In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

13032 - Do the current fintech companies in India have good enough data security? - Live Mint


Adoption of digital services is growing even as many consumers are unaware of the risks. Experts say much more needs to be done, and that customers too have to do their bit
Last Published: Mon, Mar 19 2018. 01 13 AM IST

Clockwise from top: Tanuj Bhojwani, Sanjay Katkar, Murari Sridharan and Amit Jaju

The spread of digital services is widening but consumers are not fully aware of the associated risks. Some experts talk about where Indian fintech stands on consumer data security and privacy

Tanuj Bhojwani, venture capitalist, Bharat Innovation Fund, and core volunteer, iSpirt

There are many types of fintechs at different levels of maturity, and their security practices vary. Currently, we depend on these companies’ fear of reputation loss, and in some cases, threat of regulations, to keep our data safe. But all of these measures are equivalent to a slap on the wrist. We must first push for a data protection law that gives us the freedom to transact with our data and holds corporations responsible for harms coming from bad security. Consumers should worry, but not to the point of paranoia. The current narrative around security has become prime-time ‘breaking news’ and we know how issues are treated there. Follow best practices to keep online identities and data safe. Use a password manager to generate and store passwords. It helps create stronger passwords. Don’t give more permissions or information (to apps or websites) than needed. Hackers can create near-identical copies of popular websites. Look for trusted sites That show a green lock icon on web browsers.

Sanjay Katkar, joint MD and CTO, Quick Heal Technologies Ltd
The financial industry stores sensitive consumer data which attracts cybercriminals. Fintech is a relatively new space and data security is still at a nascent stage. There is a significant lack of resources to address data protection. Also, the BYOD (bring your own device) policy, which allows employees to use their personal devices at work, raises several questions about data security.

Fintech firms need to enforce security in development lifecycle at the design and architecture stage by identifying various threat models and ensuring enough mechanism to mitigate them. They must have a robust data security policy in place which outlines the procedure and designates responsibilities for ensuring complete privacy of consumer information. This should include strong password policy, investment in the right IT security solutions like endpoint security, data loss prevention (DLP) and encryption, regular data backups, employee awareness programmes, and a comprehensive action plan to counteract data breach incidents. On the regulatory front, the government should work on a strong data protection framework similar to Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which comes into effect in May 2018. The regulation carries provisions that require businesses to protect their customers’ data and privacy. Consumers should stay alert and start treating their data security as a necessity and not as an afterthought.

Murari Sridharan, chief technology officer, BankBazaar.com
Whether you are a company or a an individual consumer, you should assume that your data is at risk and take appropriate precautions. The challenge isn’t insurmountable if you go back to the basics.

Companies should have a clear, well-documented information security policy, and a process to go along with it. They should conduct periodic internal and external audits. There are several forms of defence. Data analytics can be handy as one can look for odd patterns while mining data.
Once vulnerability or a process gap is found, the issue must be immediately fixed. A well-documented and implemented partner, vendor, employee on-boarding and exit process is also a must.
For a customer, it is imperative to create backups for personal data. They should educate themselves about the apps, products, and companies they use and make sure that the recommended privacy settings are in place. They should demand data safety. In an increasingly all-digital world, being well informed about data protection and user rights is necessary.

We are at an interesting juncture. As India frames its data protection laws, all stakeholders must come together to create an ecosystem where the customer is at the centre and in charge of her data and the companies provide value added services in exchange for that customer data, which is held in accordance with all the data protection practices.
Amit Jaju, partner and head of forensic technology, EY India
Demonetization and Aadhaar-based eKYC have fuelled rapid adoption of fintech solutions and services. This has brought about immense pressure on fintech companies to not only manage huge volumes but also to protect themselves and customers from cyber risks. They have invested significantly in protection from cyber security risks, but such risks continue to evolve. The present environment requires fintech companies to interact and exchange information with external parties in realtime. This makes it difficult to detect and respond to risks that may originate from authorised channels and third-parties involved in the facilitation of transactions. Further, services are offered to customers over mobile and computers, which are traditionally less secure, though mobile phones offer security solutions such as biometric authentication. Phishing, malware, social engineering and unauthorized device access continue to be the top risks for fintech channels. These risks can be reduced by improving the design and security aspects at technology level but 100% effectiveness cannot be achieved unless customers know the dos and don’ts. Presently, the focus is to push for KYC and Aadhaar linking of accounts, and this may in some cases push additional cybersecurity initiatives to a lower priority. Customers must read the guidance provided and follow basic security hygiene.

First Published: Sun, Mar 18 2018. 11 59 PM IST