AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 12007 - Govt will decide if Aadhaar will be mandatory for flying after SC gives ruling

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 11, 2017

12007 - Govt will decide if Aadhaar will be mandatory for flying after SC gives ruling - Hindustan Times

Govt will decide if Aadhaar will be mandatory for flying after SC gives ruling

The government is pushing for wide use of the 12-digit Aadhaar number that critics and activists are opposing over fears of possible data breach and privacy concerns.

INDIA Updated: Sep 06, 2017 16:11 Ist

Suchetana Ray

Hindustan Times, New Delhi

A CISF security personnel check a passenger’s documents at the IGI Airport in New Delhi. (HT File Photo)

The government will wait for the Supreme Court’s ruling on Aadhaar to decide if the 12-digit biometric authentication can be made mandatory for flying in India.

The top court’s recent ruling making privacy a “guaranteed fundamental right” is likely to test the validity of Aadhaar, which the government has been pushing for wide use but opposed by critics and activists over fears of possible data breach and privacy concerns.

Officials said a pilot project is already under way in two airports to assess the viability and convenience of the project.

“The pilot projects are going on for sometime. Given that a Supreme Court bench will start hearing the challenges against Aadhaar from November, there is no point in notifying the rule immediately,” said a government official, who did not wish to be named.

Officials said mandating Aadhaar and biometric authentication will make it easier for airlines in resolving several security issues. Airlines will also be able to easily detect passengers in the no-fly list.

Some private airlines said Aadhaar could take care of several problems.

Aadhaar-PAN linking deadline extended till Dec 31 but legal challenges over privacy remain

Right to privacy a fundamental right: 7 Aadhaar controversies that raised concern

“Otherwise, scanning through millions of air travellers everyday makes it a tedious process for airlines. There could be so many people with the same name leading to confusion,” said a source in a private airline.

Availability of Aadhaar will also help airlines in curbing human trafficking.

“All identity proofs are allowed at airports from driving license to passport. Biometric authentication with the Aadhaar number will streamline the process of security checks,” the added.

But those who have legally challenged the government’s move to make Aadhaar a primary identity proof for Indians, are against the linking of number with air travel.

“This is a way for the government and tax authorities to track air travel by Indians. This a breach of privacy and if notified we will challenge it,” said an activist who is part of the group of petitioners against Aadhaar. He did not wish to be named.

“Seeding Aadhaar with air travel will lead to disruption and exclusion. We have seen this happen wherever biometric authentication has been made mandatory. Apart from the concerns of surveillance, it has also hampered the delivery of the service,” said Anjali Bhardwaj, co-Convenor of National Campaign for People’s Right to Information.