- Shweta Ganjoo
- New Delhi
- August 6, 2018
- UPDATED: August 6, 2018 20:46 IST
- Follow @shweta_ganjoo
Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Thursday, August 9, 2018
13844 - Hacker claims he can crack eAadhaar password in under 3 seconds - India Today
13840 - Aadhaar helpline in Android phones: From Google’s apology to UIDAI’s assurance in 10 points - Live Mint
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
13685 - Aadhaar Critics are not Ludites - National Herald
Aadhaar critics are not luddites
VIDYUT GORE

Photo courtesy: Twitter/@ceo_uidai
File photo of UIDAI chief Ajay Bhushan Pandey
UIDAI chief writes that the fear of a threat to privacy because of the use of core biometrics in Aadhaar is exaggerated because biometrics are not secret information like PIN or password
The CEO of UIDAI, Ajay Bhushan Pandey, has written yet another opinion piece in a newspaper, which bravely argues against established tech security practices.
While Aadhaar FAIL generally tends to ignore individuals and their opinions, it is important to examine the claim and competence of a highly placed public servant, who arguably occupies one of the most important positions related to technology in India.
The UIDAI chief writes that the fear of a threat to privacy because of the use of core biometrics (fingerprints and iris) in Aadhaar is exaggerated because biometrics are not secret information like PIN or password. People, he went on to add, must know that even the theft of biometrics in a rare eventuality will not put one to the same level of risk as the leakage of a password.
A threat to privacy, however, is not about whether the information is secret or not. It is about having the choice of what information we grant and to whom. The residents of India are not criminals that their rights must be waived away and they be compelled to grant access to their biometrics, and that too, to an insecure system, because of a system whose compliance with the Constitution of the country itself has been questioned.
This, in fact, has been repeatedly brought up by the judges in the Supreme Court itself, and Pandey had the opportunity of being the only non-lawyer allowed to present his perspective directly to the judges themselves. The judges did not appear convinced and continued to see the invasion of privacy as an important issue left unanswered.
Perhaps Pandey means to call the judges Luddites as well? A Luddite, for those unaware of the term, is a person who is opposed to technological developments. Dr. Pandey calling those who oppose Aadhaar Luddites betrays knowledge of the meaning of the term, because the technological criticism of Aadhaar has been actually backed by technologically sound arguments and evidence. In contrast, the bombast of the "Aadhaar mafia" as the proponents of Aadhaar are increasingly being referred to, due to ongoing unethical practices, are yet to present any factual rebuttal.
It is worthwhile to take note of some of the Luddites, as Dr Pandey would prefer to call them, who have been critical of Aadhaar. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy, retired judge of the Karnataka High Court and the original petitioner in the landmark ‘privacy case’ is one.
It is an irony that while critics of Aadhaar seem to have impeccable technological credentials while the UIDAI chief, who has the gumption to call these critics Luddites, himself doesn’t seem to understand the difference between private information and secret keys despite repeated explanations
Vicram Crishna, one of the two Indians to help develop software to enable Stephen Hawkins to ‘talk’through his wheelchair, J.T. D’Souza, biometrics expert, Troy Hunt, a web security professional and regional director for Microsoft in Australia, French cyber security researcher Baptiste Robert who tweets as Elliot Alderson and Anupam Saraph, a respected inventor and advisor on governance, informatics and strategic planning are also among those who have publicly expressed their concern about Aadhaar.
Alderson in fact has compared unfavourably Aadhaar’s approach to security as a ‘school level project’. Mozilla, the organisation behind the Firefox browser, has come out publicly in criticism of Aadhaar. And in case more critics are to be named, one can cite the names of legal scholar Shamnad Basheer, Linux consultant Anivar Arvind and Samir Kelekar, who has a PhD in computer networking and holds three patents related to mobile security.
It is an irony that while critics of Aadhaar seem to have impeccable technological credentials while the UIDAI chief, who has the gumption to call these critics Luddites, himself doesn’t seem to understand the difference between private information and secret keys despite repeated explanations.
For his benefit, let me repeat the explanation. When you use a key to control access or authorisation, that key must be secret and not merely private. Just like guessing where you were on Saturday night or knowing the name of the street your home is on should not allow people to create a bank account in your name, lifting fingerprints off your glass of water shouldn't allow them to create a bank account and launder money in your name either.
A secret key must be one that is known only to the person who is the rightful owner of that access. In the event of a breach, it must be readily revoked and replaced. It must be unique. Just like you don't use the same password for your Twitter and netbanking, you should not use the same fingerprints for your PDS and money transfers either.
This is not very difficult to understand. If Dr. Pandey is not able to understand it with so many explanations provided repeatedly over years, perhaps he should undertake correcting the deficiencies first before holding a technology related job.
Till date there hasn't been a shred of factual explanation for why the criticism of Aadhaar is incorrect, while there have been various face saving measures because the UIDAI has no answers for valid criticism. Like the farce of "Virtual ID" to protect privacy after Aadhaar data has already been proliferated with little caution. If he has any factual explanation to show how Aadhaar does not violate privacy, he should not have kept it a secret from the Supreme Court.
