In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, April 2, 2018

13168 - How safe is your Aadhaar data? - DECCAN CHRONICLE.

Published
Apr 1, 2018, 6:27 am IST
Updated
Apr 1, 2018, 6:27 am IST


Fingerprints should never be saved on local computers, says cyber expert.

Prasanna

Chennai :The state governments vested with the role of collecting personal details from public for Aadhaar purpose had failed to understand the seriousness of data leak and most of the outsourced portals and websites that deal with Aadhaar, lack adequate cyber security measures, making Aadhaar data vulnerable for the data breach, opines J. Prasanna, cyber security expert, cyber security and foundation Pte Ltd. In an interview with DC, Prasanna explains that the breach is not in the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), but the state governments, which execute the project had messed it up.

Elliot Alderson kicked up a storm across the country when he leaked details of close to 20,000 Aadhaar cards on the Internet and shared samples of fingerprint data on his handle. How can the state government be held responsible for this?

On an Aadhaar system where you can do fingerprint authentication, the print should not be saved on the local computer, but directly transmitted. Digital fingerprint would normally be 8 bit to 128 bit digital signature. So, when you put a fingerprint, it converts into a string (it will be 8 bit or 128 bit), which is transmitted at the backend and the hashes of the two strings are compared. The fingerprint is never sent to the back end system. That is the normal security process. What the guys collecting have been doing is that, they are actually storing the fingerprint themselves. In a credit card system, every payment gateway does not store credit card number. Same way they should not store fingerprint locally. They should directly transmit it and authenticate it with Aadhaar system.

Can you give an example about the involvement of third party websites of the state government, which is eventually messing up the system?
In every Aadhaar, there is be a string at the bottom saying       "Mera Aadhar Mera Pehchaan". Do a google search for this string with the file type PDF. You will get hundreds of results in government sites and various forums. Some of them have been recently taken off after leaks from Elliot.  Yet, few government sites still have this broken authentication, where they upload all these Aadhaar card insights without securing the directory. That means you go and visit the URL, download the files to get access to actual Aadhaar cards. Ofcourse, the biometric is not there. But, Aadhaar is enough to do crazy stuff. One can reprint another Aadhaar card, change the picture and appear anywhere.

How is Tamil Nadu in terms of cyber security of Aadhar?
In Tamil Nadu, still there has not been much breach, which has been reported. It was reported mainly in Andhra and Maharashtra. But, the government must take precautionary measures. Currently they are only focusing on the benefits of Aadhaar and not cyber security where they are falling short.

What needs to be done?
UIDAI should start with using the web to find data breaches on third party websites. Identify and go behind all the third party service providers and state governments to fix vulnerabilities on cyber security front. Also, any portal that works with UIDAI should be subjected to cyber security vulnerability assessment to find the vulnerability before they can actually allow them to connect to their system. Stringent laws should be applied even on governments, which are not taking personal ID or Aadhaar act more seriously.

For this, do we have enough cyber security personnel?
No. Most of them claim to be cyber security personnel, but there is not enough skill for the job. The government must start recruiting white hat hackers who can actually work with security team or application development team to give them insights on how to build security.