringside seat to Big Brother

Oct, 27 2017 22:06:51 IST

In 1949, George Orwell wrote his famous novel 1984. Later, several films touched upon the issue of surveillance, including classics like Enemy of the State, the Net, Total Recall, Minority Report and Eagle Eye, not to mention the recent film Snowden.

In the present day, the Orwellian nightmare threatens to become worrisome, as the government plans to connect your Aadhaar card to your mobile phone number, thereby ensuring that what you write or say or comment will be available forever. Big Brother will not only be watching, he will be cataloguing your preferences, lifestyle and intrude into every aspect of life.
It is not very comforting to know that the promise of encryption has more holes in it than a piece of Swiss cheese. Encryption in say, Whatsapp, may be difficult to navigate for a third party but it can be hijacked en route and if your phone is already compromised, then information can easily be spiked and fed out to another source.

What if phones in the future are sold with the ‘bug’ already installed? Most of us would not even be aware.

Semi-fiction plots in which computers are installed in specific countries with ‘control’ in the hands of the manufacturing nation have already begun circulating. Their weaponry, their traffic, their electric grids, their lives can be then manipulated and rendered ineffective in case they turn renegade.

By using the bogey word ‘security,’ the government can access your personal life and invade your privacy, while convincing you that it is only interested in your safety and has no desire to look into your personal affairs.

If what you are saying sends up warning signals, you can then be tracked, on the grounds that you could be a risk to the country. Unfortunately, the fear of terrorism makes such an intrusion legitimate. The large majority of us would docilely accept being policed technologically, on the grounds that there is no other way to keep a vigil on those who mean us harm.
The so-called advantage of knowing which number is owned by whom comes to naught with the flow of burner phones, the ability to borrow each other’s instruments, to steal sim cards and also use the underground market for illegal sims that can be had for a mere Rs 100. Terrorists have the fiscal liquidity to buy into much more sophisticated telephony or route calls in a criss-cross of the planet, until the snarl would be impossible to unravel.

Let’s also keep in mind the 9 to 10 million foreigners who enter India every year (according to the department of tourism) and hundreds of thousands of the 34 million NRIs, all armed with international mobiles and you have to wonder how flimsy is this defense against a determined militant.

Scarier still is the fact that 40,000-odd phones get stolen every year. Many more cases are not reported. Consequently, at any given point of time, there are several thousand temporarily functioning mobile instruments with live sims.

With laptops and Ipads getting smaller, you do not even need a sim card to send out messages.

So why is this being done? To create a database so vast and so complete that it would be a hacker’s wet dream and terrorists and business corporates, underground organised criminals, and foreign government wanting a ringside view of another nation’s priorities would get their hands on it. How do we know it will not be hacked? We don’t. We truly have no idea.

And if we are to go along with this surrender in good faith, then the authorities have to do a much better job of convincing us. According to the report published by the Abraham’s Centre for Internet and Society, over 130 million Indians have had their Aadhaar details leaked from government websites and actually published. Even now, there is no ban on publicising Aadhaar details or publishing them. This is gift wrapped marketing for online sales in India and all over the world.

All this effort certainly warrants a debate on the efficacy of the contribution made to the nation’s safety, and also what safeguards are being placed to ensure that the fundamental right of privacy is not damaged.


Published Date: Oct 27, 2017 10:06 pm | Updated Date: Oct 27, 2017 10:06 pm