In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label Soma sekar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soma sekar. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

5367 - Court-monitored probe sought into DBT of LPG subsidies - Deccan herald


Akram Mohammed, Mysore, March 25, 2014, DHNS:


Aadhaar enrolment to continue in the state, UIDAI sources

Consumer rights activists have sought a court-monitored investigation into the amount of pilferages that have occurred when the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) of LPG subsidies was in place in various parts of the country.

This follows the order of the Supreme Court to withdraw notifications, which had made Aadhaar card mandatory to avail benefits, under social welfare and other schemes.

Speaking to Deccan Herald, V L Somashekar of Grahaka Shakthi said, the Aadhaar-based DBT was imposed on the people, without proper research on its effects on the people. 

Sunday, February 10, 2013

3009 - High court orders notice to planningcommission, UIDAI chairperson



TNN | Feb 9, 2013, 07.21 AM IST


BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court on Friday admitted a regular first appeal (RFA) on the Aadhaar issue. The petition is against the dismissal of a suit by a city civil court in Bangalore wherein Aadhaar, the mega UID project of the central government, was sought to be declared as illegal.

Justice Jawad Rahim admitted the RFA filed by VK Somashekar, a social activist, and ordered notice to the chairperson of Unique Identification Authority of India ( UIDAI) and the chairperson of the Planning Commission of India in addition to Mathew Thomas, a missile scientist and a co-plaintiff in the suit.

The appellant has challenged the July 3, 2012 verdict of the XVI additional city civil and sessions court dismissing their suit by imposing a cost of Rs 25,000 each.

On July 3, the lower court had dismissed the plea terming it as not maintainable and asked the plaintiffs to pay the cost to the central government.

"Aadhaar is essential to Indian citizens for their welfare and also for security reasons in order to safeguard our citizens from terrorists and for identifying terrorists. Further, it is not compulsory. The government of India and government of Karnataka are there to look after the genuine utilization of the tax money for the welfare of the society," the civil court had observed in its judgment.

The plaintiffs have contended that the scheme was designed for the benefit of a few private companies and without any serious study. "There are complaints of large-scale violations. Aadhaar scheme has been illegally designed without any semblance of a statutory right,'' the petitioners had claimed.

Monday, January 28, 2013

2818 - Brokers make Rs 500 on ‘free’ Aadhaar cards



Aadhaar enrolment centres across the city are ruled by brokers while officials of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and the civil supplies department remain mute spectators. In spite of the process of securing the Aadhaar card being free, the middlemen collect up to `500 for each enrolment and promise applicants that they would get their cards at the earliest. With the Centre deciding to extend the Aadhaar-based direct cash transfer scheme to beneficiaries from January 1, the demand for Aadhaar cards has increased exponentially and the brokers are taking full advantage. The pilot programme will be implemented in five districts in Andhra Pradesh from January 1: Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, East Godavari, Anantapur and Chittoor. Sources alleged a nexus between brokers and staff at Aadhaar centres. Though application forms are supposed to be provided free of cost, applicants are forced to pay up to `100 for them. The situation has become so bad, say sources, that brokers are seeking “bulk orders” from people in apartments and residential colonies by promising them to get the Aadhaar cards issued within days. People complain that the staff at Aadhaar enrolment centres also encourage the applicants to approach brokers by rejecting their enrolment citing one reason or the other. The UIDAI has appointed several agencies to take up Aadhaar enrolment and lower-rung staffers at these centres are being lured by brokers who offer attractive commissions on each enrolment made by them. “When I went to the Aadhaar enrolment centre in Kapra, I was denied enrolment citing lack of proper address proof. When I approached them through a broker by paying `500, my job was done easily,” said Mr P. Somashekar, a resident of Kapra. Brokers at Barkatpura, Tarnaka, Ramanthapur, Panjagutta are meanwhile taking “bulk orders” from local residents to get Aadhaar cards issued by collecting `300 per enrolment if they approach them in blocks.

2816 - Left, civil society slam cash transfer



New Delhi, Nov 28, 2012, DHNS:
Say it is a bid to lure voters, cut subsidies

The Left and civil society are up in the arms against Aadhar-based direct cash transfer scheme, arguing that it was aimed at luring voters with an eye on the 2014 elections.

 A day after the announcement of the details, the CPM, civil society organisations including the one led by Aruna Roy and Medha Patkar and newly formed Aam Aadmi Party, all have expressed strong opposition to the scheme. 

