In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 29, 2017

12560 - Do not let Aadhaar rule our lives like Tolkien’s Ring -TNN Blog

December 24, 2017, 1:50 AM IST Abheek Barman in Folk Theorem | India | TOI

Like most men of his generation, John Ronald Reuel Tolkien, an orphan and scholar was sent to war on June 5, 1916. He was an officer, to command young men drawn from the working classes, of the “mining, milling and weaving areas of Lancashire.” He liked speaking to these lads, but was told that as an officer of the 11th (Service) Battalion of the Lancashire Fusiliers, he should not ‘fraternize’ with them, but goad them on to die.

And so it was. In the terrible fighting in Somme, in France, trench by stinking trench, infested with excrement, lice, worms and infection, Tolkien and his men prevailed. But most were struck down by disease or machine gunning. It is a miracle he survived, injured many times and finally shipped back to England.

Otherwise we would not have got to read The Hobbit and the majestic, three-volume The Lord of The Rings. These are parables of titanic struggles between forces of good and evil, but it is ultimately the literally small guy (a Hobbit) — Bilbo or Frodo Baggins — the miner and miller in the trenches, who beat all odds to prevail.

But there is a far more sinister aspect of these tales. It is the existence and cause of the mayhem: control of the ‘One Ring To Rule Them All.’ The One who wins and wears the Ring rules all.

That is reality today. We have a despicable Ring. It is called Aadhaar. It started off innocuously during the UPA regime but morphed into a monster from 2014. Today, it has two purposes — one, to enforce an all-encompassing surveillance state; two, to deny poor people of state-subsidized means of existence. It also threatens to block your investments, bank accounts and pension. Go figure.

In the first week of October, 11-year-old Santoshi Kumari died in Simdega, Jharkhand, after her family was repeatedly refused food by the local bania because nobody had Aadhaar biometrics.

I had the fortune to meet my former tutor at the Delhi School of Economics, Jean Dreze, who now lives and works in Ranchi, Jharkhand, a little more than a month later. Dreze has studied poverty more deeply than any other academic in the world, not by looking at abstract — and mostly sarkari-manufactured data — but by living among the poor. He still rides a bicycle to work, and as he says, he is still a jholawala, because he carries a jhola, with a laptop which has tonnes of incredible data. 

The Jholawala said two important things which I will rephrase.

One: Aadhaar is a dumb scheme because it assumes that poor receivers of subsidies are deceivers of taxpayer money from the system. Therefore Aadhaar, designed by people like Infosys’ Nandan Nilekani, who’ve never had anything to do with say, buying subsidized sugar, got it wrong.

The actual villains that dupe the subsidy system own the so-called ‘fair-price-outlets’ in every mohalla — typically the most powerful and wealthy banias. This is easy, if you control money as well as commodity supplies. Take near-zero-cost credit provided to supply subsidized rations to the poor from crony sarkari lenders, after paying a bribe. Next, use this to buy up commodities, warehouse them, create artificial shortages and price distortions. Tell the poor to eat grass or pay exorbitant rates. This is why India has rotting food mountains and Santoshi and thousands like her die of starvation. Aadhaar pins the poor, innocent and hungry with the responsibility to prove their poverty and hunger.

But for most of us, how does Aadhaar matter? This, as Dreze explained is simple. Once linked to systems like pensions, credit cards, financial instruments like mutual funds and bank accounts, it creates the scope of massive Big Brother scrutiny into your life — whether you buy a brassiere or a Bentley. Long ago, Thomas Hobbes called this the PanOpticon, the all-seeing eye into every life.

Two more things matter. One, even the best biometric system on earth is prone to error. Fingerprinting or retina scanning has an accuracy of less than 75% on average. But when you go to claim your pension or bank balance, any measure under 80% will deny you. This is not sci-fi, this is the truth.

Two, this Ring of control has been extended from cradle to crematorium. Children, even under the age of five, need this piece of rubbish to appear for exams or get a mid-day meal at a crèche. When we all, inevitably, will depart we need Aadhaar to prove us dead.

But the good news is this: all of this is likely illegal and obviously illogical. Each provision will be challenged in court and likely be struck down. The sooner Aadhaar is abolished, the better. Tolkien despised his responsibility of sending men to die. Which is why, finally, there was no Ring to rule over all.


DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.