In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

12485 - Fadnavis govt junks Aadhaar, dines with the devil (banks), gets loan waiver Assembly-ready, but crisis far from over - First Post


IndiaSanjay SawantDec, 10 2017 15:40:55 IST
Comment 2

On Thursday, 7 December 2017, the Maharashtra government announced that its marquee farm loan waiver scheme was well and truly underway. The late-evening press release put out two important figures to show substantial ground had been covered in implementing the scheme:
• The work of identifying beneficiaries for the waiver had gathered pace; out of 71.11 lakh applications, 41 lakh had been validated (green list). This was a near-impossible leap from just 69,832 green listed farmers just ten days earlier on 25 November.
• Rs 19,537 crore, that is, more than 80 percent of the Rs 24,000 crore estimated cost of the scheme, had already been released to the banks.

A day later, on 8 December, the government announced that across the state banks would work over the weekend to speed up disbursal to farmers.


Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis chairing a meeting with State Level Bankers Committee

These figures suggest that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis scripted the narrowest of escapes from a gathering political storm. It would have hit him with full force on 11 December in Nagpur where the state Assembly begins its winter session.

So how did he side-step the storm? Did the government suddenly discover its administrative mojo after weeks of running in the dark? Or was it a political sleight of hand, a mere passing of the buck to somebody else, the banks in this case?
The latest round of Firstpost investigations into the mess the loan waiver scheme has become suggests that it is all that and more. To fully understand how the government is trying to extricate itself from this mess, a bit of background is important.

Events of 7 December
Chief Minister Fadnavis chairs a meeting with the State Level Bankers Committee (SLBC, a working group of all banks), one of many in recent weeks. On the agenda is the status of loan waiver scheme. At Rs 34,022 crore (now revised to Rs 24,000 crore), it is the biggest loan waiver scheme by any state government. But what should have been one of the high points of his tenure had become a first-grade administrative nightmare thanks to the banks.

A few weeks ago, the banks had spoiled his dream of delivering a leakage-free Aadhaar-linked waiver scheme. They had turned in spurious lists of defaulters (beneficiaries of loan waiver) and brought the disbursal process to a complete standstill. The waiver process was to benefit 71.11 lakh debt-ridden farmers. The process was to begin on 18 October and end on 20 November. But as of 25 November, records accessed by Firstpost show, the government had cleared loans only to a tiny “green list” of 69,832 verified beneficiaries.

From ghost accounts to duplicate accounts to imaginary Aadhaar numbers to incorrect outstanding loan amounts, the lists were riddled with unthinkable errors in data-keeping that shake one’s faith in the banking system. It highlighted how casually the banks deal with public funds as explained in this Firstpost investigation.
This shoddy job by the banks has delayed the disbursals by nearly two months. Debt-ridden farmers are getting restive, opposition parties are smelling blood and various government departments are stressing about how to make sense of the rubbish that the SLBC had turned in in the name of a defaulters’ list.

But none of that stress shows up in the chief minister’s meeting with the SLBC, at least publicly. Instead, a chirpy statement is put out by the chief minister’s office saying he “thanked the banks for their contribution to the entire process” and appealed to them to improve their efforts to “rectify errors in the remaining applications in a time bound manner”.
Two important questions arise from the events of 7 December:
• Instead of roasting the banks for rank inefficiency and utter lack of due diligence—bordering on criminal negligence—why was the chief minister thanking the banks for their “contribution to the whole process”? After all, they had, by design or default, completely derailed his plans for a two-level, fool-proof beneficiary-verification process.
• How exactly did the government cover so much ground in ten days between 26 November and 6 December after being grid-locked and immobile for the 40 days prior?

The tell-all document

A closely-guarded document of the government accessed exclusively by Firstpost affords answers to both these questions. This is a document prepared by the Cooperation Department showing the status of the loan waiver scheme as of 2 December. It consists of two excel sheets, one for scheduled commercial banks (33) and one for district cooperative banks (30). Here is the document:
Loan waiver amount credited to beneficiaries accounts via commercial banks as on 2 December 2017