In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, January 8, 2018

12637 - 119,22,59,062 Aadhaar Numbers, 119,22,59,062 People’s Privacy At Stake - Logical Indian


January 5th, 2018

                        Image Credit: Newsclick

On January 3, an article published in The Tribune claimed that the media house gained unrestricted access to details for any of the more than 1 billion Aadhaar numbers created so far. It took The Tribune just Rs 500 and 10 minutes to purchase a username and a password from an ‘agent’ on Whatsapp, which was then used to gain personal information of practically anyone by simply entering their unique 12-digit identification number.

After this report was published, the UIDAI called it ‘misreporting’ and assured (as it has several times in the past) that Aadhaar details are completely safe. When The Tribune responded by pointing out loopholes in the UIDAI’s claims, the government body Tweeted a reply saying, ‘some persons have misused demographic search facility, given to designated officials to help residents who have lost Aadhaar/Enrollment slip to retrieve their details.’ Basically, the UIDAI accepted the breach by not accepting the breach, and claimed that only our demographic information was misused, while our biometrics are safe. But, what UIDAI forgot to mention is that we choose the people we want to share our demographic details with. We do not go around telling everyone, ‘Hi, my name is X. My parents’ names are A and B. I was born in so and so year, my email address is x@gmail.com, my mobile number is 0123456789 and I live at myexactresidentialaddress.’
The BJP was quick to term The Tribune’s article ‘fake news’. Hours after the report, The Quint found that random people with no official credentials can access and become admins of the official Aadhaar database (with names, mobile numbers, addresses of every Indian linked to the UIDAI scheme). Not only this, but once you become an admin, you can make anyone you choose an admin. Anyone means literally anyone – even a foreign national, and that too for no charge. The personal information of 119,22,59,062 Indians is up for sale for free.
More often than not, it is the Aadhaar enrolment agents who can be traced back to such breaches. UIDAI had received repeated complaints of enrolment agencies registering fake data but took no action.
BuzzFeed News also did its own research and discovered that the man who provided The Tribune access to Aadhaar database, had paid Rs 6,000 to an anonymous person in a Whatsapp group he was a part of to get a username and password for himself. He claimed to be unaware that he was compromising people’s privacy and said that he was selling usernames and passwords for Rs 500 to get back the Rs 6,000 he had spent.
As Meghnad Bose pointed out in this article, even relatively unimportant systems have access control via a 2 or 3-stage process that includes OTPs, biometric checks, etc. With the advancement of technology, even our phones do not unlock without our fingerprints, or sometimes, a retina scan. You cannot order food on Swiggy or hail an Uber cab if you don’t first register for the applications using an OTP.

Why is gaining access to Aadhaar database a child’s play?
Isn’t the government concerned that its citizens information might be misused by unauthorised agents? It used to, when the UPA government was in power.


On Aadhaar, neither the Team that I met nor PM could answer my Qs on security threat it can pose. There is no vision, only political gimmick
Now, the same concerns are reiterated by the Congress

‘AADHAR’ data breached yet again!

As every citizen’s personal information is exposed to hackers everyday & ‘Right to Privacy’ is mocked and flouted with impunity, Modi Govt remains immune.

Is anyone listening?

The number of Aadhaar breaches in the past, cases of duplicate Aadhaar cards, entire villages having the same Aadhaar number, more number of unique identification numbers issued than a state’s population (for eg, New Delhi has 17.7 million population but 19.2 million Aadhaar cards have been issued to the capital), etc are not unknown to us. We’re are so tired of hearing the concerns with Aadhaar that its benefits are blurred. Whatever be the case, privacy is not an area where the government or citizens can compromise (however ingenious or advantegrous an idea maybe).


Why should we care?
In this article, we will not delve into the manifold issues with Aadhaar (for instance, the government’s failure to make ration and social welfare readily available to the poor) but only talk about its privacy concerns and how they affect each and every one of us.

With India not having a data protection law at a time when data is the new oil, Aadhaar raises even more eyebrows.
It is already established that getting access to Aadhaar database is easy-peasy. One might think that this breach was by unscrupulous agents but the Aadhaar Act permits the government itself to sell your information, except for your core biometric data, to a “requesting agency” (any agency or person who is willing to pay the fees).  
For those sighing with relief thinking that only their demographic information is at stake – your bodily information is not secure either. There have been past cases of hacking the biometric security settings of UIDAI.
Also, our biometrics are not unique. Meaning, they might change with age or certain disabilities. The Aadhaar Act itself states that citizens are mandated to inform the Authority of such changes, overthrowing UIDAI’s claims that Aadhaar enrolment is a ‘one-time’ affair. Even more atrocious is the Act disallowing an individual access to her own biometrics. You can never know if your bodily information is correctly recorded, leaving room for the possibility of copying or replacing your identity with someone else’s. This was found in the breach by Axis Bank Ltd, Mumbai-based Suvidhaa Infoserve, and Bengaluru-based eMudhra, where multiple transactions were done with the same fingerprint.

But unreliability of biometrics and repeated breaches of confidentiality are only the tip of the iceberg.

Aadhaar might kill the very essence of democracy
Did you know state surveillance of citizens’ private communications is authorised by legislative enactments such as the Indian Telegraph Act and the Information Technology Act?
Aadhaar only acts as a catalyst for mass surveillance under the blanket of ‘national security’.
Surveillance in the 21st century is not limited to wiretapping phones; Aadhaar is capable of more, much more than even giants like Facebook or Google.
Have you ever noticed when you walk and look up at the moon, it is always staring down on you? Even when you start running, the moon matches your pace, always hovering over your head. Aadhaar is like the moon. Only, it is actually following you and this is no visual gimmick. This is called ‘live-tapping’. It means that Aadhaar gives the government the ability to collect and store massive amounts of information on our locations, movements, activities, thoughts and wishes. Basically, the government has mapped the habits of the entire population.
The most common citizen argument against mass surveillance is – ‘if I am not doing anything wrong why should I care if the government is watching my every move?’ Well, for the same reason you have a password on your phone and Gmail account or curtains on your windows.
The next phase of live-tapping is ‘data-mining’ – meaning, when our habits are recognised, our desires can be predicted. Corporations use this in advertising, while governments use this to eliminate political disagreements thus, killing the very essence of democracy. A government thrives on the opinion of the majority, and what could be better than knowing voters’ behavioural pattern and swaying them into eco-chambers? This is the power of data.
The deadline to link Aadhaar with all schemes has been extended to March 31, 2018. Sounds goods as it gives us more time to (not) get an Aadhaar card and (not) link it with everything.
No. Not really.
The catch is that it is still mandatory to provide Aadhaar application reference numbers when we open new bank accounts. And application numbers are not allotted without going through the Aadhaar enrolment process, i.e., by submitting all your biometric data and demographic information.
In conclusion, the debate on Aadhaar is still greatly against us and while hoping that the Supreme Court comes up with a favourable decision, we should speak out more. We need to start a discourse on Aadhaar’s privacy concerns, educating and spreading awareness anywhere and everywhere thus, urging the top court to take a decision that benefits us.