The CPM described it as  the government’s ''obsessive'' commitment to cut subsidies.
“The direct cash transfer scheme, described by the Congress as a ‘game changer’ is indeed a game changer whose rules are weighed against the poor, in favour of the UPA-2 government’s obsessive commitment to cut subsidies to the working people,” said the CPM Politburo.

''The CPM strongly opposes such a policy shift away from provision of foodgrain, kerosene, fertilizers etc instead of providing for a universal PDS at controlled prices,” says the statement.

 The party has also objected to pushing through such changes without any debate on proposed bill on UID (Unique Identification). Arvind Kejriwal termed it a bribe to voters.

Activists gathered at Jantar Mantar at New Delhi for ‘People’s Assembly’ under the leadership of Aruna Roy, Medha Patkar,  Baba Adhav and Annie Raja, turned the assembly a venue for opposition to the scheme.

“This is being done at the behest of the World Bank and the forces, which are for globalisation of Indian economy,” asserted Patkar. Aruna Roy questioned the logic of trying to reduce corruption through the use of technology.

“The system of disbursing wages through post offices and bank accounts could not stop corruption in MGNREGS. Now, they will have our name and identity in their database, they can erase whenever they like,” she said. 

Subhash Lomte, leader of unorganized labour from Maharashtra, said the scheme would result in increased hardship for  unorganised workers. “The government will give cash based on the price fixed by it, but the market price would not be the same,” he said.

UID under severe attack

The announcement of direct cash transfer scheme has initiated a renewed attack on UID and Nandan Nilekani, the chief of UID Authority of India.

The Citizen’s Forum of Civil Liberties, which has been in the forefront of opposing UID, was relentlessly critical of Nilekani.

“The government, after pushing FDI, is in a hurry to offer this to foreign companies as a sop for investment,” said noted consumer activist V K Somasekhar. He accused the UIDAI chief of pursuing interests of foreign companies.

Somashekhar quoted from the speeches of Nilekani and the chief of Nielson India at a conference organised by the marketing research company in December 2010 and alleged that Nilekani assured them a market place through UID. The chief of Nielson India has been quoted saying that UID will help in “understanding the habits, needs and desires of consumers on a national scale.” Mathew Thomas of Fifth State raised security concerns, “one of UIDAI contractors provides intelligence services to the US government and another one was prosecuted in US for false claims and kickbacks.”

Saturday, January 26, 2013

2808 - INVITATION to PRESS RELEASE – MONOGRAPH on UID


INVITATION to PRESS RELEASE – MONOGRAPH on UID


You are most cordially invited to a meeting sponsored by ‘Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties’, ‘Grahak Shakti’, ‘The Fifth estate Trust’ and ‘Youth Against Corruption’ to release a Monograph on UID at 2 PM at Indian Women’s Press Corps premises – 5, Windsor Place, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001.

We believe that the people of this country should know the truth about UID, masquerading under the brand name, “Aadhaar”. The deceit in promoting UID as a pro-poor initiative needs to be exposed.

The Monograph brings out startling revelations about UIDAI and its foreign contractors, which are hitherto hidden from, and hence unknown to, the people of India. Its purpose is to shine a torch into the dark secrets of the UID scheme, reveal facts so far hidden from the people, seek an investigation and call for an immediate halt to this nefarious scheme.

The issues raised in the Monograph are backed by solid documentary evidence. The evidence is made available in the Monograph. They are sufficient to warrant a further probe.

We hope that this would open the eyes of all nationalists, among elected representatives, government functionaries, media, politicians, political parties, civil activists and most importantly, all people who love their country.

Tea and snacks would be served.

For the sponsors



Gopal Krishna, Somasekhar, V.K, Mathew Thomas and Sunil Bansal

RSVP: +919818089660; +9194498366360; +919880000401

Thursday, March 22, 2012

2474 - “Say no to UID campaign” gathers 3.57 crore signatures - Money Life



March 21, 2012 04:49 PM
Moneylife Digital Team


Despite the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance and other civil society groups coming out against the UID scheme, the government is yet to act on the opposition to the scheme from various quarters

Two days before the Union Budget, 2012-13, a truckload of signatures arrived in New Delhi. Collected by the Socialist Unity Centre of India (SUCI), these 3.57 crore signatures were in support of a campaign named “Say no to UID”. Yet, what can possibly be the biggest signature campaign largely went unreported.

