In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

12897 - When red tape creates hunger: How Aadhaar-linking is denying food to people in K'taka - New Minute.com

Aadhaar

Hundreds of people in Karnataka have been denied ration for a variety of reasons that ultimately boils down to the lack of an Aadhaar link.

Munirajappa and Manjula at their home in Kavalaganahalli, Chikkaballapur

In Kavalaganahalli, an idyllic village set amidst rock formations of various shapes and sizes 4 kilometres away from Chintamani in Chikballapur district of Karnataka, the sun is scorching over Munirajappa's ramshackled house.

Standing at the threshold of his house, Munirajappa enquires with his wife who hobbles to his side on one foot, asking who has come to meet them. Munirajappa is visually impaired while his wife lost one of her legs in an accident few years ago.

It has been years since Munirajappa last received ration. He stopped receiving ration as he had not linked his Aadhaar card to his ration card and in spite of repeated attempts to make an Aadhaar card, he was unsuccessful as officials could not record his biometric data.

“The idea here is 'Give Aadhaar or you don’t get ration',” says Shashiraj, an activist from Chintamani who has led several struggles against denial of essential services due to lack of an Aadhaar link.

Shashiraj estimates that there are hundreds like Munirajappa who have been denied ration because of various reasons that eventually boils down to lack of an Aadhaar link.

“For some, it is the lack of an Aadhaar card, for some others the biometric fails. But in the end the result is the same - exclusion,” he says.

Hundreds of kilometres away, in Banashankari in Bengaluru, 78-year-old Kannairam has a valid ration card linked to a valid Aadhaar card but he still has trouble receiving ration regularly. 

“I leave it up to the gods,” he says describing his predicament sitting inside his tiny house in Vijaya College slum. “In the last six months I have not received ration because my fingerprint is not registering,” he says with a look of resignation.

Kannairam lives with Adhilakshmi (72), his two granddaughters Mohanadevi and  Muthubharati and grandson, Srihara. Before fingerprint identification became mandatory to receive ration, Kannairam would ask one of his grandchildren to make the journey to the local Nyaya Bele Angadi (Fair Price Shop) and avail the 10 kg of rice earmarked for him and his wife every month. However, after officials made an Aadhaar link mandatory to stop card manipulation, Kannairam says it is a burden not only because he has to spend on auto-rickshaws  but also because it is exhaustive for him to do it.

Kannairam (78) and his wife Adhilaksmi (72) at their home in Vijaya College Slum in Banashankari, Bengaluru

Dhanalakshmi, an activist working with Right to Food campaign, a network of organisations and individuals working to implement right to food in the country, says there are hundreds of people in Bengaluru who have been denied ration for a variety of reasons that come under three levels of exclusion - the first where when people don’t have a valid Aaadhaar number, the second where people have not linked their Aadhaar cards to ration cards and third, when biometrics do not match.


Vijaya College Slum in Banashankari, Bengaluru
“It is not just ration that is being denied, some have also been denied scholarships because they have not had an Aadhaar card. In most cases, it is the poorest who are doing manual work like coolie work that have been affected,” says Dhanalakshmi.

Ramya (12), a sixth standard student at the Govt. Tamil Higher Primary School in Bhavani Nagar in Bengaluru is one of those who have not only been denied ration but also scholarship in her school.

Ramya at her home in Bhavani Nagar in Bengaluru
Her mother Saraswati (38), a coolie worker, does not know why her Aadhaar card was struck down and has visited the Bengaluru Development Authority complex five times to fix the problem, to no avail. “When I have to leave for the BDA, I have to dedicate an entire day because usually I will end up waiting till 3 pm or 4 pm,” she says.

Saraswati (38) lives with her husband Venu, her sons Vignes and Sathish and daughter Ramya 
The working principle in the cases in Bengaluru is eerily similar to the one followed in Chikballapur i.e ‘No Aadhaar no ration’.

Constant flip-flopping of rules
This, even after Centre had instructed state governments in October 2017 to not deny ration to those who do not have an Aadhaar card or have not linked their ration cards to Aadhaar.
In repeated orders since 2013, the Supreme Court has stressed that an Aadhaar card link cannot be made compulsory to avail government welfare benefits. The Aadhaar Act, specifically section 7, which allows the use of Aadhaar to deliver government services does not specify that it is a mandatory requirement.

Despite this, Rajasthan, MaharashtraGujarat, Jharkhand and Haryana were among a number of states that made Aadhaar-linked biometric authentication compulsory to receive ration at government-run PDS shops. This has led to several legal battles in courts across the country.

The Centre which had made the linkage compulsory in a government order in February 2017 retracted its order in October of the same year and instructed states to not deny PDS.

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the authority that issues Aaadhar, followed suit with its own order saying no essential service can be denied for want of the biometric national ID.

The Karnataka government passed a bill called ‘The Karnataka Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill 2018’ making “proof of Aadhaar number necessary for receipt of certain subsidies, benefits and services” only two days ago.

But tell Kannairam, Saraswati or Munirajappa this and they will never believe you.

“PDS sellers have long internalised the fact that Aadhaar is mandatory to avail ration, bill or no bill,” says Shashiraj.

'No Aadhaar no ration'
The constant flip-flopping of the compulsion of an Aadhaar link has had little or no impact on the ground in Karnataka where many citizens have had to adhere to the ‘No Aadhaar no ration’ working rule.

In February 2017, Sukanya, a tailor from Channapattana in Ramanagara moved the Karnataka High Court after she was denied subsidised foodgrain due to a lack of an Aadhaar link. The court ordered the concerned government departments to provide subsidised foodgrain without the production of an Aadhaar card.

In July 2017, a fact-finding report by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) raised questions about whether three men who died of starvation in Uttara Kannada were denied PDS grain because their ration card was not linked to Aadhaar. In the same month, Mysuru district officials deleted 80,000 ration cards that were not linked to Aadhaar labelling them as ‘fake’ cards.

In October 2017, in a public hearing organised by the Right to Food campaign, over twenty people from various districts of Karnataka shared their stories of struggle and helplessness. The testaments from various people reiterated the fact that ration shops in the state continued to deny them essentials.
In January 2018, forty Dalit families in Chowdadenahalli in Chikballapur took the extreme step of spreading out mats and eating raw vegetables protesting denial of ration for one-and-a-half years for not linking their Aadhaar cards. They were compensated with all 1-and-a-half years’ worth of ration when the issue came to the notice of officials at the Food and Civil Supplies Department in Bengaluru.

Dalit families in Chowdadenahalli in Chintamani protest against denial of ration on January 8 2018
Shashiraj, Dhanalakshmi and several other activists in Karnataka agree that the apathy of local civic officials is not an aberration but a systemic problem in many parts of the state including Chikkamagaluru, Belagavi, Ramanagara districts and can only be fought by holding widespread protests and spreading awareness. The Right to Food campaign has filed 300 affidavits and more than 1,000 signed petitions to the Supreme Court in Right to Privacy cases.

The Supreme Court is also currently hearing a case questioning the constitutional validity of Aadhaar. The result of the case will have an impact on all other Aadhaar related cases across the country. "We are waiting to see what happens in the Supreme Court. After all, this made people in our village halt their lives and sit out in the sun in protest," Shashiraj says.