In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

12957 - View: Have no fear, Aadhaar is linked to logic - Economic Times

ET CONTRIBUTORS|
Feb 13, 2018, 06.49 AM IST

UIDAI has introduced Virtual IDs for those who do not like to share their Aadhaar number for authentication or linking.
By R S Sharma 

There has been an intense debate about the linking of Aadhaar with various artefacts like bank accounts, investment accounts and mobile numbers. Aadhaar-linking with ration cards, MNREGA, scholarships, LPG connections and other benefit delivery systems is already in place. 

Those opposing this linking cite privacy as their main argument. They assert that this will enable GoI to profile them and provide it with more information than what it should. Cleaning up of social benefit databases of duplicates and ghosts to reduce leakages was one reason to start the Unique Identification (ID) programme. 

The other was to provide inclusive and verifiable identification. The idea was that if unique IDs were created for people, this could be used to clean up other databases through 'seeding' of these unique IDs. 

The other ways to clean up these databases was to create an Aadhaar-like system at the back-end. The only way to ensure uniqueness with a very high degree of accuracy is to use technology. This would have meant duplication of an Aadhaar-like infrastructure and would have been expensive and unnecessary. So, the 'seeding' of Aadhaar numbers in these databases is the most efficient method. 

To associate any entry with a real person cannot be construed as violation of privacy. If you go to a bank to open an account and when they ask you to provide your Know Your Customer (KYC) details, you can't claim this violates your privacy. Banks also must ensure they are providing service to a real person. 

  • Once every database is linked to Aadhaar, UIDAI, goes one argument, will know all your details such as bank accounts and stock holdings. The UIDAI can then, allegedly, stop any of your services if it wishes. 

  • First, when you link any database to Aadhaar, the entity maintaining that database merely authenticates with UIDAI regarding the accuracy of your Aadhaar. Once you provide your Aadhaar details to a bank, the bank conducts a demographic authentication with UIDAI to ensure this number belongs only to you, after sending your name and other details to UIDAI and getting a yes or no response. 

  • Your bank account details aren't shared by your bank with UIDAI. UIDAI just authenticates and has no information relating to the purpose of authentication or details of transaction. So, the question of profiling or centralisation of information does not arise. 

  • The linking of the mobile is, however, a bit different. First, when you enrolled for Aadhaar, you may have given your mobile number and that number (or email ID or both) is retained with UIDAI to communicate with you through a one-time password (OTP). If you did not provide your mobile number and you link it subsequently, UIDAI keeps that mobile number on which you expect the OTP and information relating to your authentication transactions. 

  • Second, mobile-linking creates a situation where seeding of other documents becomes more robust. When you link your bank account, an OTP is sent by UIDAI to your mobile registered with your Aadhaar. Mobile linking also sends a digital KYC to your telecom service provider to replace your KYC papers with the digital KYC (eKYC). This is digitising the telecom customer database. It also eliminates ghosts from the telecom subscriber database. 

  • Finally, there's the issue of aggregation of information using your Aadhaar number. First, this would require the aggregating entity to have access to all the databases where you figure. If that entity has legitimate access, it can get the aggregated information using your name or mobile number, even without Aadhaar. 

  • But aggregation is done only of publicly available information. A Google search does not throw up your bank account details if these aren't publicly available. But if you or any other entity proactively publish your bank account details, then this information will be caught by the search engines and will come up. So, linking your Aadhaar number doesn't make things easier for any entity to get information about you than what it is now. 

  • UIDAI has introduced Virtual IDs for those who do not like to share their Aadhaar number for authentication or linking. Further, tokenisation will ensure that various entities don't have access to your Aadhaar number while verifying your identity with UIDAI. 

  • Aadhaar-linking doesn't violate privacy of individuals. So why some people oppose this move is quite unclear. 


(The writer is chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India)