While he is at it, Dr. Pandey should also name one private corporation that would pay the kind of money Aadhaar has cost the country for the quality of work on display. One corporation that deals with sensitive identity information or access to financial transactions that would be willing to risk access being protected by something as flimsy, as unrevokable, easily leaked, private information.
When public funds are used to subvert public interest, criticism is inevitable. Calling critics names cannot stop it.
Sorry, sir. "Fikar not, all is well" does not quite answer the mounting criticism.
Click here to subscribe to National Herald on WhatsApp & Facebook
Thursday, May 10, 2018
13497 - Elliot Alderson: Saying Aadhaar Is Un-Hackable Does Not Make It So - Mid Day
Has anything changed since? "Things have not really changed," said Baptiste, adding, "I declined all interviews after the appearance on French TV, and worked on non-India related topics. There are some people who recognize me at local conferences but abroad I'm mostly still anonymous." And how did people react to his picture?: "As far as I saw, reactions were quite good. People were curious to see a real picture of me."
Baptiste is not all about exposes and ethical hacking. When he's not doing any of those, he is busy building apps and services, running and being with his family. "I try to be a good father and a good husband. I run a lot as well. Last year, I ran a marathon and I will run a half-marathon at the end of the month."
Monday, May 7, 2018
13469 - How long can its captain – UIDAI – continue to deny the Aadhaar leaks? - News Click
Monday, April 2, 2018
13168 - How safe is your Aadhaar data? - DECCAN CHRONICLE.
On an Aadhaar system where you can do fingerprint authentication, the print should not be saved on the local computer, but directly transmitted. Digital fingerprint would normally be 8 bit to 128 bit digital signature. So, when you put a fingerprint, it converts into a string (it will be 8 bit or 128 bit), which is transmitted at the backend and the hashes of the two strings are compared. The fingerprint is never sent to the back end system. That is the normal security process. What the guys collecting have been doing is that, they are actually storing the fingerprint themselves. In a credit card system, every payment gateway does not store credit card number. Same way they should not store fingerprint locally. They should directly transmit it and authenticate it with Aadhaar system.
In every Aadhaar, there is be a string at the bottom saying "Mera Aadhar Mera Pehchaan". Do a google search for this string with the file type PDF. You will get hundreds of results in government sites and various forums. Some of them have been recently taken off after leaks from Elliot. Yet, few government sites still have this broken authentication, where they upload all these Aadhaar card insights without securing the directory. That means you go and visit the URL, download the files to get access to actual Aadhaar cards. Ofcourse, the biometric is not there. But, Aadhaar is enough to do crazy stuff. One can reprint another Aadhaar card, change the picture and appear anywhere.
In Tamil Nadu, still there has not been much breach, which has been reported. It was reported mainly in Andhra and Maharashtra. But, the government must take precautionary measures. Currently they are only focusing on the benefits of Aadhaar and not cyber security where they are falling short.
UIDAI should start with using the web to find data breaches on third party websites. Identify and go behind all the third party service providers and state governments to fix vulnerabilities on cyber security front. Also, any portal that works with UIDAI should be subjected to cyber security vulnerability assessment to find the vulnerability before they can actually allow them to connect to their system. Stringent laws should be applied even on governments, which are not taking personal ID or Aadhaar act more seriously.
No. Most of them claim to be cyber security personnel, but there is not enough skill for the job. The government must start recruiting white hat hackers who can actually work with security team or application development team to give them insights on how to build security.
Thursday, March 29, 2018
13134 - Who is 'ethical hacker' Elliot Alderson? Aadhaar whistleblower says he's 'not Indian' - Money Control
Note: All the cards must be available publicly
For this attack, the attacker need a physical access to the phone, rooted phone is not needed and yes this is the latest version of the app.
cc @uidai @ceo_uidai
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
13111 - ModiApp Leaks - The Lid Finally Lifts! No place to hide
Monday, March 26, 2018
13103 - Modi app leaks data? More privacy scare after Cambridge Analytica, Aadhaar - Business Standard
- ALSO READ
Cambridge Analytica: Cong likens Ravi Shankar Prasad to Goebbels; 10 points -
Identity theft is the biggest threat from Aadhaar, says Robert Baptiste
Govt's Umang app finally sees the light of the day: All you need to know
Pardada, not nana: Narendra Modi's remark on Rahul Gandhi's grandfather
Rahul Gandhi Cong's new prez, says BJP crushes voices: Top 10 developments
Ps. Thanks mainstream media, you're doing a great job of burying this critical story, as always.
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
13042 - Know the man behind Elliot Alderson, who exposed flaws in Aadhaar, OnePlus & Paytm - Hindustan Times
|
|
Kul Bhushan
Hindustan Times
|
I quickly check your #android app on the #playstore and you have some security issues...It's super easy to get the password of the local database for example...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|