On 14th March, a rally led by SUCI met prime minister Manmohan Singh. The truckload of signatures for the petition demanding the scrapping of UID and some other biometric data-collection schemes have been pictured. A delegation, headed by SUCI member Tarun Mandal, also met the prime minister to discuss their demands. Mr Mandal could not be contacted, as he is abroad. Though the SUCI rally was covered by some newspapers, they appeared oblivious to the presence of the truck that carried the 3.57 crore signatures.


The “Say no to UID” campaign is being supported by various civil society organisations and citizens groups. Gopal Krishna, spokesperson of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), New Delhi says, “The petition was submitted to the PM on 14th March. Independent organisations across India are supporting the move. We want the government to scrap the UID Aadhaar scheme immediately.”


A press release dated 16th March, sent out by the consortium of the civil society groups, cites the report on The National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill, 2010, by the Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Finance, 2011-12. The PSC report, dated December 2011, had damned the UID scheme, and came down heavily on the Executive for infringing on legislative powers. The press release says, “The Union Budget allocation of Rs14,232 crore for Aadhar-UID demonstrates a contempt of Parliament as it seems to ignore the recommendations of the report of PSC on Finance on the NIDAI Bill, 2010.” The groups have also criticised the National Population Register (NPR), another project that requires biometric enrolments of all citizens.

The PSC report had stated, “Considering the contradictions and ambiguities within the government on its implementation as well as implications, the committee categorically convey their unacceptability of the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010, in its present form. The committee would, thus, urge the government to reconsider and review the UID scheme as also the proposals contained in the Bill in all its ramifications and bring forth a fresh legislation before Parliament.”


The PSC had said, “The collection of biometric information and its linkage with personal information without amendment to the Citizenship Act, 1955, as well as the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, appears to be beyond the scope of subordinate legislation, which needs to be examined in detail by Parliament.”

Kamayani Bali Mahabal, eminent social activist and human rights lawyer, said that the increased allocation for UID amounts to a contempt of the Parliament. Col Mathew Thomas, a former defence services officer and missile scientist turned civic activist and Somasekhar VK, founder patron of Coordinated Action of Consumer & Voluntary Organizations of Karnataka have challenged the UID Aadhaar scheme in a representative suit in a civil court in Bangalore. Mr 

Somasekhar has extensively campaigned against this issue, and he says, “Most of the people after attending our programmes ask us about the procedure to withdraw from the Aadhar registration and many of them are writing to the respective agencies to withdraw and cancel their applications. This will further complicate the process and we have to see how they go about it.” Col Matthew says that mentioning the 3.57 crore signatures against UID will strengthen their case.



Sunday, September 18, 2011

1602 - Benefits of UID questioned - The Hindu

BANGALORE, September 17, 2011

Making a point: (From left) Public Relations Officer, e-governance, T. Prabhakar; UIDAI Regional Deputy Director Ashok Dalwai; Managing Trustee of Grahak Shakti Somashekar V.K.; and civic activist Mathew Thomas at a panel discussion in Bangalore on Friday. — photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy

Unease, uncertainty and even anger were at display by the critics of the Unique Identity Card (UID), also called “Aadhaar”, at a debate on the pros and cons of the project here on Friday.

Somashekar V.K., managing trustee of a citizen's awareness group, Grahak Shakti, called the UID an unnecessary expenditure with no tangible benefits. “For a project of such a magnitude, they have neither conducted a feasibility report nor a detailed project report,” he said and alleged that the project was being carried out with some ulterior commercial interest in mind.

Mathew Thomas from Citizen's Action Forum reinforced Mr. Somashekar's point saying that the storing of the identity of crores of people in a database raised ethical and security questions.

To this, UID Authority of India (UIDAI) Regional Deputy Director Ashok Dalwai said, “The UID is an established, recognised card that can serve as an indisputable identity proof anywhere in the country.” Allaying fears of security implications, he said the system had layers of encryption preventing its access to unauthorised people.

Claiming that the social benefits of a universal identity system was immense, Mr. Dalwai said, “In the long-term, the card would reduce the number of bogus ration cards, and could even help in extending credit to the rural poor when they use their UID number for transactions.”

T. Prabhakar, Public Relations Officer, e-governance Department, Karnataka, spoke.

During the interaction session, many of those gathered at the Students' Christian Movement of India House off Mission Road, questioned the legality of the project which hadn't yet received Parliament's approval.

They also expressed concern about the possibility of misuse of the information in the database.